IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v156y2016icp84-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience of traffic networks: From perturbation to recovery via a dynamic restricted equilibrium model

Author

Listed:
  • Nogal, Maria
  • O'Connor, Alan
  • Caulfield, Brian
  • Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz

Abstract

When a disruptive event takes place in a traffic network some important questions arise, such as how stressed the traffic network is, whether the system is able to respond to this stressful situation, or how long the system needs to recover a new equilibrium position after suffering this perturbation. Quantifying these aspects allows the comparison of different systems, to scale the degree of damage, to identify traffic network weaknesses, and to analyse the effect of user knowledge about the traffic network state. The indicator that accounts for performance and recovery pattern under disruptive events is known as resilience. This paper presents a methodology to assess the resilience of a traffic network when a given perturbation occurs, from the beginning of the perturbation to the total system recovery. To consider the dynamic nature of the problem, a new dynamic equilibrium-restricted assignment model is presented to simulate the network performance evolution, which takes into consideration important aspects, such as the cost increment due to the perturbation, the system impedance to alter its previous state and the user stress level. Finally, this methodology is used to evaluate the resilience indices of a real network.

Suggested Citation

  • Nogal, Maria & O'Connor, Alan & Caulfield, Brian & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz, 2016. "Resilience of traffic networks: From perturbation to recovery via a dynamic restricted equilibrium model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 84-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:156:y:2016:i:c:p:84-96
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016302915
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mengyao Gao & Bo Zhang & Vicki M. Bier & Tao Yao, 2015. "A Heuristic Method for Identifying Near-Optimal Defending Strategies for a Road Network Subject to Traffic Congestion," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Kjell Hausken & Jun Zhuang (ed.), Game Theoretic Analysis of Congestion, Safety and Security, edition 127, pages 143-158, Springer.
    2. Kjell Hausken & Jun Zhuang (ed.), 2015. "Game Theoretic Analysis of Congestion, Safety and Security," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-11674-7, February.
    3. Kjell Hausken & Jun Zhuang (ed.), 2015. "Game Theoretic Analysis of Congestion, Safety and Security," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-13009-5, February.
    4. Nicholson, Charles D. & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2016. "Flow-based vulnerability measures for network component importance: Experimentation with preparedness planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 62-73.
    5. Jagtman, H.M. & Hale, A.R. & Heijer, T., 2005. "A support tool for identifying evaluation issues of road safety measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 206-216.
    6. Dedi Liu & Xiaohong Chen & Teddy Nakato, 2012. "Resilience Assessment of Water Resources System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(13), pages 3743-3755, October.
    7. Bier, Vicki M. & Hausken, Kjell, 2013. "Defending and attacking a network of two arcs subject to traffic congestion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 214-224.
    8. Gama Dessavre, Dante & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Barker, Kash, 2016. "Multidimensional approach to complex system resilience analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 34-43.
    9. Henry, Devanandham & Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, Jose, 2012. "Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 114-122.
    10. Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel & Rocco, Claudio M., 2013. "Resilience-based network component importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 89-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco, Claudio M. & Barker, Kash & Moronta, Jose, 2018. "Quantifying the resilience of community structures in networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 466-474.
    3. Das, Laya & Munikoti, Sai & Natarajan, Balasubramaniam & Srinivasan, Babji, 2020. "Measuring smart grid resilience: Methods, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Cassottana, Beatrice & Shen, Lijuan & Tang, Loon Ching, 2019. "Modeling the recovery process: A key dimension of resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Adel Mottahedi & Farhang Sereshki & Mohammad Ataei & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi, 2021. "The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    6. Morshedlou, Nazanin & González, Andrés D. & Barker, Kash, 2018. "Work crew routing problem for infrastructure network restoration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 66-89.
    7. McCarter, Matthew & Barker, Kash & Johansson, Jonas & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2018. "A bi-objective formulation for robust defense strategies in multi-commodity networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 154-161.
    8. Claudio M. Rocco & Kash Barker & Elvis Hernández‐Perdomo, 2016. "Stochastic Ranking of Alternatives with Ordered Weighted Averaging: Comparing Network Recovery Strategies," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 436-447, September.
    9. Zhao, S. & Liu, X. & Zhuo, Y., 2017. "Hybrid Hidden Markov Models for resilience metrics in a dynamic infrastructure system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 84-97.
    10. Claudio M Rocco & Kash Barker & Jose Moronta & Jose E Ramirez-Marquez, 2018. "Community detection and resilience in multi-source, multi-terminal networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 616-626, December.
    11. Almoghathawi, Yasser & Barker, Kash & Albert, Laura A., 2019. "Resilience-driven restoration model for interdependent infrastructure networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 12-23.
    12. Xu, Zhaoping & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel & Liu, Yu & Xiahou, Tangfan, 2020. "A new resilience-based component importance measure for multi-state networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Cheng, Yao & Elsayed, E.A. & Chen, Xi, 2021. "Random Multi Hazard Resilience Modeling of Engineered Systems and Critical Infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    14. Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Zhang, Jinjun & Li, Xueyi, 2018. "A systematic framework of vulnerability analysis of a natural gas pipeline network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 79-91.
    15. Kuttler, Emma & Ghorbani-Renani, Nafiseh & Barker, Kash & González, Andrés D. & Johansson, Jonas, 2024. "Protection-interdiction-restoration for resilient multi-commodity networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Umunnakwe, A. & Huang, H. & Oikonomou, K. & Davis, K.R., 2021. "Quantitative analysis of power systems resilience: Standardization, categorizations, and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Hu, Jinqiu & Khan, Faisal & Zhang, Laibin, 2021. "Dynamic resilience assessment of the Marine LNG offloading system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    18. Almoghathawi, Yasser & Selim, Shokri & Barker, Kash, 2023. "Community structure recovery optimization for partial disruption, functionality, and restoration in interdependent networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Mohamad Darayi & Kash Barker & Joost R. Santos, 2017. "Component Importance Measures for Multi-Industry Vulnerability of a Freight Transportation Network," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1111-1136, December.
    20. Baroud, Hiba & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2014. "Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 55-67.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:156:y:2016:i:c:p:84-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.