IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/gosnar/y2015i5p65-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oddziaływanie regulacyjne Unii Europejskiej na rynek usług telekomunikacyjnych

Author

Listed:
  • Maciej Czaplewski

Abstract

Celem artykułu jest dokonanie oceny wyników dotychczasowej unijnej polityki regulacyjnej, prowadzonej w obszarze rynku usług telekomunikacyjnych (RUT), ukierunkowanej na stworzenie rynku konkurencyjnego. Nawiązując do przyjętego celu, skoncentrowano rozważania na udzieleniu odpowiedzi na następujące pytania badawcze: 1) czy podjęty przez UE model otwierania RUT na konkurencję okazał się skuteczny? 2) czy można już mówić o zakończeniu zaplanowanego zadania stworzenia w UE konkurencyjnego RUT? Przy pisaniu artykułu wykorzystano metodę krytycznej analizy literatury, zastosowaną do przedstawienia stanu wiedzy na temat istoty regulacji oraz powodów regulowania RUT, metodę przyczynowo-skutkową służącą do wykazania związków między konkretnymi rozwiązaniami regulacyjnymi i generowanymi przez nie efektami ekonomicznymi i społecznymi oraz metodę syntezy, pozwalającą na dokonanie kompleksowej oceny unijnej polityki regulacyjnej odnoszącej się do RUT, jak i wskazanie głównych, współczesnych dylematów tej polityki. W wyniku przeprowadzonych badań stwierdzono, iż prowadzone w UE liberalizowanie RUT doprowadziło do usunięcia monopolu telekomunikacyjnego i starych struktur regulacyjnych, oraz stworzenia i umocnienia konkurencji w obszarze świadczenia usług telekomunikacyjnych dla klientów końcowych. Mniej korzystnie przedstawiają się efekty budowania konkurencji w obszarze hurtowego dostępu do sieci (dla nowych operatorów telekomunikacyjnych). Uzyskane wyniki pozwalają na wyprowadzenie następujących wniosków: a) zastosowany przez UE model otwierania RUT na konkurencję okazał się - jak dotychczas - częściowo skuteczny, b) w istniejącej sytuacji nie można mówić o zakończeniu zaplanowanego zadania stworzenia w UE konkurencyjnego RUT, c) ważnym zadaniem prowadzonej przez UE polityki regulacyjnej w obszarze RUT powinno być wzmocnienie konkurencji w obszarze hurtowego dostępu do sieci telekomunikacyjnej.

Suggested Citation

  • Maciej Czaplewski, 2015. "Oddziaływanie regulacyjne Unii Europejskiej na rynek usług telekomunikacyjnych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5, pages 65-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2015:i:5:p:65-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.journalssystem.com/gna/pdf-100825-33114
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baldwin, Robert & Cave, Martin & Lodge, Martin, 2011. "Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199576098.
    2. Baumol, William J, 1982. "Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(1), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Hartenberger, Ute, 2007. "Auf dem Weg zum transnationalen Regulierungsregime? Eine Analyse am Beispiel der Regulierung des Telekommunikationsmarktes," TranState Working Papers 52, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    4. George J. Stigler, 1971. "The Theory of Economic Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
    5. Moe, Terry M., 1985. "Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the NLRB," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(4), pages 1094-1116, December.
    6. Colin Scott, 2004. "Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the Post-Regulatory State," Chapters, in: Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur (ed.), The Politics of Regulation, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Gary S. Becker, 1983. "A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(3), pages 371-400.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Jaag & Urs Trinkner, 2011. "A General Framework for Regulation and Liberalization in Network Industries," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Ando, Amy Whritenour, 2001. "Economies of Scope in Endangered-Species Protection: Evidence from Interest-Group Behavior," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 312-332, May.
    3. Lenka Gregorová & Milan Žák, 2008. "Byrokratická bariéra kvality regulace [Bureaucratic constraint of the quality of regulation]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(2), pages 196-228.
    4. Michael Crew & Charles Rowley, 1988. "Toward a public choice theory of monopoly regulation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 49-67, April.
    5. Felix Oberholzer-Gee & Dennis A. Yao, 2018. "Integrated Strategy: Residual Market and Exchange Imperfections as the Foundation of Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 463-480, June.
    6. Rodrigo M. S. Moita & Claudio Paiva, 2013. "Political Price Cycles in Regulated Industries: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 94-121, February.
    7. Hahn Robert, 2010. "Designing Smarter Regulation with Improved Benefit-Cost Analysis," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, July.
    8. McShane, Michael K. & Cox, Larry A. & Butler, Richard J., 2010. "Regulatory competition and forbearance: Evidence from the life insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 522-532, March.
    9. Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "How do electoral competition and special interests shape the stringency of renewable energy standards?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 14(1), pages 23-34, January.
    10. Grant H. Lewis, 2017. "Effects of federal socioeconomic contracting preferences," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 763-783, December.
    11. Deniz Igan & Prachi Mishra & Thierry Tressel, 2012. "A Fistful of Dollars: Lobbying and the Financial Crisis," NBER Macroeconomics Annual, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(1), pages 195-230.
    12. Robert Gmeiner, 2019. "Regulatory capture in the US petroleum refining industry," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(4), pages 459-498, December.
    13. Beck, Thorsten & Demirguc-Kunt, Asli & Levine, Ross, 2006. "Bank supervision and corruption in lending," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2131-2163, November.
    14. Roberts, Donna & Orden, David, 1995. "Determinants of Technical Barriers to Trade: The Case of US Phytosanitary Restrictions on Mexican Avocados, 1972-1995," 1995: Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade Conference, December 1995, Tucson, Arizona 50709, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    15. Said-Nour Samake, 2022. "Prudential Regulation and Bank Efficiency : Evidence from WAEMU Zone," Working Papers hal-03540209, HAL.
    16. Ando, Amy, 1998. "Delay on the Path to the Endangered Species List: Do Costs and Benefits Matter," RFF Working Paper Series dp-97-43-rev, Resources for the Future.
    17. Parker, David, 2001. "Economic Regulation: A Preliminary Literature Review and Summary of Research Questions Arising," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30616, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    18. William C. Mitchell, 1990. "Interest Groups: Economic Perspectives and Contributions," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 2(1), pages 85-108, January.
    19. Yogesh Uppal, 2011. "Does legislative turnover adversely affect state expenditure policy? Evidence from Indian state elections," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 189-207, April.
    20. Çetin, Tamer & Yasin Eryigit, Kadir, 2013. "The economic effects of government regulation: Evidence from the New York taxicab market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 169-177.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regulacja; liberalizacja i deregulacja; rynek usług telekomunikacyjnych; polityka UE w obszarze RUT;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L43 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Legal Monopolies and Regulation or Deregulation
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L96 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Telecommunications

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2015:i:5:p:65-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grzegorz Konat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.