IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v44y2010i4p236-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-based maintenance and rehabilitation decisions for transportation infrastructure networks

Author

Listed:
  • Seyedshohadaie, S. Reza
  • Damnjanovic, Ivan
  • Butenko, Sergiy

Abstract

A method for determining optimal risk-based maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) policies for transportation infrastructure is presented. The proposed policies guarantee a certain performance level across the network under a predefined level of risk. The long-term model is formulated in the Markov Decision Process framework with risk-averse actions and transitional probabilities describing the uncertainty in the deterioration process. The well known Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) is used as the measure of risk. The steady-state risk-averse M&R policies are modeled assuming no budget restriction. To address the short-term resource allocation problem, two linear programming models are presented to generate network-level polices with different objectives. While the proposed methodology is general and can be used with any performance indicator, pavement roughness is used for numerical studies and an analytical expression for computing CVaR is derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyedshohadaie, S. Reza & Damnjanovic, Ivan & Butenko, Sergiy, 2010. "Risk-based maintenance and rehabilitation decisions for transportation infrastructure networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 236-248, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:44:y:2010:i:4:p:236-248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965-8564(10)00015-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yuwei & Madanat, Samer, 2002. "A steady-state solution for the optimal pavement resurfacing problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 525-535, July.
    2. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Model Uncertainty and the Management of a System of Infrastructure Facilities," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6c84b9b4, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2004. "Optimal scheduling of rehabilitation activities for multiple pavement facilities: exact and approximate solutions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 347-365, June.
    4. Madanat, S M & Park, Sejung & Kuhn, K D, 2006. "Adaptive Optimization and Systematic Probing of Infrastructure System Maintenance Policies under Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4fb7k5rc, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Chootinan, Piya & Chen, Anthony & Horrocks, Matthew R. & Bolling, Doyt, 2006. "A multi-year pavement maintenance program using a stochastic simulation-based genetic algorithm approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 725-743, November.
    6. Tsunokawa, Koji & Schofer, Joseph L., 1994. "Trend curve optimal control model for highway pavement maintenance: Case study and evaluation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 151-166, March.
    7. Durango, Pablo L. & Madanat, Samer M., 2002. "Optimal maintenance and repair policies in infrastructure management under uncertain facility deterioration rates: an adaptive control approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 763-778, November.
    8. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    9. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2007. "A time series analysis framework for transportation infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 493-505, June.
    10. Kamal Golabi & Ram B. Kulkarni & George B. Way, 1982. "A Statewide Pavement Management System," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 5-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dui, Hongyan & Chen, Shuanshuan & Wang, Jia, 2021. "Failure-oriented maintenance analysis of nodes and edges in network systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Linjun Lu & Qing-Chang Lu & ABM Sertajur Rahman, 2015. "Residence and Job Location Change Choice Behavior under Flooding and Cyclone Impacts in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Zhang, Jianhua & Hu, Funian & Wang, Shuliang & Dai, Yang & Wang, Yixing, 2016. "Structural vulnerability and intervention of high speed railway networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 743-751.
    4. Lu, Qing-Chang & Zhang, Junyi & Peng, Zhong-Ren & Rahman, ABM Sertajur, 2014. "Inter-city travel behaviour adaptation to extreme weather events," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 148-153.
    5. Lu, Qing-Chang & Xu, Peng-Cheng & Zhang, Jingxiao, 2021. "Infrastructure-based transportation network vulnerability modeling and analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    6. Zhang, Jianhua & Song, Bo & Zhang, Zhaojun & Liu, Haikuan, 2014. "An approach for modeling vulnerability of the network of networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 412(C), pages 127-136.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sathaye, Nakul & Madanat, Samer, 2011. "A bottom-up solution for the multi-facility optimal pavement resurfacing problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1004-1017, August.
    2. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. & Madanat, Samer M., 2008. "Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1074-1085, October.
    3. Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer, 2015. "A joint bottom-up solution methodology for system-level pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 106-122.
    4. Zhang, Le & Fu, Liangliang & Gu, Weihua & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Hu, Yaohua, 2017. "A general iterative approach for the system-level joint optimization of pavement maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 378-400.
    5. Sathaye, Nakul & Madanat, Samer, 2012. "A bottom-up optimal pavement resurfacing solution approach for large-scale networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 520-528.
    6. Gu, Weihua & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2012. "Joint optimization of pavement maintenance and resurfacing planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 511-519.
    7. Qiao, Julie Yu & Du, Runjia & Labi, Samuel & Fricker, Jon D. & Sinha, Kumares C., 2021. "Policy implications of standalone timing versus holistic timing of infrastructure interventions: Findings based on pavement surface roughness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 79-99.
    8. Xinhua Mao & Changwei Yuan & Jiahua Gan, 2019. "Incorporating Dynamic Traffic Distribution into Pavement Maintenance Optimization Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer, 2014. "Joint optimization of pavement design, resurfacing and maintenance strategies with history-dependent deterioration models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 141-153.
    10. Zhi-Chun Li & Dian Sheng, 2014. "Pavement rehabilitation scheduling and toll pricing under different regulatory regimes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 337-355, June.
    11. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2006. "An analytical solution for the finite-horizon pavement resurfacing planning problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 767-778, November.
    12. Li, Sirui & Liu, Ying & Wang, Pengfei & Liu, Peng & Meng, Jun, 2020. "A novel approach for predicting urban pavement damage based on facility information: A case study of Beijing, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 26-37.
    13. Lu, Zhaoyang & Meng, Qiang, 2018. "Impacts of pavement deterioration and maintenance cost on Pareto-efficient contracts for highway franchising," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-21.
    14. Pantha, Bhoj Raj & Yatabe, Ryuichi & Bhandary, Netra Prakash, 2010. "GIS-based highway maintenance prioritization model: an integrated approach for highway maintenance in Nepal mountains," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 426-433.
    15. Charles-Antoine Robelin & Samer M. Madanat, 2008. "Reliability-Based System-Level Optimization of Bridge Maintenance and Replacement Decisions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 508-513, November.
    16. Orcesi, André D. & Cremona, Christian F., 2010. "A bridge network maintenance framework for Pareto optimization of stakeholders/users costs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1230-1243.
    17. Zhang, Xueqing & Gao, Hui, 2012. "Road maintenance optimization through a discrete-time semi-Markov decision process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 110-119.
    18. Li, Yuwei & Madanat, Samer, 2002. "A steady-state solution for the optimal pavement resurfacing problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 525-535, July.
    19. Rafic Faddoul & Abdul-Hamid Soubra & Wassim Raphael & Alaa Chateauneuf, 2013. "Extension of dynamic programming models for management optimization from single structure to multi-structures level," Post-Print hal-01006860, HAL.
    20. Lu, Zhaoyang & Li, Yanfeng & Zuo, Dajie, 2024. "Period-dependent pricing methods of multi-type vehicles for BOT highway projects with pavement rehabilitation effects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 84-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:44:y:2010:i:4:p:236-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.