IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v49y2013i1p176-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auction pricing of network access for North American railways

Author

Listed:
  • Harrod, Steven

Abstract

The question of pricing train paths for “open access” railway networks in North America is discussed. An auction process is suggested as necessary to maintain transparency in the contracting process. Multiple random samples of auction pricing for a single track railway line demonstrate that the infrastructure entity will receive approximately 15.6% less than the true value of the contracted train paths. This loss of revenue threatens the objective of reducing government subsidy for the railway network.

Suggested Citation

  • Harrod, Steven, 2013. "Auction pricing of network access for North American railways," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 176-189.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:49:y:2013:i:1:p:176-189
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554512000786
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2012.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Ciancimino & G. Inzerillo & S. Lucidi & L. Palagi, 1999. "A Mathematical Programming Approach for the Solution of the Railway Yield Management Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 168-181, May.
    2. Amaral, Miguel & Saussier, Stéphane & Yvrande-Billon, Anne, 2009. "Auction procedures and competition in public services: The case of urban public transport in France and London," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 166-175, June.
    3. Harrod, Steven, 2009. "Capacity factors of a mixed speed railway network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 830-841, September.
    4. Kalyan Talluri & Garrett van Ryzin, 1999. "A Randomized Linear Programming Method for Computing Network Bid Prices," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 207-216, May.
    5. Jeffrey I. McGill & Garrett J. van Ryzin, 1999. "Revenue Management: Research Overview and Prospects," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 233-256, May.
    6. Guido Friebel & Marc Ivaldi & Catherine Vibes, 2010. "Railway (De)Regulation: A European Efficiency Comparison," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 77(305), pages 77-91, January.
    7. Steven Harrod, 2011. "Modeling Network Transition Constraints with Hypergraphs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 81-97, February.
    8. Gibson, Stephen, 2003. "Allocation of capacity in the rail industry," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 39-42, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Savelsbergh & Masoud Talebian, 2019. "Cost allocation under competition: a new rail access charging policy," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(5), pages 511-534, December.
    2. Feng, Fenling & Zhang, Jiaqi & Liu, Chengguang, 2023. "Integrated pricing mechanism of China Railway Express whole-process logistics based on the Stackelberg game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    3. E. Ursavas & Stuart X. Zhu, 2018. "Integrated Passenger and Freight Train Planning on Shared-Use Corridors," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1376-1390, December.
    4. Guoyong Yue & Zijian Zhao & Lei Dai & Hao Hu, 2024. "Research on Intercity Railway Subsidy Mechanism Optimization from the Perspective of a Government–Company Game Model: A Case Study of Henan Intercity Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Talebian, Ahmadreza & Zou, Bo & Peivandi, Ahmad, 2018. "Capacity allocation in vertically integrated rail systems: A bargaining approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 167-191.
    6. Stojadinović, Nikola & Bošković, Branislav & Trifunović, Dejan & Janković, Slađana, 2019. "Train path congestion management: Using hybrid auctions for decentralized railway capacity allocation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 123-139.
    7. Ugo ARRIGO & Giacomo DI FOGGIA, 2014. "Theoretical And Viable Charging Models For Railway Infrastructure Access: An European Survey," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(2), pages 5-24, June.
    8. Fenling Feng & Tianzuo Zhang & Chengguang Liu & Lifeng Fan, 2020. "China Railway Express Subsidy Model Based on Game Theory under “the Belt and Road” Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William L. Cooper, 2002. "Asymptotic Behavior of an Allocation Policy for Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 720-727, August.
    2. Gabriel Bitran & René Caldentey, 2003. "An Overview of Pricing Models for Revenue Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 203-229, August.
    3. Meissner, Joern & Strauss, Arne, 2012. "Network revenue management with inventory-sensitive bid prices and customer choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 459-468.
    4. Kalyan Talluri & Garrett van Ryzin, 2000. "Revenue management under general discrete choice model of consumer behavior," Economics Working Papers 533, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Oct 2001.
    5. Nicolas Houy & François Le Grand, 2015. "The Monte Carlo first-come-first-served heuristic for network revenue management," Working Papers halshs-01155698, HAL.
    6. Talebian, Ahmadreza & Zou, Bo, 2015. "Integrated modeling of high performance passenger and freight train planning on shared-use corridors in the US," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 114-140.
    7. Andris Möller & Werner Römisch & Klaus Weber, 2008. "Airline network revenue management by multistage stochastic programming," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 355-377, October.
    8. Pak, K. & Dekker, R. & Kindervater, G.A.P., 2003. "Airline Revenue Management with Shifting Capacity," Econometric Institute Research Papers ERS-2003-091-LIS, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Wuyang Yuan & Lei Nie, 2020. "Optimization of seat allocation with fixed prices: An application of railway revenue management in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, April.
    10. H Jiang, 2008. "A Lagrangian relaxation approach for network inventory control of stochastic revenue management with perishable commodities," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 372-380, March.
    11. Syed Asif Raza & Rafi Ashrafi & Ali Akgunduz, 2020. "A bibliometric analysis of revenue management in airline industry," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(6), pages 436-465, December.
    12. Meng, Qiang & Zhao, Hui & Wang, Yadong, 2019. "Revenue management for container liner shipping services: Critical review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 280-292.
    13. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sanne de Boer, 2005. "Simulation-Based Booking Limits for Airline Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 90-106, February.
    14. Dan Zhang & Larry Weatherford, 2017. "Dynamic Pricing for Network Revenue Management: A New Approach and Application in the Hotel Industry," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 18-35, February.
    15. Meissner, Joern & Strauss, Arne, 2012. "Improved bid prices for choice-based network revenue management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 417-427.
    16. Xu, Guangming & Zhong, Linhuan & Hu, Xinlei & Liu, Wei, 2022. "Optimal pricing and seat allocation schemes in passenger railway systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Yoon, Moon Gil & Lee, Hwi Young & Song, Yoon Sook, 2012. "Linear approximation approach for a stochastic seat allocation problem with cancellation & refund policy in airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 41-46.
    18. Alexander Armstrong & Joern Meissner, 2010. "Railway Revenue Management: Overview and Models (Operations Research)," Working Papers MRG/0019, Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, revised Jul 2010.
    19. Kalyan Talluri & Garrett van Ryzin, 2004. "Revenue Management Under a General Discrete Choice Model of Consumer Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 15-33, January.
    20. Jeffrey I. McGill & Garrett J. van Ryzin, 1999. "Revenue Management: Research Overview and Prospects," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 233-256, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:49:y:2013:i:1:p:176-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.