IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v42y2008i10p1326-1339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of the performance of the European long intermodal freight trains (LIFTS)

Author

Listed:
  • Janic, Milan

Abstract

Intermodal rail/road freight transport has always been considered as a competitive alternative to its road freight counterpart in the European medium- to long-distance corridors (markets). Such consideration has been based on the increasing competitiveness of some innovative rail services and the existing and prospective performance of both modes in terms of the full social - internal or operational and external - costs. The most recent innovation of rail technologies and related services launched by some European railway companies, still at the conceptual level, is the Long Intermodal Freight Train (LIFT). This is supposed to be a block train operating in long-distance corridors (markets) with a substantial and regular freight demand. This paper develops analytical models for assessing the performance of the LIFTs, the already-operating Conventional Intermodal Freight Trains (CIFTs), and their road counterpart as well. The performance consists of the full - internal (private) and external - costs of the door-to-door delivery of loading units - containers, swap-bodies, and semi-trailers. The internal costs embrace the operational costs of the transport (rail and road) and intermodal terminal operators. The external costs include the costs of the impacts of door-to-door delivery of loading units on society and the environment. These negative externalities include noise, air pollution, traffic accidents, and congestion. The models are applied to a simplified version of intermodal and road transport system using inputs from the European freight transport sector. The aims are to compare the full costs of particular modalities in order to investigate the potential of the LIFTs as compared with the CIFTs in improving the internal efficiency of the rail freight sector and its competitiveness with respect to its road counterpart. In addition, the paper attempts to assess some effects on the potential modal shift of EU (European Union) transport policies on internalizing transport externalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Janic, Milan, 2008. "An assessment of the performance of the European long intermodal freight trains (LIFTS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1326-1339, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:42:y:2008:i:10:p:1326-1339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965-8564(08)00121-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ballis, Athanasios & Golias, John, 2002. "Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport terminals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 593-611, August.
    2. Hall, Randolph W., 1993. "Design for local area freight networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 79-95, April.
    3. Campbell, James F., 1990. "Freight consolidation and routing with transportation economies of scale," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 345-361, October.
    4. Morlok, Edward K. & Spasovic, Lazar N., 1994. "Redesigning Rail-Truck Intermodal Drayage Operations for Enhanced Service and Cost Performance," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 34(1).
    5. McCann, Philip, 2001. "A proof of the relationship between optimal vehicle size, haulage length and the structure of distance-transport costs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 671-693, September.
    6. Bontekoning, Y. M. & Macharis, C. & Trip, J. J., 2004. "Is a new applied transportation research field emerging?--A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-34, January.
    7. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1984. "The length of tours in zones of different shapes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 135-145, April.
    8. Tsamboulas, Dimitrios & Vrenken, Huub & Lekka, Anna-Maria, 2007. "Assessment of a transport policy potential for intermodal mode shift on a European scale," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 715-733, October.
    9. Jeong, Seung-Ju & Lee, Chi-Guhn & Bookbinder, James H., 2007. "The European freight railway system as a hub-and-spoke network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 523-536, July.
    10. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Newell, Gordon F., 1985. "Physical distribution from a warehouse: Vehicle coverage and inventory levels," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 397-407, October.
    11. Levinson, David & Gillen, David & Kanafani, Adib & Mathieu, Jean-michel, 1996. "The Full Cost Of Intercity Transportation - A Comparison Of High Speed Rail, Air And Highway Transportation In California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8mm50358, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    12. Blumenfeld, Dennis E. & Burns, Lawrence D. & Diltz, J. David & Daganzo, Carlos F., 1985. "Analyzing trade-offs between transportation, inventory and production costs on freight networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 361-380, October.
    13. Forkenbrock, David J., 2001. "Comparison of external costs of rail and truck freight transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 321-337, May.
    14. Hall, Randolph W., 1987. "Direct versus terminal freight routing on a network with concave costs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 287-298, August.
    15. Niérat, Patrick, 1997. "Market area of rail-truck terminals: Pertinence of the spatial theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 109-127, March.
    16. Nozick, Linda K. & Morlok, Edward K., 1997. "A model for medium-term operations planning in an intermodal rail-truck service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 91-107, March.
    17. Milan Janic, 2001. "Integrated transport systems in the European Union: An overview of some recent developments," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 469-497, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Woodburn, Allan, 2013. "Effects of rail network enhancement on port hinterland container activity: a United Kingdom case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 162-169.
    2. Aalok Kumar & Ramesh Anbanandam, 2020. "A Flexible Policy Framework for Analysing Multimodal Freight Transportation System in India: SAP–LAP and Efficient IRP Method," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 35-52, March.
    3. Dan Liu & Zhenghong Deng & Qipeng Sun & Yong Wang & Yinhai Wang, 2019. "Design and Freight Corridor-Fleet Size Choice in Collaborative Intermodal Transportation Network Considering Economies of Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Hamid Saeedi & Bart Wiegmans & Behzad Behdani, 2021. "Measuring concentration in transhipment markets: methodologies and application to a European case," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 548-568, September.
    5. Frank Troch & Thierry Vanelslander & Christa Sys & Florent Laroche & Angel Merchan & Martine Mostert & Vidar Stevens & Christine Tawfik & Sandra Belboom & Angelique Leonard & Sabine Limbourg & Koen Ve, 2017. "A road map for explorative scenario creation on Belgian rail freight transport development," Post-Print hal-01745735, HAL.
    6. Nam Seok Kim & Byungkyu Park & Kang-Dae Lee, 2016. "A knowledge based freight management decision support system incorporating economies of scale: multimodal minimum cost flow optimization approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 81-94, March.
    7. Jiahao Zhao & Xiaoning Zhu & Li Wang, 2020. "Study on Scheme of Outbound Railway Container Organization in Rail-Water Intermodal Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Miguel Puente‐Ajovín & Fernando Sanz‐Gracia, 2021. "Transport costs in new economic geography models: A more realistic approach," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 17(3), pages 221-233, September.
    9. Bouchery, Yann & Woxenius, Johan & Fransoo, Jan C., 2020. "Identifying the market areas of port-centric logistics and hinterland intermodal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 599-611.
    10. Truschkin, Eugen & Elbert, Ralf, 2013. "Horizontal transshipment technologies as enablers of combined transport: Impact of transport policies on the modal split," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 91-109.
    11. Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2020. "Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 559-581.
    12. Marzano, Vittorio & Tocchi, Daniela & Papola, Andrea & Aponte, Dario & Simonelli, Fulvio & Cascetta, Ennio, 2018. "Incentives to freight railway undertakings compensating for infrastructural gaps: Methodology and practical application to Italy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 177-188.
    13. Ferrari, Paolo, 2018. "Some necessary conditions for the success of innovations in rail freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 747-758.
    14. Saeedi, Hamid & Wiegmans, Bart & Behdani, Behzad & Zuidwijk, Rob, 2017. "European intermodal freight transport network: Market structure analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 141-154.
    15. Kim, Nam Seok & Van Wee, Bert, 2011. "The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 859-875.
    16. Basallo-Triana, Mario José & Bravo-Bastidas, Juan José & Vidal-Holguín, Carlos Julio, 2022. "A rail-road transshipment yard picture," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Nathathai Krebs, 2019. "Optimal Route in International Transportation of Thailand � Guangxi (China)," GATR Journals gjbssr527, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    18. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    19. Chen, Hong & Cullinane, Kevin & Liu, Nan, 2017. "Developing a model for measuring the resilience of a port-hinterland container transportation network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 282-301.
    20. Elifcan Göçmen & Rızvan Erol, 2018. "The Problem of Sustainable Intermodal Transportation: A Case Study of an International Logistics Company, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    21. Martine Mostert & An Caris & Sabine Limbourg, 2018. "Intermodal network design: a three-mode bi-objective model applied to the case of Belgium," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 397-420, September.
    22. Meisel, Frank & Kirschstein, Thomas & Bierwirth, Christian, 2013. "Integrated production and intermodal transportation planning in large scale production–distribution-networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 62-78.
    23. Frank Troch & Thierry Vanelslander & Christa Sys & Florent Laroche & Angel Merchan & Martine Mostert & Vidar Stevens & Christine Tawfik & Sandra Belboom & Angélique Léonard & Sabine Limbourg & Koen , 2017. "A road map for explorative scenario creation on Belgian rail freight transport development," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 18(1-2), pages 3-21, March.
    24. Pérez-Martínez, P.J. & Vassallo-Magro, J.M., 2013. "Changes in the external costs of freight surface transport In Spain," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 61-76.
    25. Tomas Ambra & An Caris & Cathy Macharis, 2019. "Should I Stay or Should I Go? Assessing Intermodal and Synchromodal Resilience from a Decentralized Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Langevin, André & Mbaraga, Pontien & Campbell, James F., 1996. "Continuous approximation models in freight distribution: An overview," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 163-188, June.
    2. Anna Franceschetti & Ola Jabali & Gilbert Laporte, 2017. "Continuous approximation models in freight distribution management," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(3), pages 413-433, October.
    3. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    4. Kim, Nam Seok & Van Wee, Bert, 2011. "The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 859-875.
    5. Bouchery, Yann & Fransoo, Jan, 2015. "Cost, carbon emissions and modal shift in intermodal network design decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 388-399.
    6. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    7. Smid, Martijn & Dekker, Sander & Wiegmans, Bart, 2016. "Modeling the cost sensitivity of intermodal inland waterway terminals: A scenario based approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 112-122.
    8. Y Bouchery & Jan C Fransoo, 2015. "Cost, carbon emissions and modal shift in intermodal network design decisions," Post-Print hal-01954452, HAL.
    9. Reis, Vasco & Fabian Meier, J. & Pace, Giuseppe & Palacin, Roberto, 2013. "Rail and multi-modal transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 17-30.
    10. Tapiador, Francisco J. & Burckhart, Kerstin & Martí-Henneberg, Jordi, 2009. "Characterizing European high speed train stations using intermodal time and entropy metrics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 197-208, February.
    11. Peterson, Steven, 2005. "Factors Influencing Inter-Modal Facility Location Decisions: Comparison of Different Empirical Estimation Procedures," 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Washington, D.C., March 6-8, 2005 208177, Transportation Research Forum.
    12. Dong, Chuanwen & Transchel, Sandra, 2020. "A dual sourcing inventory model for modal split transport: Structural properties and optimal solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 883-900.
    13. Luca Bertazzi & Maria Grazia Speranza & Walter Ukovich, 2000. "Exact and Heuristic Solutions for a Shipment Problem with Given Frequencies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(7), pages 973-988, July.
    14. Sarhadi, Hassan & Tulett, David M. & Verma, Manish, 2017. "An analytical approach to the protection planning of a rail intermodal terminal network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 511-525.
    15. Reis, Vasco, 2015. "Should we keep on renaming a +35-year-old baby?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 173-179.
    16. Liao, Chun-Hsiung & Tseng, Po-Hsing & Cullinane, Kevin & Lu, Chin-Shan, 2010. "The impact of an emerging port on the carbon dioxide emissions of inland container transport: An empirical study of Taipei port," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5251-5257, September.
    17. Verma, Manish & Verter, Vedat, 2010. "A lead-time based approach for planning rail-truck intermodal transportation of dangerous goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 696-706, May.
    18. Sarah Root & Amy Cohn, 2008. "A novel modeling approach for express package carrier planning," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 670-683, October.
    19. Abate, Megersa & de Jong, Gerard, 2014. "The optimal shipment size and truck size choice – The allocation of trucks across hauls," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 262-277.
    20. Truschkin, Eugen & Elbert, Ralf, 2013. "Horizontal transshipment technologies as enablers of combined transport: Impact of transport policies on the modal split," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 91-109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:42:y:2008:i:10:p:1326-1339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.