IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v135y2020icp9-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishment process of a magic trait allele subject to both divergent selection and assortative mating

Author

Listed:
  • Sakamoto, T.
  • Innan, H.

Abstract

Sexual selection and divergent selection are among the major driving forces of reproductive isolation, which could eventually result in speciation. A magic trait is defined such that a single trait is subject to both divergent selection and mate choice through phenotype-based assortative mating. We are here interested in the evolutionary behavior of alleles at a genetic locus responsible for a magic trait in a finite population. We assume that, in a pair of homogeneous subpopulations, a mutant allele arises at the magic trait locus, and theoretically obtain the probability that the new allele establishes in the population, or the establishment probability. We also show an analytical expression for the trajectory of allele frequency along the establishment, from which the time required for the establishment is obtained, or the establishment time. Under this model, divergent selection simply favors the new allele to fix where it is beneficial, whereas assortative mating works against rare alleles. It is theoretically demonstrated that the fate of the new allele is determined by the relative contributions of the two selective forces, divergent selection and assortative mating, when the allele is rare so that the two selective forces counteract. Our theoretical results for the establishment probability and time allow us to understand the relative role of random genetic drift in the establishment process of a magic trait allele in a finite population.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakamoto, T. & Innan, H., 2020. "Establishment process of a magic trait allele subject to both divergent selection and assortative mating," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 9-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:135:y:2020:i:c:p:9-18
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2020.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580920300484
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2020.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. U. Dieckmann & M. Doebeli, 1999. "On the Origin of Species by Sympatric Speciation," Working Papers ir99013, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    2. Newberry, Mitchell G. & McCandlish, David M. & Plotkin, Joshua B., 2016. "Assortative mating can impede or facilitate fixation of underdominant alleles," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 14-21.
    3. Ulf Dieckmann & Michael Doebeli, 1999. "On the origin of species by sympatric speciation," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6742), pages 354-357, July.
    4. M. Higashi & G. Takimoto & N. Yamamura, 1999. "Sympatric speciation by sexual selection," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6761), pages 523-526, December.
    5. Michael Doebeli & Ulf Dieckmann, 2003. "Speciation along environmental gradients," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6920), pages 259-264, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Åke Brännström & Jacob Johansson & Niels Von Festenberg, 2013. "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Adaptive Dynamics," Games, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-25, June.
    2. José Camacho Mateu & Matteo Sireci & Miguel A Muñoz, 2021. "Phenotypic-dependent variability and the emergence of tolerance in bacterial populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Rettelbach, Agnes & Hermisson, Joachim & Dieckmann, Ulf & Kopp, Michael, 2011. "Effects of genetic architecture on the evolution of assortative mating under frequency-dependent disruptive selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 82-96.
    4. Alexandros Rigos & Heinrich H. Nax, 2015. "Assortativity evolving from social dilemmas," Discussion Papers in Economics 15/19, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    5. Chaianunporn, Thotsapol & Hovestadt, Thomas, 2012. "Concurrent evolution of random dispersal and habitat niche width in host-parasitoid systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 241-250.
    6. Michael B. Doud & Animesh Gupta & Victor Li & Sarah J. Medina & Caesar A. Fuente & Justin R. Meyer, 2024. "Competition-driven eco-evolutionary feedback reshapes bacteriophage lambda’s fitness landscape and enables speciation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Bagnoli, Franco & Guardiani, Carlo, 2005. "A model of sympatric speciation through assortative mating," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 347(C), pages 534-574.
    8. Bhattacharyay, A. & Drossel, B., 2005. "Modeling coevolution and sympatric speciation of flowers and pollinators," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 345(1), pages 159-172.
    9. Cook, James N. & Oono, Y., 2010. "Competitive localization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(9), pages 1849-1860.
    10. Cecilia Berardo & Iulia Martina Bulai & Ezio Venturino, 2021. "Interactions Obtained from Basic Mechanistic Principles: Prey Herds and Predators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Davison, Raziel & Stadman, Marc & Jongejans, Eelke, 2019. "Stochastic effects contribute to population fitness differences," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 1-1.
    12. E. Kisdi & S.A.H. Geritz, 1999. "Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation in Diploid Populations," Working Papers ir99048, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    13. Omori, Koji & Ohnishi, Hidejiro & Hamaoka, Hideki & Kunihiro, Tadao & Ito, Sayaka & Kuwae, Michinobu & Hata, Hiroki & Miller, Todd W. & Iguchi, Keiichiro, 2012. "Speciation of fluvial forms from amphidromous forms of migratory populations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 89-94.
    14. Troost, T.A. & Kooi, B.W. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2007. "Bifurcation analysis of ecological and evolutionary processes in ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 253-268.
    15. Zu, Jian & Wang, Jinliang, 2013. "Adaptive evolution of attack ability promotes the evolutionary branching of predator species," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-23.
    16. Zvi Drezner & Taly Dawn Drezner, 2020. "Biologically Inspired Parent Selection in Genetic Algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 161-183, April.
    17. Débarre, Florence & Otto, Sarah P., 2016. "Evolutionary dynamics of a quantitative trait in a finite asexual population," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 75-88.
    18. Jonathan Newton, 2017. "The preferences of Homo Moralis are unstable under evolving assortativity," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 583-589, May.
    19. Blath, Jochen & Paul, Tobias & Tóbiás, András & Wilke Berenguer, Maite, 2024. "The impact of dormancy on evolutionary branching," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 66-76.
    20. Boettiger, Carl & Dushoff, Jonathan & Weitz, Joshua S., 2010. "Fluctuation domains in adaptive evolution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 6-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:135:y:2020:i:c:p:9-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.