IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v130y2014icp214-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part II: POMDP implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Papakonstantinou, K.G.
  • Shinozuka, M.

Abstract

The overall objective of this two part study is to highlight the advanced attributes, capabilities and use of stochastic control techniques, and especially Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs), that can address the conundrum of planning optimum inspection/monitoring and maintenance policies based on stochastic models and uncertain structural data in real time. In this second part of the study a distinct, advanced, infinite horizon POMDP formulation with 332 states is cast and solved, related to a corroding reinforced concrete structure and its minimum life-cycle cost. The formation and solution of the problem modernize and extend relevant approaches and motivate the use of POMDP methods in challenging practical applications. Apart from uncertain observations the presented framework can also support uncertain action outcomes, non-periodic inspections and choice availability of inspection/monitoring types and intervals, as well as maintenance actions and action times. It is thus no surprise that the estimated optimum policy consists of a complex combination of a variety of actions, which cannot be achieved by any other method. To be able to solve the problem we resort to a point-based value iteration solver and we evaluate its performance and solution quality for this type of applications. Simpler approximate solvers based on MDPs are also used and compared and the important notions of observation gathering actions and the value of information are briefly discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Papakonstantinou, K.G. & Shinozuka, M., 2014. "Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part II: POMDP implementation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 214-224.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:130:y:2014:i:c:p:214-224
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832014000684
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samer Madanat & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 1994. "Optimal Inspection and Repair Policies for Infrastructure Facilities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 55-62, February.
    2. Kamal Golabi & Ram B. Kulkarni & George B. Way, 1982. "A Statewide Pavement Management System," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 5-21, December.
    3. Papakonstantinou, K.G. & Shinozuka, M., 2014. "Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part I: Theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 202-213.
    4. Kamal Golabi & Richard Shepard, 1997. "Pontis: A System for Maintenance Optimization and Improvement of US Bridge Networks," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 71-88, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. & Madanat, Samer M., 2008. "Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1074-1085, October.
    2. Seites-Rundlett, William & Bashar, Mohammad Z. & Torres-Machi, Cristina & Corotis, Ross B., 2022. "Combined evidence model to enhance pavement condition prediction from highly uncertain sensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Yingnan Yang & Hongming Xie, 2021. "Determination of Optimal MR&R Strategy and Inspection Intervals to Support Infrastructure Maintenance Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Durango, Pablo L. & Madanat, Samer M., 2002. "Optimal maintenance and repair policies in infrastructure management under uncertain facility deterioration rates: an adaptive control approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 763-778, November.
    5. Memarzadeh, Milad & Pozzi, Matteo, 2016. "Value of information in sequential decision making: Component inspection, permanent monitoring and system-level scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 137-151.
    6. Zhang, Xueqing & Gao, Hui, 2012. "Road maintenance optimization through a discrete-time semi-Markov decision process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 110-119.
    7. Özgür-Ünlüakın, Demet & Bilgiç, Taner, 2017. "Performance analysis of an aggregation and disaggregation solution procedure to obtain a maintenance plan for a partially observable multi-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 652-662.
    8. Pekka Mild & Ahti Salo, 2009. "Combining a Multiattribute Value Function with an Optimization Model: An Application to Dynamic Resource Allocation for Infrastructure Maintenance," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 139-152, September.
    9. Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer, 2015. "A joint bottom-up solution methodology for system-level pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 106-122.
    10. Joaquim AP Braga & António R Andrade, 2019. "Optimizing maintenance decisions in railway wheelsets: A Markov decision process approach," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 285-300, April.
    11. Kıvanç, İpek & Özgür-Ünlüakın, Demet & Bilgiç, Taner, 2022. "Maintenance policy analysis of the regenerative air heater system using factored POMDPs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    12. Madanat, S M & Durango, Pablo L, 2001. "Optimal maintenance and repair policies in infrastructure management under uncertain facility deterioration rates: an adaptive control approach," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8jz8h9fw, University of California Transportation Center.
    13. Rafic Faddoul & Abdul-Hamid Soubra & Wassim Raphael & Alaa Chateauneuf, 2013. "Extension of dynamic programming models for management optimization from single structure to multi-structures level," Post-Print hal-01006860, HAL.
    14. Zhang, Le & Fu, Liangliang & Gu, Weihua & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Hu, Yaohua, 2017. "A general iterative approach for the system-level joint optimization of pavement maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 378-400.
    15. Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2007. "A time series analysis framework for transportation infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 493-505, June.
    16. Kobayashi, K. & Kaito, K. & Lethanh, N., 2014. "A competing Markov model for cracking prediction on civil structures," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 345-362.
    17. Nakat, Z. & Madanat, S. & Farshidi, F. & Harvey, J., 2006. "Development of an Empirical-Mechanistic Model of Overlay Crack Progression using Data from the Washington State PMS Database," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0488k9kz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    18. Kobayashi, Kiyoshi & Kaito, Kiyoyuki & Lethanh, Nam, 2012. "A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 544-561.
    19. KarabaÄŸ, Oktay & Eruguz, Ayse Sena & Basten, Rob, 2020. "Integrated optimization of maintenance interventions and spare part selection for a partially observable multi-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    20. Mohit Tawarmalani & Yanjun Li, 2011. "Multi‐period maintenance scheduling of tree networks with minimum flow disruption," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(5), pages 507-530, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:130:y:2014:i:c:p:214-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.