IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v67y2021ics0160791x21002815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Passengers’ perceptions on the use of biometrics at airports: A statistical model of the extended theory of planned behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Kasim, Kabir O.
  • Winter, Scott R.
  • Liu, Dahai
  • Keebler, Joseph R.
  • Spence, Tyler B.

Abstract

This study reviewed the factors which influence passengers' behavioral intentions on using biometrics at airports. The theory of planned behavior (TPB) served as the theoretical foundation and included perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. The study also examined the effect of passengers' privacy concerns on their behavioral intentions and assessed the moderating influence of privacy on the influencing factors. Following a quantitative method, 689 participants responded to an online survey while data analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM). Attitudes and subjective norms were found to significantly influence passengers’ behavioral intentions to use biometrics. However, perceived behavioral control (PBC), as well as perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use did not have a significant effect on intentions. Four of the six hypotheses involving privacy concerns were supported. Of the five hypotheses proposed to assess the moderating role of privacy, three were supported. However, since the effect sizes were small, the final model did not include the moderation effects. The final model was found to account for 80.2% of the variance in intentions and 35.2% of the variance in privacy concerns. The findings provide useful theoretical contributions and practical applications to support the adoption of biometric systems at airports, while recommendations for further study are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Kasim, Kabir O. & Winter, Scott R. & Liu, Dahai & Keebler, Joseph R. & Spence, Tyler B., 2021. "Passengers’ perceptions on the use of biometrics at airports: A statistical model of the extended theory of planned behavior," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:67:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21002815
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21002815
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buaphiban, Thapanat & Truong, Dothang, 2017. "Evaluation of passengers' buying behaviors toward low cost carriers in Southeast Asia," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 124-133.
    2. Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2020. "Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Peng Jing & Hao Huang & Bin Ran & Fengping Zhan & Yuji Shi, 2019. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Mode Choice Intention of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    6. Borhan, Muhamad Nazri & Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi & Miskeen, Manssour A.Abdulasalm & Rahmat, Riza Atiq O.K. & Alhodairi, Ahmed Mohamed, 2017. "Predicting car drivers’ intention to use low cost airlines for intercity travel in Libya," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 88-98.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:5:y:2010:i:5:p:411-419 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Darrell Carpenter & Alexander McLeod & Chelsea Hicks & Michele Maasberg, 0. "Privacy and biometrics: An empirical examination of employee concerns," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    9. Mohd Suki, Norazah & Mohd Suki, Norbayah, 2017. "Flight ticket booking app on mobile devices: Examining the determinants of individual intention to use," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 146-154.
    10. Caroline Lancelot Miltgen & Ales Popovic & Tiago Oliveira, 2013. "Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the “Big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context," Post-Print hal-01116141, HAL.
    11. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    12. Pan, Jing Yu & Truong, Dothang, 2018. "Passengers’ intentions to use low-cost carriers: An extended theory of planned behavior model," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 38-48.
    13. Tao Zhou, 2015. "Understanding user adoption of location-based services from a dual perspective of enablers and inhibitors," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 413-422, April.
    14. Li Hua & Shanyong Wang, 2019. "Antecedents of Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Energy-Efficient Appliances: An Empirical Study Based on the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Ingrid Moons & Patrick De Pelsmacker, 2015. "An Extended Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour to Predict the Usage Intention of the Electric Car: A Multi-Group Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-34, May.
    16. Cheong Kim & Kun Chang Lee & Francis Joseph Costello, 2020. "The Intention of Passengers towards Repeat Use of Biometric Security for Sustainable Airport Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Sakshi, & Tandon, Urvashi & Ertz, Myriam & Bansal, Harbhajan, 2020. "Social vacation: Proposition of a model to understand tourists’ usage of social media for travel planning," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    18. Lu, Jin-Long & Chou, Hung-Yen & Ling, Pei-Chuan, 2009. "Investigating passengers' intentions to use technology-based self check-in services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 345-356, March.
    19. Lin, Shu Hsu & Lee, Hsing-Chen & Chang, Ching-Ter & James Fu, Changjui, 2020. "Behavioral intention towards mobile learning in Taiwan, China, Indonesia, and Vietnam," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Rob Eisinga & Manfred Grotenhuis & Ben Pelzer, 2013. "The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(4), pages 637-642, August.
    21. McCole, Patrick & Ramsey, Elaine & Williams, John, 2010. "Trust considerations on attitudes towards online purchasing: The moderating effect of privacy and security concerns," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1018-1024, September.
    22. Darrell Carpenter & Alexander McLeod & Chelsea Hicks & Michele Maasberg, 2018. "Privacy and biometrics: An empirical examination of employee concerns," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 91-110, February.
    23. Halder, Pradipta & Pietarinen, Janne & Havu-Nuutinen, Sari & Pöllänen, Sinikka & Pelkonen, Paavo, 2016. "The Theory of Planned Behavior model and students' intentions to use bioenergy: A cross-cultural perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 627-635.
    24. Berinsky, Adam J. & Huber, Gregory A. & Lenz, Gabriel S., 2012. "Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 351-368, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin Zhou & Lihua Li & Ruoran Lei, 2023. "Framework and Perception Survey of Tourism Accessibility Concerning Regional Airports Based on Nexus Thinking: An Empirical Study in Ganzi Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Mwesiumo, Deodat & Halpern, Nigel & Bråthen, Svein & Budd, Thomas & Suau-Sanchez, Pere, 2023. "Perceived benefits as a driver and necessary condition for the willingness of air passengers to provide personal data for non-mandatory digital services at airports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kum Fai Yuen & Do Thi Khanh Huyen & Xueqin Wang & Guanqiu Qi, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Shared Autonomous Vehicles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Jun Hwan Kim & Hyun Cheol Lee, 2019. "Understanding the Repurchase Intention of Premium Economy Passengers Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    4. Irawan, Muhammad Zudhy & Simanjuntak, Nurvita I.M. & Bastarianto, Faza Fawzan & Dwitasari, Reslyana & Herawati,, 2020. "Predicting the impact of Trans Java Toll Roads on demand for intercity air travel in Indonesia," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Borhan, Muhamad Nazri & Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi & Miskeen, Manssour A. Abdulasalm, 2019. "Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external inf," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-384.
    6. Kum Fai Yuen & Grace Chua & Xueqin Wang & Fei Ma & Kevin X. Li, 2020. "Understanding Public Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Su, Diep Ngoc & Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Vo, Nguyen S. & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "Factors influencing intention to use on-demand shared ride-hailing services in Vietnam: risk, cost or sustainability?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Sebastián Molinillo & Elena Higueras-Castillo, 2022. "Do biometric payment systems work during the COVID-19 pandemic? Insights from the Spanish users' viewpoint," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Jing, Peng & Wang, Baihui & Cai, Yunhao & Wang, Bichen & Huang, Jiahui & Yang, Chenglu & Jiang, Chengxi, 2023. "What is the public really concerned about the AV crash? Insights from a combined analysis of social media and questionnaire survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Truong, Dothang & Pan, Jing Yu & Buaphiban, Thapanat, 2020. "Low cost carriers in Southeast Asia: How does ticket price change the way passengers make their airline selection?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Mohapatra, Malaya Ranjan & Moirangthem, Nirmalkumar Singh & Vishwakarma, Pankaj, 2020. "Mobile Banking Adoption Among Rural Consumers: Evidence from India," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 23(2), pages 300-315, November.
    12. Jing Yu Pan & Dothang Truong, 2021. "Low cost carriers in China: passenger segmentation, controllability, and airline selection," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1587-1612, August.
    13. Jun Hwan Kim & Woon-Kyung Song & Hyun Cheol Lee, 2023. "Exploring the Determinants of Travelers’ Intention to Use the Airport Biometric System: A Korean Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Chong Li & Yingqi Li, 2023. "Factors Influencing Public Risk Perception of Emerging Technologies: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-37, February.
    15. Im, Hyunjoo & Ha, Young, 2013. "Enablers and inhibitors of permission-based marketing: A case of mobile coupons," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 495-503.
    16. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    17. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Jeeyeon Jeong & Yaeri Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2021. "Do Consumers Care About Aesthetics and Compatibility? The Intention to Use Wearable Devices in Health Care," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    19. Samadzad, Mahdi & Nosratzadeh, Hossein & Karami, Hossein & Karami, Ali, 2023. "What are the factors affecting the adoption and use of electric scooter sharing systems from the end user's perspective?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 70-82.
    20. Roberta Riverso & Carmela Altamura & Francesco La Barbera, 2023. "Consumer Intention to Buy Electric Cars: Integrating Uncertainty in the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:67:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21002815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.