IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v68y2014icp345-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A competing Markov model for cracking prediction on civil structures

Author

Listed:
  • Kobayashi, K.
  • Kaito, K.
  • Lethanh, N.

Abstract

Cracks on the surface of civil structures (e.g. pavement sections, concrete structures) progress in several formations and under different deterioration mechanisms. In monitoring practice, it is often that cracking type with its worst damage level is selected as a representative condition state, while other cracking types and their damage levels are neglected in records, remaining as hidden information. Therefore, the practice in monitoring has a potential to conceal with a bias selection process, which possibly result in not optimal intervention strategies. In overcoming these problems, our paper presents a non-homogeneous Markov hazard model, with competing hazard rates. Cracking condition states are classified in three types (longitudinal crack, horizontal crack, and alligator crack), with three respective damage levels. The dynamic selection of cracking condition states are undergone a competing process of cracking types and damage levels. We apply a numerical solution using Bayesian estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to solve the problem of high-order integration of complete likelihood function. An empirical study on a data-set of Japanese pavement system is presented to demonstrate the applicability and contribution of the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Kobayashi, K. & Kaito, K. & Lethanh, N., 2014. "A competing Markov model for cracking prediction on civil structures," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 345-362.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:68:y:2014:i:c:p:345-362
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.06.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261514001192
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2014.06.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Newbery, David M, 1988. "Road Damage Externalities and Road User Charges," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 295-316, March.
    2. Kamal Golabi & Richard Shepard, 1997. "Pontis: A System for Maintenance Optimization and Improvement of US Bridge Networks," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 71-88, February.
    3. Kobayashi, Kiyoshi & Kaito, Kiyoyuki & Lethanh, Nam, 2012. "A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 544-561.
    4. Kamal Golabi & Ram B. Kulkarni & George B. Way, 1982. "A Statewide Pavement Management System," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 5-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Yikai & Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2015. "Development and field application of a multivariate statistical process control framework for health-monitoring of transportation infrastructure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 78-102.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. & Madanat, Samer M., 2008. "Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1074-1085, October.
    2. Yingnan Yang & Hongming Xie, 2021. "Determination of Optimal MR&R Strategy and Inspection Intervals to Support Infrastructure Maintenance Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, March.
    3. Papakonstantinou, K.G. & Shinozuka, M., 2014. "Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part II: POMDP implementation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 214-224.
    4. Pekka Mild & Ahti Salo, 2009. "Combining a Multiattribute Value Function with an Optimization Model: An Application to Dynamic Resource Allocation for Infrastructure Maintenance," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 139-152, September.
    5. Nakat, Z. & Madanat, S. & Farshidi, F. & Harvey, J., 2006. "Development of an Empirical-Mechanistic Model of Overlay Crack Progression using Data from the Washington State PMS Database," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0488k9kz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Pablo D. Fajgelbaum & Edouard Schaal, 2020. "Optimal Transport Networks in Spatial Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1411-1452, July.
    7. Baños-Pino, José F. & Boto-García, David & Zapico, Emma, 2021. "Persistence and dynamics in the efficiency of toll motorways: The Spanish case," Efficiency Series Papers 2021/03, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    8. Dioikitopoulos, Evangelos V. & Kalyvitis, Sarantis, 2008. "Public capital maintenance and congestion: Long-run growth and fiscal policies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 3760-3779, December.
    9. Ian W. H. Parry & Antonio Bento, 2001. "Revenue Recycling and the Welfare Effects of Road Pricing," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 103(4), pages 645-671, December.
    10. Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer, 2015. "A joint bottom-up solution methodology for system-level pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 106-122.
    11. Pollitt, M. G., 2024. "David Michael Garrood Newbery (1943-)," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2442, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. Gabriel Bazi & John Khoury & F. Jordan Srour, 2017. "Integrating Data Collection Optimization into Pavement Management Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(3), pages 135-146, June.
    13. A Brint & J Bridgeman & M Black, 2009. "The rise, current position and future direction of asset management in utility industries," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 106-113, May.
    14. Wenfei Bai & Quanxin Sun & Futian Wang & Rengkui Liu & Ru An, 2019. "A segmental evaluation model for determining residual rail service life based on a discrete-state conditional probabilistic method," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 211-225, April.
    15. Seyedshohadaie, S. Reza & Damnjanovic, Ivan & Butenko, Sergiy, 2010. "Risk-based maintenance and rehabilitation decisions for transportation infrastructure networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 236-248, May.
    16. Seites-Rundlett, William & Bashar, Mohammad Z. & Torres-Machi, Cristina & Corotis, Ross B., 2022. "Combined evidence model to enhance pavement condition prediction from highly uncertain sensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Verhoef, Erik T., 2007. "Second-best road pricing through highway franchising," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 337-361, September.
    18. Xiong, Yingge & Tobias, Justin L. & Mannering, Fred L., 2014. "The analysis of vehicle crash injury-severity data: A Markov switching approach with road-segment heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 109-128.
    19. Mohit Tawarmalani & Yanjun Li, 2011. "Multi‐period maintenance scheduling of tree networks with minimum flow disruption," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(5), pages 507-530, August.
    20. Bian, Zheyong & Bai, Yun & Douglas, W. Scott & Maher, Ali & Liu, Xiang, 2022. "Multi-year planning for optimal navigation channel dredging and dredged material management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:68:y:2014:i:c:p:345-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.