IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i6p234-d578252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Policing and Crime Control in The United States of America and Europe: Trends in a Decade of Research and the Future of Predictive Policing

Author

Listed:
  • Ishmael Mugari

    (Department of Social Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5099, South Africa)

  • Emeka E. Obioha

    (Department of Social Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5099, South Africa)

Abstract

There has been a significant focus on predictive policing systems, as law enforcement agents embrace modern technology to forecast criminal activity. Most developed nations have implemented predictive policing, albeit with mixed reactions over its effectiveness. Whilst at its inception, predictive policing involved simple heuristics and algorithms, it has increased in sophistication in the ever-changing technological environment. This paper, which is based on a literature survey, examines predictive policing over the last decade (2010 to 2020). The paper examines how various nations have implemented predictive policing and also documents the impediments to predictive policing. The paper reveals that despite the adoption of predictive software applications such as PredPol, Risk Terrain Modelling, HunchLab, PreMap, PRECOBS, Crime Anticipation System, and Azevea, there are several impediments that have militated against the effectiveness of predictive policing, and these include low predictive accuracy, limited scope of crimes that can be predicted, high cost of predictive policing software, flawed data input, and the biased nature of some predictive software applications. Despite these challenges, the paper reveals that there is consensus by the majority of the researchers on the importance of predictive algorithms on the policing landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishmael Mugari & Emeka E. Obioha, 2021. "Predictive Policing and Crime Control in The United States of America and Europe: Trends in a Decade of Research and the Future of Predictive Policing," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:234-:d:578252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/6/234/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/6/234/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aaron Shapiro, 2017. "Reform predictive policing," Nature, Nature, vol. 541(7638), pages 458-460, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Birrer, Alena & He, Danya & Just, Natascha, 2023. "The state is watching you—A cross-national comparison of data retention in Europe," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henrik Skaug Sætra, 2021. "AI in Context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the Unsustainability of the Sociotechnical System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Khaoula Naili, 2023. "Critical AI Challenges in Legal Practice : An application to French Administrative Decisions," Working Papers hal-04316581, HAL.
    3. Sukanya Samanta & Goutam Sen & Soumya Kanti Ghosh, 2022. "A literature review on police patrolling problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 1063-1106, September.
    4. Gian Maria Campedelli, 2021. "Where are we? Using Scopus to map the literature at the intersection between artificial intelligence and research on crime," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 503-530, November.
    5. Brandt, Tobias & Wagner, Sebastian & Neumann, Dirk, 2021. "Prescriptive analytics in public-sector decision-making: A framework and insights from charging infrastructure planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 379-393.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:234-:d:578252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.