IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v72y2023ics0160791x22003074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the acceptance of emotional artificial intelligence in Japanese healthcare system: A cross-sectional survey of clinic visitors’ attitude

Author

Listed:
  • Ho, Manh-Tung
  • Le, Ngoc-Thang B.
  • Mantello, Peter
  • Ho, Manh-Toan
  • Ghotbi, Nader

Abstract

Despite having one of the most advanced healthcare systems in the world, Japan is expected to experience a shortage of nearly half a million healthcare workers by 2025 due to its rapidly aging population. In response, government authorities plan to implement a wide range of AI-driven healthcare solutions. These include care robots that assist the physically handicapped or elderly, chatbots that provide anonymous online mental health consultation, and diagnostic software utilizing machine learning. Yet one of the most popular smart technologies to augment the nation's already overstrained and undermanned healthcare system is a little known but emerging emotional AI technologies, i.e., deep learning systems trained to read, classify, and respond to human emotions. These technologies are being sold on a commercial level not only to the public but also to rehabilitation centers, local hospitals, and senior citizen residences. Although the augmentation of healthcare services to intelligent machines may seem like a logical step in a country well-known for its long-standing affection toward robots, Japanese society is also known for its adherence to established social relations and traditional institutional practices, especially, in the realm of medical care. In order to gauge Japanese acceptance of emotion-sensing technology, we analyze a dataset of 245 visitors to clinics and hospitals in a typical suburban area in Japan using multiple linear regression. The results show that in general, senior and male patients perceive the emotional AI technology more negatively. For behavioral variables, patients' level of familiarity has positive correlations with attitudes toward emotional AI-based applications in private setting (βFamiliarity_AttitudePri=0.346, p<0.001) and public setting (βFamiliarity_PublicAttitude=0.297, p<0.001); while concern for losing control to AI has negative correlations with the attitudes' variables: private setting (βLosingControl_AttitudePri=−0.262,p=0.002) and public setting (β LosingControl_AttitudePub=-0.188, p=0.044). Interestingly, concerns over violation of privacy and discrimination are non-significant correlates, which contradict the emerging literature on this subject. We further contextualize the findings with insights afforded by an understanding of Japanese culture as well as the relevant literature on care robots in Japan. Finally, policy and education implications to promote emotional AI acceptance to the general and senior members of the society are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho, Manh-Tung & Le, Ngoc-Thang B. & Mantello, Peter & Ho, Manh-Toan & Ghotbi, Nader, 2023. "Understanding the acceptance of emotional artificial intelligence in Japanese healthcare system: A cross-sectional survey of clinic visitors’ attitude," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:72:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x22003074
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22003074
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Urueña & Álvaro E. Arenas & Antonio Hidalgo, 2018. "Understanding workers’ adoption of productivity mobile applications: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 967-981, January.
    2. Manh-Tung Ho & Peter Mantello & Hong-Kong T. Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2021. "Affective computing scholarship and the rise of China: a view from 25 years of bibliometric data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Manh-Tung Ho & Peter Mantello & Hong-Kong T. Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2021. "Correction: Affective computing scholarship and the rise of China: a view from 25 years of bibliometric data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-2, December.
    4. Shuhaiber, Ahmed & Mashal, Ibrahim, 2019. "Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong & Ho, Manh-Toan, 2019. "CRAN R Package ‘bayesvl: Visually Learning the Graphical Structure of Bayesian Networks and Performing MCMC with 'Stan''," OSF Preprints 94fh6, Center for Open Science.
    6. Yuho Shimizu & Aimi Ishizuna & Shin Osaki & Takaaki Hashimoto & Mitsuharu Tai & Tetsushi Tanibe & Kaori Karasawa, 2022. "The Social Acceptance of Smart Health Services in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Ho, Manh-Tung & Mantello, Peter & Ghotbi, Nader & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Nguyen, Hong-Kong T. & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2022. "Rethinking technological acceptance in the age of emotional AI: Surveying Gen Z (Zoomer) attitudes toward non-conscious data collection," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Oderkirk, Jillian & Ronchi, Elettra & Klazinga, Niek, 2013. "International comparisons of health system performance among OECD countries: Opportunities and data privacy protection challenges," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 9-18.
    9. Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2018. "The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 5-5, January.
    10. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2018. "Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 239-257, March.
    11. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Quang-Khiem Bui & Viet-Phuong La & Thu-Trang Vuong & Viet-Ha T. Nguyen & Manh-Toan Ho & Hong-Kong T. Nguyen & Manh-Tung Ho, 2018. "Cultural additivity: behavioural insights from the interaction of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism in folktales," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2016. "Global Mindset as the Integration of Emerging Socio-Cultural Values Through Mindsponge Processes," OSF Preprints c3jza, Center for Open Science.
    14. Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2022. "A New Theory of Serendipity: Nature, Emergence and Mechanism," OSF Preprints t8ahv, Center for Open Science.
    15. Yujin Woo, 2022. "Homogenous Japan? An Empirical Examination on Public Perceptions of Citizenship [‘Measuring Dimensions of National Identity across Countries: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections’]," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 209-228.
    16. Kamal, Syeda Ayesha & Shafiq, Muhammad & Kakria, Priyanka, 2020. "Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roppelt, Julia Stefanie & Kanbach, Dominik K. & Kraus, Sascha, 2024. "Artificial intelligence in healthcare institutions: A systematic literature review on influencing factors," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Williams, Robin & Anderson, Stuart & Cresswell, Kathrin & Kannelønning, Mari Serine & Mozaffar, Hajar & Yang, Xiao, 2024. "Domesticating AI in medical diagnosis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Miozza, Mario & Brunetta, Federica & Appio, Francesco Paolo, 2024. "Digital transformation of the Pharmaceutical Industry: A future research agenda for management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Mishra, Nidhi & Bharti, Teena & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Pfajfar, Gregor, 2024. "Public and scholarly interest in social robots: An investigation through Google Trends, bibliometric analysis, and systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Zahlan, Ahmed & Ranjan, Ravi Prakash & Hayes, David, 2023. "Artificial intelligence innovation in healthcare: Literature review, exploratory analysis, and future research," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Tala Talaei Khoei & Aditi Singh, 2024. "A survey of Emotional Artificial Intelligence and crimes: detection, prediction, challenges and future direction," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 2359-2402, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ho, Manh-Tung & Mantello, Peter & Ghotbi, Nader & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Nguyen, Hong-Kong T. & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2022. "Rethinking technological acceptance in the age of emotional AI: Surveying Gen Z (Zoomer) attitudes toward non-conscious data collection," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Peter Mantello & Manh-Tung Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2023. "Machines that feel: behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2023. "Investigating urban residents' involvement in biodiversity conservation in protected areas: Empirical evidence from Vietnam," Thesis Commons z2hjv, Center for Open Science.
    4. Le Ngoc Anh, Hoang & Ho, Manh-Toan, 2019. "Quan hệ hợp tác Việt Nam – Hoa Kỳ trong lĩnh vực giáo dục đại học từ năm 1992 đến năm 2015," Thesis Commons 4gd5x, Center for Open Science.
    5. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Tam-Tri Le & Viet-Phuong La & Huyen Thanh Thanh Nguyen & Manh-Toan Ho & Quy Khuc & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2022. "Covid-19 vaccines production and societal immunization under the serendipity-mindsponge-3D knowledge management theory and conceptual framework," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Thanh-Hang Pham & Trung Tran & Thu-Trang Vuong & Nguyen Manh Cuong & Nguyen Phuc Khanh Linh & Viet-Phuong La & Manh Toan Ho, 2020. "STEM education and outcomes in Vietnam: Views from the social gap and gender issues," Working Papers CEB 20-003, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Behn, Oliver & Leyer, Michael & Iren, Deniz, 2024. "Employees’ acceptance of AI-based emotion analytics from speech on a group level in virtual meetings," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong & Nguyen, Thanh-Huyen T. & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Thu-Trang & Vuong, Ha-My & Ho, Manh-Toan, 2021. "Impacts of parents and reading promotion on creating a reading culture: Evidence from a developing context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Manh-Tung Ho & Peter Mantello & Hong-Kong T. Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2021. "Affective computing scholarship and the rise of China: a view from 25 years of bibliometric data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Le, Tam-Tri & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2022. "Solo publications and the thoughts behind them," OSF Preprints mz4jq, Center for Open Science.
    11. Le, Tam-Tri & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2022. "A journey of SM3D: looking back at notable studies," OSF Preprints a8pju, Center for Open Science.
    12. Mindsponge, AISDL, 2022. "The mindsponge & BMF analytics project," OSF Preprints 3wvf5, Center for Open Science.
    13. Team, AISDL, 2023. "Applications and developments of BMF analytics/MT over time," OSF Preprints gr3jt, Center for Open Science.
    14. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Ho, Manh-Toan, 2021. "On the value of the mindsponge*bayesvl approach to researching humanities and social sciences phenomena," OSF Preprints yw673, Center for Open Science.
    15. Lim, Joon Soo & Zhang, Jun, 2022. "Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    16. Ho, Manh-Toan, 2021. "Mindsponge: Some Remarks for Future Research Directions," OSF Preprints ce2y7, Center for Open Science.
    17. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong & Ho, Manh-Toan & Vuong, Thu-Trang & Hoang, Hanh Phuong, 2019. "What have Vietnamese scholars learned from researching entrepreneurship?: A systematic review," OSF Preprints uhwmn, Center for Open Science.
    18. Ho, Tung Manh, 2021. "Mapping out the emotional AI ecology in Japan: Preliminary insights from semi-structured interviews of top Japanese AI companies," OSF Preprints a2cfv, Center for Open Science.
    19. Carlos Lamela-Orcasitas & Jesús García-Madariaga, 2023. "How to really quantify the economic value of customer information in corporate databases," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Trung Tran & Manh-Toan Ho & Thanh-Hang Pham & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Khanh-Linh P. Nguyen & Thu-Trang Vuong & Thanh-Huyen T. Nguyen & Thanh-Dung Nguyen & Thi-Linh Nguyen & Quy Khuc & Viet-Phuong La & Qua, 2020. "How Digital Natives Learn and Thrive in the Digital Age: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:72:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x22003074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.