IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v46y2012i9p1123-1143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal threshold-based network-level transportation infrastructure life-cycle management with heterogeneous maintenance actions

Author

Listed:
  • Chu, James C.
  • Chen, Yin-Jay

Abstract

Transportation infrastructure life-cycle management deals with maintenance decision making of transportation facilities such as pavement, bridges, and railways under budget constraints. In practice, transportation agencies adopt threshold-based rules for maintenance planning because they are intuitive and easy to implement. However, the thresholds are often determined based on engineering judgment without any systematic approach. Therefore, maintenance budgets cannot be used effectively and facility conditions are not optimized. This research uses hybrid dynamic models to represent threshold-based maintenance for transportation infrastructure in a realistic manner. Hybrid dynamic models combine continuous states such as pavement roughness and age with discrete states such as maintenance history. These models are also capable of considering multiple maintenance actions with heterogeneous effects. Based on facility conditions and maintenance thresholds, corresponding maintenance actions are selected automatically and the facility switches between deterioration modes to reflect the effects of the chosen action. Furthermore, to consider users’ reactions to maintenance actions and accurately predict deterioration for a network of facilities, threshold-based maintenance is formulated as an upper-level problem, and user response is incorporated as a lower-level problem. This leads to a bi-level programming problem where maintenance thresholds are decision variables, which is solved with a modified tabu search algorithm. The proposed methodology is validated with the road network of an urban area and the generated maintenance thresholds are reasonable and robust, which shows that the methodology has great potential to support transportation infrastructure life-cycle management in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Chu, James C. & Chen, Yin-Jay, 2012. "Optimal threshold-based network-level transportation infrastructure life-cycle management with heterogeneous maintenance actions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1123-1143.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:46:y:2012:i:9:p:1123-1143
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.05.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261512000744
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2012.05.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2006. "An analytical solution for the finite-horizon pavement resurfacing planning problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 767-778, November.
    2. Li, Yuwei & Madanat, Samer, 2002. "A steady-state solution for the optimal pavement resurfacing problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 525-535, July.
    3. Sathaye, Nakul & Madanat, Samer, 2011. "A bottom-up solution for the multi-facility optimal pavement resurfacing problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1004-1017, August.
    4. Tsunokawa, Koji & Schofer, Joseph L., 1994. "Trend curve optimal control model for highway pavement maintenance: Case study and evaluation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 151-166, March.
    5. Yang, Hai & Yagar, Sam, 1994. "Traffic assignment and traffic control in general freeway-arterial corridor systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 463-486, December.
    6. Gu, Weihua & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2012. "Joint optimization of pavement maintenance and resurfacing planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 511-519.
    7. Larry J. Leblanc, 1975. "An Algorithm for the Discrete Network Design Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 183-199, August.
    8. Terry L. Friesz & Hsun-Jung Cho & Nihal J. Mehta & Roger L. Tobin & G. Anandalingam, 1992. "A Simulated Annealing Approach to the Network Design Problem with Variational Inequality Constraints," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 18-26, February.
    9. Wen, U. P. & Huang, A. D., 1996. "A simple Tabu Search method to solve the mixed-integer linear bilevel programming problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 563-571, February.
    10. Rommert Dekker & Ralph Wildeman & Frank Duyn Schouten, 1997. "A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 45(3), pages 411-435, October.
    11. Friesz, Terry L. & Enrique Fernandez, J., 1979. "A model of optimal transport maintenance with demand responsiveness," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 317-339, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinhua Mao & Changwei Yuan & Jiahua Gan, 2019. "Incorporating Dynamic Traffic Distribution into Pavement Maintenance Optimization Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer, 2015. "A joint bottom-up solution methodology for system-level pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 106-122.
    3. Wen, M. & Li, R. & Salling, K.B., 2016. "Optimization of preventive condition-based tamping for railway tracks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 455-465.
    4. Sachuer Bao & Chi Zhang & Min Ouyang & Lixin Miao, 2019. "An integrated tri-level model for enhancing the resilience of facilities against intentional attacks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 87-117, December.
    5. Zhang, Le & Fu, Liangliang & Gu, Weihua & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Hu, Yaohua, 2017. "A general iterative approach for the system-level joint optimization of pavement maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 378-400.
    6. David Rey & Hillel Bar-Gera & Vinayak V. Dixit & S. Travis Waller, 2019. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Bilevel Network Maintenance Scheduling Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1455-1478, September.
    7. Chu, James C. & Huang, Kai-Hsiang, 2018. "Mathematical programming framework for modeling and comparing network-level pavement maintenance strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-25.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer, 2015. "A joint bottom-up solution methodology for system-level pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 106-122.
    2. Zhi-Chun Li & Dian Sheng, 2014. "Pavement rehabilitation scheduling and toll pricing under different regulatory regimes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 337-355, June.
    3. Zhang, Le & Fu, Liangliang & Gu, Weihua & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Hu, Yaohua, 2017. "A general iterative approach for the system-level joint optimization of pavement maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 378-400.
    4. Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer, 2014. "Joint optimization of pavement design, resurfacing and maintenance strategies with history-dependent deterioration models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 141-153.
    5. Gu, Weihua & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2012. "Joint optimization of pavement maintenance and resurfacing planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 511-519.
    6. Sathaye, Nakul & Madanat, Samer, 2012. "A bottom-up optimal pavement resurfacing solution approach for large-scale networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 520-528.
    7. Sathaye, Nakul & Madanat, Samer, 2011. "A bottom-up solution for the multi-facility optimal pavement resurfacing problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1004-1017, August.
    8. Lu, Zhaoyang & Meng, Qiang, 2018. "Impacts of pavement deterioration and maintenance cost on Pareto-efficient contracts for highway franchising," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-21.
    9. Qiao, Julie Yu & Du, Runjia & Labi, Samuel & Fricker, Jon D. & Sinha, Kumares C., 2021. "Policy implications of standalone timing versus holistic timing of infrastructure interventions: Findings based on pavement surface roughness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 79-99.
    10. Chu, James C. & Huang, Kai-Hsiang, 2018. "Mathematical programming framework for modeling and comparing network-level pavement maintenance strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-25.
    11. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2004. "Optimal scheduling of rehabilitation activities for multiple pavement facilities: exact and approximate solutions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 347-365, June.
    12. Meng, Q. & Yang, H. & Bell, M. G. H., 2001. "An equivalent continuously differentiable model and a locally convergent algorithm for the continuous network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 83-105, January.
    13. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Madanat, Samer, 2006. "An analytical solution for the finite-horizon pavement resurfacing planning problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 767-778, November.
    14. Joseph Y. J. Chow & Amelia C. Regan, 2011. "Real Option Pricing of Network Design Investments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 50-63, February.
    15. Verbert, K. & De Schutter, B. & Babuška, R., 2017. "Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 310-321.
    16. Poorzahedy, Hossain & Rouhani, Omid M., 2007. "Hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms for solving network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 578-596, October.
    17. Seyedshohadaie, S. Reza & Damnjanovic, Ivan & Butenko, Sergiy, 2010. "Risk-based maintenance and rehabilitation decisions for transportation infrastructure networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 236-248, May.
    18. Li, Changmin & Yang, Hai & Zhu, Daoli & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "A global optimization method for continuous network design problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1144-1158.
    19. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Miandoabchi, Elnaz & Szeto, W.Y. & Rashidi, Hannaneh, 2013. "A review of urban transportation network design problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 281-302.
    20. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 2001. "Transport bilevel programming problems: recent methodological advances," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-4, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:46:y:2012:i:9:p:1123-1143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.