IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v47y2023i4s0308596123000538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The state is watching you—A cross-national comparison of data retention in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Birrer, Alena
  • He, Danya
  • Just, Natascha

Abstract

While the rise of Internet platforms and their data-based business models have shifted public and scholarly attention towards corporate dataveillance, governments across Europe are similarly and continuously expanding their surveillance practices. This article focuses on bulk data retention as a prime example of modern state surveillance. In contrast to traditional forms of state surveillance, this is characterized by a shift from targeted interceptions of content to the general mass monitoring of communications metadata, takes place without prior suspicion, and outsources critical activities to the private sector. The article provides a comprehensive and up-to-date comparison of data-retention legislations and attendant discussions in Europe with a specific focus on the risks of modern state surveillance. The results indicate that both national bulk data-retention legislation and other forms of data retention such as subscriber and IP–address retention, targeted data retention, and expedited data retention fail to mitigate these risks. This highlights the need to develop precise criteria for the necessity and proportionality of data retention and effective safeguards regarding data security and protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Birrer, Alena & He, Danya & Just, Natascha, 2023. "The state is watching you—A cross-national comparison of data retention in Europe," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:47:y:2023:i:4:s0308596123000538
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596123000538
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Büllingen, Franz & Gillet, Aurélia & Gries, Christin-Isabel & Hillebrand, Annette & Stamm, Peter, 2004. "Stand und Perspektiven der Vorratsdatenspeicherung im internationalen Vergleich," WIK Discussion Papers 261, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    2. Colin Scott, 2004. "Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the Post-Regulatory State," Chapters, in: Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur (ed.), The Politics of Regulation, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Ishmael Mugari & Emeka E. Obioha, 2021. "Predictive Policing and Crime Control in The United States of America and Europe: Trends in a Decade of Research and the Future of Predictive Policing," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Whitley, Edgar A. & Hosein, Ian, 2005. "Policy discourse and data retention: The technology politics of surveillance in the United Kingdom," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 857-874, December.
    5. Paul Bernal, 2016. "Data gathering, surveillance and human rights: recasting the debate," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 243-264, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Birrer, Alena & He, Danya & Just, Natascha, 2023. "The State of State Surveillance in Europe - Findings from a Cross-National Study on Data Retention in 25 Countries," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277946, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Maciej Czaplewski, 2015. "Oddziaływanie regulacyjne Unii Europejskiej na rynek usług telekomunikacyjnych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5, pages 65-87.
    3. Nik Thompson & Tanya McGill & Anna Bunn & Rukshan Alexander, 2020. "Cultural factors and the role of privacy concerns in acceptance of government surveillance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(9), pages 1129-1142, September.
    4. Heldt, Amélie, 2019. "Reading between the lines and the numbers: an analysis of the first NetzDG reports," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18.
    5. Carvalho, Bruno & Rondon, Rodrigo & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2020. "Better utility regulation through RIA? Merits and implications based on the Brazilian case," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Heikki Marjosola, 2021. "The problem of regulatory arbitrage: A transaction cost economics perspective," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 388-407, April.
    7. Niamh Hardiman & Colin Scott, 2011. "Ordering Things: The Irish State Administration Database," Working Papers 201127, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    8. Maciej Czaplewski, 2018. "Tworzenie jednolitego rynku usług telekomunikacyjnych w Unii Europejskiej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 159-181.
    9. Hanafizadeh, Payam & Khosravi, Bayan & Badie, Kambiz, 2019. "Global discourse on ICT and the shaping of ICT policy in developing countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 324-338.
    10. Miomir Jakšić, 2016. "Role of Regulatory Bodies in the Banking and Energy Sectors," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 5(1), pages 5-23.
    11. Reinhard Steurer, 2013. "Disentangling governance: a synoptic view of regulation by government, business and civil society," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(4), pages 387-410, December.
    12. Zaheera Jinnah, 2017. "In the Shadow of a State: Self-Settlement Strategies and Informal Governance Amongst Somalis in Johannesburg," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 881-895, August.
    13. Ronan Bolton & Timothy J Foxon, 2013. "Urban Infrastructure Dynamics: Market Regulation and the Shaping of District Energy in UK Cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(9), pages 2194-2211, September.
    14. Hunter, Benjamin M. & Murray, Susan F. & Marathe, Shweta & Chakravarthi, Indira, 2022. "Decentred regulation: The case of private healthcare in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Peter Grabosky, 2013. "Beyond Responsive Regulation: The expanding role of non‐state actors in the regulatory process," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 114-123, March.
    16. Mattia Guidi, 2011. "Does Independence Affect Regulatory Performance? The case of national competition authorities in the European Union," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 64, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    17. Heims, Eva M. & Lodge, Martin, 2018. "Customer engagement in UK water regulation: towards a collaborative regulatory state?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87258, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Mia Mahmudur Rahim, 2017. "Improving Social Responsibility in RMG Industries Through a New Governance Approach in Laws," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 807-826, July.
    19. V. Balogh & K. Cseres, 2013. "Institutional Design in Hungary: A Case Study of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 343-365, September.
    20. Vlad Tarko, 2017. "Neoliberalism and Regulatory Capitalism: Understanding the "Freer Markets More Rules" Puzzle," Working Paper Series 2017-02, Dickinson College, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:47:y:2023:i:4:s0308596123000538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.