IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v124y2018icp51-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assortative mating on complex traits revisited: Double first cousins and the X-chromosome

Author

Listed:
  • Yengo, Loic
  • Visscher, Peter M.

Abstract

Mate choice through direct assortment on heritable traits, assortative mating (AM), is predicted in theory to inflate the genetic variance in a population and the correlation between relatives. Here, we revisit the theory of AM, first established in the landmark 1918 paper from RA Fisher, and provide new theory and analytical results. In particular, we shed light on inconsistencies in the literature regarding the correlation between double first cousins under AM and provide a solution. We derive new theory for AM due to X-chromosome loci. We show in the latter case that the inflation of genetic variance induced under AM is twice as large in females compared to males. These two theoretical contributions are verified and illustrated through simulations. We also provide a more general unified framework for the correlation between relatives in a non-inbred population.

Suggested Citation

  • Yengo, Loic & Visscher, Peter M., 2018. "Assortative mating on complex traits revisited: Double first cousins and the X-chromosome," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 51-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:124:y:2018:i:c:p:51-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2018.09.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580918301060
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2018.09.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loic Yengo & Matthew R. Robinson & Matthew C. Keller & Kathryn E. Kemper & Yuanhao Yang & Maciej Trzaskowski & Jacob Gratten & Patrick Turley & David Cesarini & Daniel J. Benjamin & Naomi R. Wray & Mi, 2018. "Imprint of assortative mating on the human genome," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 948-954, December.
    2. Barton, N.H. & Etheridge, A.M. & Véber, A., 2017. "The infinitesimal model: Definition, derivation, and implications," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 50-73.
    3. Teri A. Manolio, 2017. "A decade of shared genomic associations," Nature, Nature, vol. 546(7658), pages 360-361, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goldberg, Amy & Rastogi, Ananya & Rosenberg, Noah A., 2020. "Assortative mating by population of origin in a mechanistic model of admixture," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 129-146.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barton, N.H. & Etheridge, A.M., 2018. "Establishment in a new habitat by polygenic adaptation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 110-127.
    2. Steiner, Ulrich K. & Tuljapurkar, Shripad, 2020. "Drivers of diversity in individual life courses: Sensitivity of the population entropy of a Markov chain," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 159-167.
    3. Manuel Plate & Richard Bernstein & Andreas Hoppe & Kaspar Bienefeld, 2019. "Comparison of infinitesimal and finite locus models for long-term breeding simulations with direct and maternal effects at the example of honeybees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Dekens, L. & Otto, S.P. & Calvez, V., 2022. "The best of both worlds: Combining population genetic and quantitative genetic models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 49-75.
    5. Fartein Ask Torvik & Espen Moen Eilertsen & Laurie J. Hannigan & Rosa Cheesman & Laurence J. Howe & Per Magnus & Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud & Ole A. Andreassen & Pål R. Njølstad & Alexandra Havdahl & Eiv, 2022. "Modeling assortative mating and genetic similarities between partners, siblings, and in-laws," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Kenichi Yamamoto & Kyuto Sonehara & Shinichi Namba & Takahiro Konuma & Hironori Masuko & Satoru Miyawaki & Yoichiro Kamatani & Nobuyuki Hizawa & Keiichi Ozono & Loic Yengo & Yukinori Okada, 2023. "Genetic footprints of assortative mating in the Japanese population," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 65-73, January.
    7. González-Forero, Mauricio, 2024. "A mathematical framework for evo-devo dynamics," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 24-50.
    8. Parsons, Todd L. & Ralph, Peter L., 2024. "Large effects and the infinitesimal model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 117-129.
    9. Olivier David & Arnaud Le Rouzic & Christine Dillmann, 2022. "Optimization of sampling designs for pedigrees and association studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1056-1066, September.
    10. Hans Fredrik Sunde & Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal & Rosa Cheesman & Elizabeth C. Corfield & Thomas H. Kleppesto & Anne Caroline Seierstad & Eivind Ystrom & Espen Moen Eilertsen & Fartein Ask Torvik, 2024. "Genetic similarity between relatives provides evidence on the presence and history of assortative mating," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. David, Olivier & van Frank, Gaëlle & Goldringer, Isabelle & Rivière, Pierre & Turbet Delof, Michel, 2020. "Bayesian inference of natural selection from spatiotemporal phenotypic data," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 100-109.
    12. Jennifer Sjaarda & Zoltán Kutalik, 2023. "Partner choice, confounding and trait convergence all contribute to phenotypic partner similarity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 776-789, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:124:y:2018:i:c:p:51-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.