IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v167y2023icp118-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement and ranking of important link combinations in the analysis of transportation network vulnerability envelope buffers under multiple-link disruptions

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Yu
  • Chen, Anthony
  • Xu, Xiangdong

Abstract

This study proposes an optimization-based approach to rank the importance of link combinations and analyze network vulnerability in extreme and near-extreme cases of disruption under the simultaneous disruption of multiple links. A vulnerability envelope concept is used, which considers the worst and best network performance under multiple-link disruptions. This study goes a step further than previous studies, which have focused on the extreme cases that form the boundary of a vulnerability envelope, to investigate the near-extreme cases inside an envelope and the network performance buffers (i.e., the differences in network performance) between different cases. A flexible framework based on combinatorial optimization modeling is used to determine the most important link combinations and the lower and upper bounds of network performance under their disruptions, which form the vulnerability envelope. A constraint-based method is developed to iteratively identify sub-important link combinations that lead to the formation of buffers of the lower and upper bounds of the vulnerability envelope. Numerical experiments are conducted to illustrate the properties and applicability of the proposed method. The results demonstrate that the consideration of near-extreme cases yields additional valuable information that is not generated by the traditional vulnerability analysis, which is focused on extreme cases. Ranking of the most and sub-most important link combinations enables the identification of non-unique worst/best cases, thereby revealing alternative link combinations to better inform decision-making. Consideration of the network performances in extreme and near-extreme cases affords a less conservative vulnerability assessment and reveals the potential cost of considering only extreme cases in decision-making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Xiangdong, 2023. "Measurement and ranking of important link combinations in the analysis of transportation network vulnerability envelope buffers under multiple-link disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 118-144.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:167:y:2023:i:c:p:118-144
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2022.11.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261522001941
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2022.11.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fumitaka Kurauchi & Nobuhiro Uno & Agachai Sumalee & Yumiko Seto, 2009. "Network Evaluation Based on Connectivity Vulnerability," Springer Books, in: William H. K. Lam & S. C. Wong & Hong K. Lo (ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee, chapter 0, pages 637-649, Springer.
    2. David L. Alderson & Gerald G. Brown & W. Matthew Carlyle & R. Kevin Wood, 2018. "Assessing and Improving the Operational Resilience of a Large Highway Infrastructure System to Worst-Case Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 1012-1034, August.
    3. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Jansuwan, Sarawut & Yang, Chao & Ryu, Seungkyu, 2018. "Transportation network redundancy: Complementary measures and computational methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 68-85.
    4. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Michael Taylor & Somenahalli Sekhar & Glen D'Este, 2006. "Application of Accessibility Based Methods for Vulnerability Analysis of Strategic Road Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 267-291, September.
    6. Nogal, Maria & O'Connor, Alan & Caulfield, Brian & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz, 2016. "Resilience of traffic networks: From perturbation to recovery via a dynamic restricted equilibrium model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 84-96.
    7. Yang, Hai & Sasaki, Tsuna & Iida, Yasunori & Asakura, Yasuo, 1992. "Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link traffic counts on congested networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 417-434, December.
    8. Sugiura, Satoshi & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "Vulnerability analysis of cut-capacity structure and OD demand using Gomory-Hu tree method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 111-127.
    9. Berdica, Katja, 2002. "An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 117-127, April.
    10. B. Berche & C. von Ferber & T. Holovatch & Yu. Holovatch, 2009. "Resilience of public transport networks against attacks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(1), pages 125-137, September.
    11. Marsden, Greg & Reardon, Louise, 2017. "Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 238-251.
    12. Jenelius, Erik & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2012. "Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 746-760.
    13. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony, 2009. "Sensitivity analysis of the combined travel demand model with applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 909-921, November.
    14. Nogal, M. & Honfi, D., 2019. "Assessment of road traffic resilience assuming stochastic user behaviour," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 72-83.
    15. Szymula, Christopher & Bešinović, Nikola, 2020. "Passenger-centered vulnerability assessment of railway networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-61.
    16. Mostafa Bababeik & Mohammad Mahdi Nasiri & Navid Khademi & Anthony Chen, 2019. "Vulnerability evaluation of freight railway networks using a heuristic routing and scheduling optimization model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1143-1170, August.
    17. Jing Liu & Huapu Lu & He Ma & Wenzhi Liu, 2017. "Network Vulnerability Analysis of Rail Transit Plans in Beijng-Tianjin-Hebei Region Considering Connectivity Reliability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Chen, Bi Yu & Lam, William H.K. & Sumalee, Agachai & Li, Qingquan & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2012. "Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 501-516.
    19. Paramet Luathep & Agachai Sumalee & H. Ho & Fumitaka Kurauchi, 2011. "Large-scale road network vulnerability analysis: a sensitivity analysis based approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(5), pages 799-817, September.
    20. Chen, Anthony & Yang, Hai & Lo, Hong K. & Tang, Wilson H., 2002. "Capacity reliability of a road network: an assessment methodology and numerical results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 225-252, March.
    21. Jenelius, Erik & Petersen, Tom & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2006. "Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 537-560, August.
    22. Bell, Michael G.H. & Kurauchi, Fumitaka & Perera, Supun & Wong, Walter, 2017. "Investigating transport network vulnerability by capacity weighted spectral analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 251-266.
    23. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Xiangdong & Wong, S.C., 2013. "Sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 225-244.
    24. Alan Murray & Timothy Matisziw & Tony Grubesic, 2007. "Critical network infrastructure analysis: interdiction and system flow," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 103-117, June.
    25. Gu, Yu & Fu, Xiao & Liu, Zhiyuan & Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony, 2020. "Performance of transportation network under perturbations: Reliability, vulnerability, and resilience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    26. Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2011. "Bounded rationality and irreversible network change," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1606-1618.
    27. Adam Pel & Michiel Bliemer & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2012. "A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 97-123, January.
    28. Anthony Chen & Chao Yang & Sirisak Kongsomsaksakul & Ming Lee, 2007. "Network-based Accessibility Measures for Vulnerability Analysis of Degradable Transportation Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 241-256, September.
    29. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Yao Chen, 2018. "The Optimization Approach," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 107-134, Springer.
    30. Chen, Anthony & Chootinan, Piya & Recker, Will, 2009. "Norm approximation method for handling traffic count inconsistencies in path flow estimator," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(8-9), pages 852-872, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ermagun, Alireza & Tajik, Nazanin & Janatabadi, Fatemeh & Mahmassani, Hani, 2023. "Uncertainty in vulnerability of metro transit networks: A global perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Iliopoulou, Christina & Makridis, Michail A., 2023. "Critical multi-link disruption identification for public transport networks: A multi-objective optimization framework," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gu, Yu & Fu, Xiao & Liu, Zhiyuan & Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony, 2020. "Performance of transportation network under perturbations: Reliability, vulnerability, and resilience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili & Yan, Kesheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis and critical area identification of public transport system: A case of high-speed rail and air transport coupling system in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 55-70.
    4. Bell, Michael G.H. & Kurauchi, Fumitaka & Perera, Supun & Wong, Walter, 2017. "Investigating transport network vulnerability by capacity weighted spectral analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 251-266.
    5. Khademi, Navid & Babaei, Mohsen & Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Fani, Amirhossein, 2018. "Analysis of incident costs in a vulnerable sparse rail network – Description and Iran case study," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 9-27.
    6. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Jansuwan, Sarawut & Yang, Chao & Ryu, Seungkyu, 2018. "Transportation network redundancy: Complementary measures and computational methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 68-85.
    7. Gonçalves, L.A.P.J. & Ribeiro, P.J.G., 2020. "Resilience of urban transportation systems. Concept, characteristics, and methods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    8. Muriel-Villegas, Juan E. & Alvarez-Uribe, Karla C. & Patiño-Rodríguez, Carmen E. & Villegas, Juan G., 2016. "Analysis of transportation networks subject to natural hazards – Insights from a Colombian case," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 151-165.
    9. Caterina Malandri & Luca Mantecchini & Filippo Paganelli & Maria Nadia Postorino, 2021. "Public Transport Network Vulnerability and Delay Distribution among Travelers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Rodríguez-Núñez, Eduardo & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2014. "Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 50-63.
    11. Sugiura, Satoshi & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "Vulnerability analysis of cut-capacity structure and OD demand using Gomory-Hu tree method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 111-127.
    12. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    13. Victor Cantillo & Luis F. Macea & Miguel Jaller, 2019. "Assessing Vulnerability of Transportation Networks for Disaster Response Operations," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 243-273, March.
    14. Jiangang Shi & Shiping Wen & Xianbo Zhao & Guangdong Wu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Vulnerability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Demirel, Hande & Kompil, Mert & Nemry, Françoise, 2015. "A framework to analyze the vulnerability of European road networks due to Sea-Level Rise (SLR) and sea storm surges," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 62-76.
    16. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2018. "Accessibility analysis of risk severity," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1029-1050, July.
    17. Mohamad Darayi & Kash Barker & Joost R. Santos, 2017. "Component Importance Measures for Multi-Industry Vulnerability of a Freight Transportation Network," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1111-1136, December.
    18. Jenelius, Erik & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2012. "Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 746-760.
    19. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    20. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Guangming & Yang, Chao & Lam, William H.K., 2021. "Enhancing network resilience by adding redundancy to road networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:167:y:2023:i:c:p:118-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.