IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v179y2024ics0965856423003336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A data-driven approach for quantifying the resilience of railway networks

Author

Listed:
  • Knoester, Max J.
  • Bešinović, Nikola
  • Afghari, Amir Pooyan
  • Goverde, Rob M.P.
  • van Egmond, Jochen

Abstract

Disruptions occur frequently in railway networks, requiring timetable adjustments, while causing serious delays and cancellations. However, little is known about the performance dynamics during disruptions nor the extent to which the resilience curve applies in practice. This paper presents a data-driven quantification approach for an ex-post assessment of the resilience of railway networks. Using historical traffic realization data in the Netherlands, resilience curves are reconstructed using a new composite indicator, and quantified for a large set of single disruptions. The values of the resilience metrics are compared across disruptions of different causes using Welch’s ANOVA and the Games-Howell test. Additionally, representative resilience curves for each disruption cause are determined. Results show a significant heterogeneity in the shape of the resilience curves, even within disruptions of the same cause. The proposed approach represents a useful decision support tool for practitioners to assess disruptions dynamics and propose best measures to improve resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Knoester, Max J. & Bešinović, Nikola & Afghari, Amir Pooyan & Goverde, Rob M.P. & van Egmond, Jochen, 2024. "A data-driven approach for quantifying the resilience of railway networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:179:y:2024:i:c:s0965856423003336
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856423003336
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bababeik, Mostafa & Khademi, Navid & Chen, Anthony, 2018. "Increasing the resilience level of a vulnerable rail network: The strategy of location and allocation of emergency relief trains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 110-128.
    2. Nadjla Ghaemi & Oded Cats & Rob M. P. Goverde, 2017. "Railway disruption management challenges and possible solution directions," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 343-364, July.
    3. Xu, Zizhen & Chopra, Shauhrat S., 2022. "Network-based Assessment of Metro Infrastructure with a Spatial–temporal Resilience Cycle Framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Oded Cats & Erik Jenelius, 2014. "Dynamic Vulnerability Analysis of Public Transport Networks: Mitigation Effects of Real-Time Information," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 435-463, December.
    5. Milan Janić, 2018. "Modelling the resilience of rail passenger transport networks affected by large-scale disruptive events: the case of HSR (high speed rail)," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1101-1137, July.
    6. Adjetey-Bahun, Kpotissan & Birregah, Babiga & Châtelet, Eric & Planchet, Jean-Luc, 2016. "A model to quantify the resilience of mass railway transportation systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Woodburn, Allan, 2019. "Rail network resilience and operational responsiveness during unplanned disruption: A rail freight case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 59-69.
    8. Bešinović, Nikola & Ferrari Nassar, Raphael & Szymula, Christopher, 2022. "Resilience assessment of railway networks: Combining infrastructure restoration and transport management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Janić, Milan, 2015. "Reprint of “Modelling the resilience, friability and costs of an air transport network affected by a large-scale disruptive event”," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 77-92.
    10. Van Aken, Sander & Bešinović, Nikola & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2017. "Designing alternative railway timetables under infrastructure maintenance possessions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 224-238.
    11. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2016. "A review of definitions and measures of system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 47-61.
    12. Liu, Enze & Barker, Kash & Chen, Hong, 2022. "A multi-modal evacuation-based response strategy for mitigating disruption in an intercity railway system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    13. D’Lima, Minette & Medda, Francesca, 2015. "A new measure of resilience: An application to the London Underground," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 35-46.
    14. Zhang, Yifan & Ng, S. Thomas, 2022. "Robustness of urban railway networks against the cascading failures induced by the fluctuation of passenger flow," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    15. Albert Munoz & Michelle Dunbar, 2015. "On the quantification of operational supply chain resilience," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(22), pages 6736-6751, November.
    16. Malandri, Caterina & Fonzone, Achille & Cats, Oded, 2018. "Recovery time and propagation effects of passenger transport disruptions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 7-17.
    17. Lu, Qing-Chang, 2018. "Modeling network resilience of rail transit under operational incidents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 227-237.
    18. Yin, Jiateng & Ren, Xianliang & Liu, Ronghui & Tang, Tao & Su, Shuai, 2022. "Quantitative analysis for resilience-based urban rail systems: A hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. Wong, Allen & Tan, Sijian & Chandramouleeswaran, Keshav Ram & Tran, Huy T., 2020. "Data-driven analysis of resilience in airline networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Mark M Dekker & Debabrata Panja, 2021. "Cascading dominates large-scale disruptions in transport over complex networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    21. Liu, Kai & Zhu, Jiatong & Wang, Ming, 2021. "An event-based probabilistic model of disruption risk to urban metro networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 93-105.
    22. Payuna Uday & Karen Marais, 2015. "Designing Resilient Systems‐of‐Systems: A Survey of Metrics, Methods, and Challenges," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 491-510, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junhong Hu & Mingshu Yang & Yunzhu Zhen, 2024. "A Review of Resilience Assessment and Recovery Strategies of Urban Rail Transit Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Xinyao Yin & Junhua Chen & Yuexuan Li, 2024. "Simulation-Based Resilience Evaluation for Urban Rail Transit Transfer Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bešinović, Nikola & Ferrari Nassar, Raphael & Szymula, Christopher, 2022. "Resilience assessment of railway networks: Combining infrastructure restoration and transport management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Zhang, Li & Chen, Tingting & Liu, Zhongshan & Yu, Bin & Wang, Yunpeng, 2024. "Analysis of multi-modal public transportation system performance under metro disruptions: A dynamic resilience assessment framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    4. Xu, Peng-Cheng & Lu, Qing-Chang & Xie, Chi & Cheong, Taesu, 2024. "Modeling the resilience of interdependent networks: The role of function dependency in metro and bus systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Malandri, Caterina & Mantecchini, Luca & Postorino, Maria Nadia, 2023. "A comprehensive approach to assess transportation system resilience towards disruptive events. Case study on airside airport systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 109-122.
    6. Zheng, Shuai & Liu, Yugang & Lin, Yexin & Wang, Qiang & Yang, Hongtai & Chen, Bin, 2022. "Bridging strategy for the disruption of metro considering the reliability of transportation system: Metro and conventional bus network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    7. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2020. "A comprehensive method for the robustness assessment of high-speed rail network with operation data: A case in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 666-681.
    8. Liu, Enze & Barker, Kash & Chen, Hong, 2022. "A multi-modal evacuation-based response strategy for mitigating disruption in an intercity railway system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    9. Liu, Aijun & Li, Zengxian & Shang, Wen-Long & Ochieng, Washington, 2023. "Performance evaluation model of transportation infrastructure: Perspective of COVID-19," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Gonçalves, L.A.P.J. & Ribeiro, P.J.G., 2020. "Resilience of urban transportation systems. Concept, characteristics, and methods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Adel Mottahedi & Farhang Sereshki & Mohammad Ataei & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi, 2021. "The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    12. Milan Janić, 2018. "Modelling the resilience of rail passenger transport networks affected by large-scale disruptive events: the case of HSR (high speed rail)," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1101-1137, July.
    13. Yangyang Meng & Xiaofei Zhao & Jianzhong Liu & Qingjie Qi, 2023. "Dynamic Influence Analysis of the Important Station Evolution on the Resilience of Complex Metro Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Zhang, Hui & Xu, Min & Ouyang, Min, 2024. "A multi-perspective functionality loss assessment of coupled railway and airline systems under extreme events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    15. Pan, Shouzheng & Ling, Shuai & Jia, Ning & Liu, Yiliu & He, Zhengbing, 2024. "On the dynamic vulnerability of an urban rail transit system and the impact of human mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Szymula, Christopher & Bešinović, Nikola, 2020. "Passenger-centered vulnerability assessment of railway networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-61.
    17. Das, Laya & Munikoti, Sai & Natarajan, Balasubramaniam & Srinivasan, Babji, 2020. "Measuring smart grid resilience: Methods, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Hu, Jie & Wen, Weiping & Zhai, Changhai & Pei, Shunshun, 2024. "Post-earthquake functionality assessment for urban subway systems: Incorporating the combined effects of seismic performance of structural and non-structural systems and functional interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    19. Ma, Zhiao & Yang, Xin & Wu, Jianjun & Chen, Anthony & Wei, Yun & Gao, Ziyou, 2022. "Measuring the resilience of an urban rail transit network: A multi-dimensional evaluation model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 38-50.
    20. Liping Ge & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2022. "Robustness and disturbances in public transport," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 191-261, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:179:y:2024:i:c:s0965856423003336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.