IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-46939-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic similarity between relatives provides evidence on the presence and history of assortative mating

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Fredrik Sunde

    (Norwegian Institute of Public Health
    University of Oslo)

  • Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal

    (University of Oslo)

  • Rosa Cheesman

    (University of Oslo)

  • Elizabeth C. Corfield

    (Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health)

  • Thomas H. Kleppesto

    (Norwegian Institute of Public Health
    Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Anne Caroline Seierstad

    (University of Oslo)

  • Eivind Ystrom

    (University of Oslo
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health)

  • Espen Moen Eilertsen

    (University of Oslo)

  • Fartein Ask Torvik

    (Norwegian Institute of Public Health
    University of Oslo)

Abstract

Assortative mating – the non-random mating of individuals with similar traits – is known to increase trait-specific genetic variance and genetic similarity between relatives. However, empirical evidence is limited for many traits, and the implications hinge on whether assortative mating has started recently or many generations ago. Here we show theoretically and empirically that genetic similarity between relatives can provide evidence on the presence and history of assortative mating. First, we employed path analysis to understand how assortative mating affects genetic similarity between family members across generations, finding that similarity between distant relatives is more affected than close relatives. Next, we correlated polygenic indices of 47,135 co-parents from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and found genetic evidence of assortative mating in nine out of sixteen examined traits. The same traits showed elevated similarity between relatives, especially distant relatives. Six of the nine traits, including educational attainment, showed greater genetic variance among offspring, which is inconsistent with stable assortative mating over many generations. These results suggest an ongoing increase in familial similarity for these traits. The implications of this research extend to genetic methodology and the understanding of social and economic disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Fredrik Sunde & Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal & Rosa Cheesman & Elizabeth C. Corfield & Thomas H. Kleppesto & Anne Caroline Seierstad & Eivind Ystrom & Espen Moen Eilertsen & Fartein Ask Torvik, 2024. "Genetic similarity between relatives provides evidence on the presence and history of assortative mating," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-46939-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46939-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-46939-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-46939-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew R. Robinson & Aaron Kleinman & Mariaelisa Graff & Anna A. E. Vinkhuyzen & David Couper & Michael B. Miller & Wouter J. Peyrot & Abdel Abdellaoui & Brendan P. Zietsch & Ilja M. Nolte & Jana V. , 2017. "Genetic evidence of assortative mating in humans," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Fartein Ask Torvik & Espen Moen Eilertsen & Laurie J. Hannigan & Rosa Cheesman & Laurence J. Howe & Per Magnus & Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud & Ole A. Andreassen & Pål R. Njølstad & Alexandra Havdahl & Eiv, 2022. "Modeling assortative mating and genetic similarities between partners, siblings, and in-laws," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Adrian Adermon & Mikael Lindahl & Mårten Palme, 2021. "Dynastic Human Capital, Inequality, and Intergenerational Mobility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(5), pages 1523-1548, May.
    4. Richard Border & Sean O’Rourke & Teresa de Candia & Michael E. Goddard & Peter M. Visscher & Loic Yengo & Matt Jones & Matthew C. Keller, 2022. "Author Correction: Assortative mating biases marker-based heritability estimators," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, December.
    5. Jeremy Greenwood & Nezih Guner & Georgi Kocharkov & Cezar Santos, 2014. "Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 348-353, May.
    6. Perline A. Demange & Jouke Jan Hottenga & Abdel Abdellaoui & Espen Moen Eilertsen & Margherita Malanchini & Benjamin W. Domingue & Emma Armstrong-Carter & Eveline L. Zeeuw & Kaili Rimfeld & Dorret I. , 2022. "Estimating effects of parents’ cognitive and non-cognitive skills on offspring education using polygenic scores," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Lasse Eika & Magne Mogstad & Basit Zafar, 2019. "Educational Assortative Mating and Household Income Inequality," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 2795-2835.
    8. Gunn Elisabeth Birkelund & Johan Heldal, 2003. "Who marries whom? Educational homogamy in Norway," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30.
    9. Jennifer Sjaarda & Zoltán Kutalik, 2023. "Partner choice, confounding and trait convergence all contribute to phenotypic partner similarity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 776-789, May.
    10. Richard Border & Sean O’Rourke & Teresa de Candia & Michael E. Goddard & Peter M. Visscher & Loic Yengo & Matt Jones & Matthew C. Keller, 2022. "Assortative mating biases marker-based heritability estimators," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Teri A. Manolio & Francis S. Collins & Nancy J. Cox & David B. Goldstein & Lucia A. Hindorff & David J. Hunter & Mark I. McCarthy & Erin M. Ramos & Lon R. Cardon & Aravinda Chakravarti & Judy H. Cho &, 2009. "Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases," Nature, Nature, vol. 461(7265), pages 747-753, October.
    12. Loic Yengo & Matthew R. Robinson & Matthew C. Keller & Kathryn E. Kemper & Yuanhao Yang & Maciej Trzaskowski & Jacob Gratten & Patrick Turley & David Cesarini & Daniel J. Benjamin & Naomi R. Wray & Mi, 2018. "Imprint of assortative mating on the human genome," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 948-954, December.
    13. Tanya B. Horwitz & Jared V. Balbona & Katie N. Paulich & Matthew C. Keller, 2023. "Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 1568-1583, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans Kippersluis & Pietro Biroli & Rita Dias Pereira & Titus J. Galama & Stephanie Hinke & S. Fleur W. Meddens & Dilnoza Muslimova & Eric A. W. Slob & Ronald Vlaming & Cornelius A. Rietveld, 2023. "Overcoming attenuation bias in regressions using polygenic indices," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Jennifer Sjaarda & Zoltán Kutalik, 2023. "Partner choice, confounding and trait convergence all contribute to phenotypic partner similarity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(5), pages 776-789, May.
    3. Fartein Ask Torvik & Espen Moen Eilertsen & Laurie J. Hannigan & Rosa Cheesman & Laurence J. Howe & Per Magnus & Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud & Ole A. Andreassen & Pål R. Njølstad & Alexandra Havdahl & Eiv, 2022. "Modeling assortative mating and genetic similarities between partners, siblings, and in-laws," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Tabea Schoeler & Doug Speed & Eleonora Porcu & Nicola Pirastu & Jean-Baptiste Pingault & Zoltán Kutalik, 2023. "Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1216-1227, July.
    5. Anton A. Cheremukhin & Paulina Restrepo-Echavarria & Antonella Tutino, 2023. "Marriage Market Sorting in the U.S," Working Papers 2023-023, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    6. Nie, Haifeng & Xing, Chunbing, 2019. "Education expansion, assortative marriage, and income inequality in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 37-51.
    7. Rania Gihleb & Kevin Lang, 2020. "Educational Homogamy and Assortative Mating Have Not Increased," Research in Labor Economics, in: Change at Home, in the Labor Market, and On the Job, volume 48, pages 1-26, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    8. Pierre‐André Chiappori & Monica Costa‐Dias & Sam Crossman & Costas Meghir, 2020. "Changes in Assortative Matching and Inequality in Income: Evidence for the UK," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 39-63, March.
    9. Doepke, M. & Tertilt, M., 2016. "Families in Macroeconomics," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & Harald Uhlig (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1789-1891, Elsevier.
    10. Nitin Kumar Bharti, 2018. "Wealth Inequality, Class and Caste in India, 1961-2012," World Inequality Lab Working Papers hal-02878149, HAL.
    11. Almar, Frederik & Schulz, Bastian, 2024. "Optimal weights for marital sorting measures," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    12. Neyt, Brecht & Vandenbulcke, Sarah & Baert, Stijn, 2018. "Education Level and Mating Success: Undercover on Tinder," IZA Discussion Papers 11933, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Arnaud Dupuy & Simon Weber, 2022. "Marriage Market Counterfactuals Using Matching Models," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(353), pages 29-43, January.
    14. Carlo V. FIORIO & Stefano VERZILLO, 2018. "Looking in Your Partner’s Pocket Before Saying “Yes!" Income Assortative Mating and Inequality," Departmental Working Papers 2018-02, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    15. Jurajda, Å tÄ›pán & BiÄ Ã¡ková, Alena, 2016. "Field-of-Study Homogamy," CEPR Discussion Papers 11177, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Nicolas Frémeaux & Arnaud Lefranc, 2020. "Assortative Mating and Earnings Inequality in France," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(4), pages 757-783, December.
    17. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/13gl57r1jn8ns9de5346ma76lr is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Hryshko, Dmytro & Juhn, Chinhui & McCue, Kristin, 2017. "Trends in earnings inequality and earnings instability among U.S. couples: How important is assortative matching?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 168-182.
    19. Nybom, Martin & Plug, Erik & van der Klaauw, Bas & Ziegler, Lennart, 2022. "Skills, Parental Sorting, and Child Inequality," IZA Discussion Papers 15824, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Nico Pestel, 2017. "Marital Sorting, Inequality and the Role of Female Labour Supply: Evidence from East and West Germany," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 84(333), pages 104-127, January.
    21. Guiso, Luigi & Pistaferri, Luigi & Fagereng, Andreas, 2022. "Assortative Mating and Wealth Inequality," CEPR Discussion Papers 17148, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-46939-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.