IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i12p2259-d466026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Picture Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Risk Assessment of Railway Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Simić

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11010 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Radovan Soušek

    (Faculty of Transport Engineering, University of Pardubice, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

  • Stefan Jovčić

    (Faculty of Transport Engineering, University of Pardubice, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

To increase the level of safety and prevent significant accidents, it is essential to prioritize risk factors and assess railway infrastructure. The key question is how to identify unsafe railway infrastructure so authorities can undertake safety improvement projects on time. The paper aims to introduce a picture fuzzy group multi-criteria decision-making approach for risk assessment of railway infrastructure. Firstly, picture fuzzy sets are employed for representing and handling risk-related information. Secondly, a picture fuzzy hybrid method based on the direct rating, and Tsallis–Havrda–Charvát entropy is provided to prioritize risk factors. Thirdly, a picture fuzzy measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution method is developed to rank railway infrastructures. Lastly, the formulated approach is implemented in the Czech Republic context. Two sensitivity analyses verified the high robustness of the formulated approach. The comparative analysis with five state-of-the-art picture fuzzy approaches approved its high reliability. Compared to the state-of-the-art picture fuzzy approaches, the provided three-parametric approach has superior flexibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Simić & Radovan Soušek & Stefan Jovčić, 2020. "Picture Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Risk Assessment of Railway Infrastructure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:12:p:2259-:d:466026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/12/2259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/12/2259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu-Hui Li & Lin Huang & Qiang Li & Hu-Chen Liu, 2020. "Passenger Satisfaction Evaluation of Public Transportation Using Pythagorean Fuzzy MULTIMOORA Method under Large Group Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Bobo Zhao & Tao Tang & Bin Ning, 2016. "Applying Hybrid Decision-Making Method Based on Fuzzy AHP-WOWA Operator for Emergency Alternative Evaluation of Unattended Train Operation Metro System," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-12, February.
    3. Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2020. "Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 559-581.
    4. Aydin, Nezir & Celik, Erkan & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2015. "A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 61-81.
    5. Guiwu Wei, 2018. "Uncertain Hamacher Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Decision Making," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 40-64, April.
    6. Peide Liu & Peng Wang, 2017. "Some Improved Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Applications to Multiple-Attribute Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 817-850, May.
    7. Svetla Stoilova & Nolberto Munier & Martin Kendra & Tomáš Skrúcaný, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Railway Network Performance in Countries of the TEN-T Orient–East Med Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Liangliang Song & Qiming Li & George F. List & Yongliang Deng & Ping Lu, 2017. "Using an AHP-ISM Based Method to Study the Vulnerability Factors of Urban Rail Transit System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Celik, Erkan & Aydin, Nezir & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2014. "A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 283-293.
    10. Alptekin Ulutaş & Darjan Karabasevic & Gabrijela Popovic & Dragisa Stanujkic & Phong Thanh Nguyen & Çağatay Karaköy, 2020. "Development of a Novel Integrated CCSD-ITARA-MARCOS Decision-Making Approach for Stackers Selection in a Logistics System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Guiwu Wei, 2016. "Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 491-502, July.
    12. Eva Brumercikova & Adrian Sperka, 2020. "Problems of Access to Services at Railway Stations in Freight Transport in the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladimir Simic & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh & Abtin Ijadi Maghsoodi, 2023. "Locating a disinfection facility for hazardous healthcare waste in the COVID-19 era: a novel approach based on Fermatean fuzzy ITARA-MARCOS and random forest recursive feature elimination algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 1105-1150, September.
    2. Ulaş Ünlü & Neşe Yalçın & Nuri Avşarlıgil, 2022. "Analysis of Efficiency and Productivity of Commercial Banks in Turkey Pre- and during COVID-19 with an Integrated MCDM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane & Qiu, Yanjun & Stević, Željko & Simić, Vladimir, 2023. "Assessment of alternative railway systems for sustainable transportation using an integrated IRN SWARA and IRN CoCoSo model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane & Qiu, Yanjun & Stević, Željko & Simić, Vladimir, 2023. "Assessment of alternative railway systems for sustainable transportation using an integrated IRN SWARA and IRN CoCoSo model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Suizhi Luo & Lining Xing, 2019. "Picture Fuzzy Interaction Partitioned Heronian Aggregation Operators for Hotel Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Siqi Zhang & Hui Gao & Guiwu Wei & Yu Wei & Cun Wei, 2019. "Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution Method for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making under Picture 2-Tuple Linguistic Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Shouzhen Zeng & Shahzaib Asharf & Muhammad Arif & Saleem Abdullah, 2019. "Application of Exponential Jensen Picture Fuzzy Divergence Measure in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Meiling Liu & Shouzhen Zeng & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Picture Fuzzy Weighted Distance Measures and their Application to Investment Selection," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 682-682, August.
    6. Guirao, Begoña & García-Pastor, Antonio & López-Lambas, María Eugenia, 2016. "The importance of service quality attributes in public transportation: Narrowing the gap between scientific research and practitioners' needs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 68-77.
    7. Shouzhen Zeng & Jianping Chen & Xingsen Li, 2016. "A Hybrid Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 403-422, March.
    8. Jiahuan He & Xindi Wang & Runtong Zhang & Li Li, 2019. "Some q -Rung Picture Fuzzy Dombi Hamy Mean Operators with Their Application to Project Assessment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Mingwei Lin & Jiuhan Wei & Zeshui Xu & Riqing Chen, 2018. "Multiattribute Group Decision-Making Based on Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Interaction Partitioned Bonferroni Mean Aggregation Operators," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-24, November.
    10. Aydin, Nezir, 2017. "A fuzzy-based multi-dimensional and multi-period service quality evaluation outline for rail transit systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 87-98.
    11. Machado-León, José Luis & de Oña, Rocío & Baouni, Tahar & de Oña, Juan, 2017. "Railway transit services in Algiers: priority improvement actions based on users perceptions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 175-185.
    12. Gia Sirbiladze, 2021. "Associated Probabilities in Interactive MADM under Discrimination q-Rung Picture Linguistic Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-36, September.
    13. Sanjib Biswas & Dragan Pamucar, 2023. "A modified EDAS model for comparison of mobile wallet service providers in India," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-31, December.
    14. Amirali Soltanpour & Mahmoud Mesbah & Meeghat Habibian, 2020. "Customer satisfaction in urban rail: a study on transferability of structural equation models," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 123-146, March.
    15. Yuning Wang & Zhe Zhang & Mengyuan Zhu & Hexian Wang, 2020. "The Impact of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction on Reuse Intention in Urban Rail Transit in Tianjin, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    16. Marzena Kramarz & Katarzyna Dohn & Edyta Przybylska & Lilla Knop, 2020. "Scenarios for the Development of Multimodal Transport in the TRITIA Cross-Border Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-41, August.
    17. Nassereddine, M. & Eskandari, H., 2017. "An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 427-439.
    18. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    19. Yung-Tsan Jou & Charmine Sheena Saflor & Klint Allen Mariñas & Michael Nayat Young, 2023. "Determining Factors Affecting Perceived Customer Satisfaction on Public Utility Bus System in Occidental Mindoro, Philippines: A Case Study on Service Quality Assessment during Major Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Agata Marcysiak, 2020. "Analysis of the Rail Transport Market in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 819-832.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:12:p:2259-:d:466026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.