IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v185y2024ics0965856424001708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ready for take-off? The dual role of affective and cognitive evaluations in the adoption of Urban Air Mobility services

Author

Listed:
  • Janotta, Frederica
  • Hogreve, Jens

Abstract

Technological advancements have led to the development of aerial vehicle concepts for passenger transportation, termed “Urban Air Mobility.” Related services could provide more efficient and flexible travel options. However, as flight modes will shift to autonomous operations in the near future, a deeper understanding of consumer perceptions and adoption intentions related to this AI-enabled service will be crucial to its success. Building on dual-process theory, we examine the influence of affective and cognitive considerations in the formation of adoption intentions of autonomous passenger drones. Using Virtual Reality (VR), we manipulate the presence of a pilot onboard the vehicle to assess the influence of human supervision on subsequent adoption intentions using structural equation modeling. In two experimental studies, we show that affective responses exert a stronger influence on adoption intentions than cognitive considerations. Results indicate that some form of human supervision will be crucial to trust formation, especially for risk-averse consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Janotta, Frederica & Hogreve, Jens, 2024. "Ready for take-off? The dual role of affective and cognitive evaluations in the adoption of Urban Air Mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424001708
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424001708
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424001708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.