IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v76y2009i1p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization under frequency-dependent selection

Author

Listed:
  • Matessi, Carlo
  • Schneider, Kristan A.

Abstract

We consider a model of frequency-dependent selection, which we refer to as the Wildcard Model. A variety of more specific models, representing quite diverse biological situations, are covered by the Wildcard Model as particular cases. Two very different particular models that are subsumed by the Wildcard Model are the game theoretically motivated two-phenotype model of Lessard [Lessard, S.,1984. Evolutionary dynamics in frequency-dependent two-phenotype models, Theor. Popul. Biol. 25, 210–234], and the model of selection on a continuous trait due to intraspecific competition of Bürger [Bürger, R., 2005. A multilocus analysis of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a quantitative trait. J. Math. Biol. 50 (4), 355–396] and Schneider [Schneider, K.A., 2006. A multilocus-multiallele analysis of frequency-dependent selection induced by intraspecific competition. J. Math. Biol. 52 (4), 483–523]. Both these models have been shown in the past to have a global Lyapunov function (LF) under appropriate genetic assumptions. We show that (i) the Wildcard Model in continuous time for a single multiallelic locus, or for multiple multiallelic loci in linkage equilibrium, has a global LF, of which the Lessard and Bürger–Scheneider LF are special cases in spite of their widely different biological interpretations; (ii) the LF of the Wildcard Model can be derived from an LF previously identified for a model of density- and frequency-dependent selection due to Lotka–Volterra competition, with one locus, multiple alleles, multiple species and continuous-time dynamics [Matessi, C., Jayakar, S.D., 1981. Coevolution of species in competition: A theoretical study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78 (2, part2), 1081–1084]. We extend the LF with density and frequency dependence to the multilocus case with linkage-equilibrium dynamics. As a possible application of our results, the optimization principle we established can be used as a tool in the study of long-term evolution of various models subsumed by the Wildcard Model based on explicit short-term dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Matessi, Carlo & Schneider, Kristan A., 2009. "Optimization under frequency-dependent selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 1-12.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:76:y:2009:i:1:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2009.02.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580909000239
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2009.02.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulf Dieckmann & Michael Doebeli, 1999. "On the origin of species by sympatric speciation," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6742), pages 354-357, July.
    2. U. Dieckmann & M. Doebeli, 1999. "On the Origin of Species by Sympatric Speciation," Working Papers ir99013, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    3. M. Doebeli & U. Dieckmann, 2000. "Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation Caused by Different Types of Ecological Interactions," Working Papers ir00040, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    4. Schneider, Kristan A., 2008. "Maximization principles for frequency-dependent selection I: the one-locus two-allele case," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 251-262.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bagnoli, Franco & Guardiani, Carlo, 2005. "A model of sympatric speciation through assortative mating," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 347(C), pages 534-574.
    2. Bhattacharyay, A. & Drossel, B., 2005. "Modeling coevolution and sympatric speciation of flowers and pollinators," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 345(1), pages 159-172.
    3. Cook, James N. & Oono, Y., 2010. "Competitive localization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(9), pages 1849-1860.
    4. José Camacho Mateu & Matteo Sireci & Miguel A Muñoz, 2021. "Phenotypic-dependent variability and the emergence of tolerance in bacterial populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-28, September.
    5. Troost, T.A. & Kooi, B.W. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2007. "Bifurcation analysis of ecological and evolutionary processes in ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 253-268.
    6. Zu, Jian & Wang, Jinliang, 2013. "Adaptive evolution of attack ability promotes the evolutionary branching of predator species," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-23.
    7. Débarre, Florence & Otto, Sarah P., 2016. "Evolutionary dynamics of a quantitative trait in a finite asexual population," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 75-88.
    8. Nurmi, Tuomas & Parvinen, Kalle, 2008. "On the evolution of specialization with a mechanistic underpinning in structured metapopulations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 222-243.
    9. Åke Brännström & Jacob Johansson & Niels Von Festenberg, 2013. "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Adaptive Dynamics," Games, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Alexandros Rigos & Heinrich H. Nax, 2015. "Assortativity evolving from social dilemmas," Discussion Papers in Economics 15/19, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    11. Chaianunporn, Thotsapol & Hovestadt, Thomas, 2012. "Concurrent evolution of random dispersal and habitat niche width in host-parasitoid systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 241-250.
    12. Michael B. Doud & Animesh Gupta & Victor Li & Sarah J. Medina & Caesar A. Fuente & Justin R. Meyer, 2024. "Competition-driven eco-evolutionary feedback reshapes bacteriophage lambda’s fitness landscape and enables speciation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Sakamoto, T. & Innan, H., 2020. "Establishment process of a magic trait allele subject to both divergent selection and assortative mating," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 9-18.
    14. Cecilia Berardo & Iulia Martina Bulai & Ezio Venturino, 2021. "Interactions Obtained from Basic Mechanistic Principles: Prey Herds and Predators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Davison, Raziel & Stadman, Marc & Jongejans, Eelke, 2019. "Stochastic effects contribute to population fitness differences," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 1-1.
    16. E. Kisdi & S.A.H. Geritz, 1999. "Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation in Diploid Populations," Working Papers ir99048, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    17. Zvi Drezner & Taly Dawn Drezner, 2020. "Biologically Inspired Parent Selection in Genetic Algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 161-183, April.
    18. Jonathan Newton, 2017. "The preferences of Homo Moralis are unstable under evolving assortativity," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 583-589, May.
    19. Blath, Jochen & Paul, Tobias & Tóbiás, András & Wilke Berenguer, Maite, 2024. "The impact of dormancy on evolutionary branching," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 66-76.
    20. Boettiger, Carl & Dushoff, Jonathan & Weitz, Joshua S., 2010. "Fluctuation domains in adaptive evolution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 6-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:76:y:2009:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.