IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v49y2017icp16-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where learners' and teachers' perceptions on mobile learning meet: A case of Namibian secondary schools in the Khomas region

Author

Listed:
  • Osakwe, Jude
  • Dlodlo, Nomusa
  • Jere, Nobert

Abstract

Globally, most governments have devoted resources to information and communication technology (ICT) development. Their goal is to improve teaching and learning using innovative technology in institutions of learning. This has brought about the formulation of educational ICT policies. These policies are aimed at guiding the implementation processes in schools. Namibia adopted the National ICT policy for Education in 2005 and the National ICT Policy Implementation Plan in 2006. Based on information, since the adoption of the policy, no study has been done to evaluate the implementation process, thereby making it difficult to ascertain the readiness of teachers and learners towards the adoption of these technologies of which mobile learning technology is one of them. This study analyses the perception of teachers and learners towards the adoption of mobile learning in Namibian high schools. The research is a mixed method study, undertaking surveys and interviews with learners and teachers from three schools in the Khomas region. The study uses the UTAUT as a guiding model to analyse teacher and learner perceptions towards mobile learning. Data collected after survey were analyzed using SPSS and excel tools, and then percentage analysis was done to find the key contributors towards to adoption of mobile learning in Namibian high schools. The findings were that the majority of teachers and learners in Namibian high schools are mobile ICT literate. Most of teachers and learners own handheld mobile devices, can access the internet, download education material and applications from the internet using mobile devices, use mobile devices as calculators, access social networking sites, search for definitions of words on mobile, send emails, conduct searches for material, read assignments and post comments on blogs. Both teachers and learners were positive that mobile technology would enhance their teaching and learning capabilities, assist in improving learner grades and accomplish teaching and learning activities quickly. Although learners were positive that mobile education should be made compulsory in schools, they feel that the decision lies with policy makers on whether schools should adopt it. Both learners and teachers feel that Namibia has the resources in place to introduce mobile learning without any glitches. These resources are in the form of infrastructure and human resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Osakwe, Jude & Dlodlo, Nomusa & Jere, Nobert, 2017. "Where learners' and teachers' perceptions on mobile learning meet: A case of Namibian secondary schools in the Khomas region," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 16-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:49:y:2017:i:c:p:16-30
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X16301476
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenny C. Aker & Christopher Ksoll & Travis J. Lybbert, 2012. "Can Mobile Phones Improve Learning? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Niger," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 4(4), pages 94-120, October.
    2. Pamela Cowan & Ryan Butler, 2013. "Using Activity Theory to Problematize the Role of the Teacher During Mobile Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, December.
    3. Norbert Pachler & John Cook & Ben Bachmair, 2010. "Appropriation of Mobile Cultural Resources for Learning," International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), IGI Global, vol. 2(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Andrew Lepp & Jacob E. Barkley & Aryn C. Karpinski, 2015. "The Relationship Between Cell Phone Use and Academic Performance in a Sample of U.S. College Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sana Sadiq & Khadija Anasse & Najib Slimani, 2022. "The impact of mobile phones on high school students: connecting the research dots," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 252-270, April.
    2. Yang, Hui-Yu, 2019. "The effects of visuospatial cueing on EFL learners' science text and picture processing through mobile phones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Szymkowiak, Andrzej & Melović, Boban & Dabić, Marina & Jeganathan, Kishokanth & Kundi, Gagandeep Singh, 2021. "Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. Singh, Yashdeep & Suri, Pradeep Kumar, 2022. "An empirical analysis of mobile learning app usage experience," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Bravo-Adasme, Natalia & Cataldo, Alejandro, 2022. "Understanding techno-distress and its influence on educational communities: A two-wave study with multiple data samples," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Lin, Shu Hsu & Lee, Hsing-Chen & Chang, Ching-Ter & James Fu, Changjui, 2020. "Behavioral intention towards mobile learning in Taiwan, China, Indonesia, and Vietnam," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Baabdullah, Abdullah Mohammed, 2018. "Consumer adoption of Mobile Social Network Games (M-SNGs) in Saudi Arabia: The role of social influence, hedonic motivation and trust," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 91-102.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Songli Mei & Jingxin Chai & Shi-Bin Wang & Chee H. Ng & Gabor S. Ungvari & Yu-Tao Xiang, 2018. "Mobile Phone Dependence, Social Support and Impulsivity in Chinese University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-7, March.
    2. Cocoradă, Elena & Maican, Cătălin Ioan & Cazan, Ana-Maria & Maican, Maria Anca, 2018. "Assessing the smartphone addiction risk and its associations with personality traits among adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 345-354.
    3. Deshpande, Ashwini & Desrochers, Alain & Ksoll, Christopher & Shonchoy, Abu S., 2017. "The Impact of a Computer-based Adult Literacy Program on Literacy and Numeracy: Evidence from India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 451-473.
    4. Jörg Peters & Jörg Langbein & Gareth Roberts, 2018. "Generalization in the Tropics – Development Policy, Randomized Controlled Trials, and External Validity," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 34-64.
    5. Chathurika Sewwandi Kannangara & Rosie Elizabeth Allen & Jerome Francis Carson & Samia Zahraa Noor Khan & Gill Waugh & Kondal Reddy Kandadi, 2020. "Onwards and upwards: The development, piloting and validation of a new measure of academic tenacity- The Bolton Uni-Stride Scale (BUSS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Del Rey, Elena & Estevan, Fernanda, 2013. "Conditional cash transfers and education quality in the presence of credit constraints," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 76-84.
    7. Naveed Hayat & Muhammad Imran & Shabbir Ahmad & Adnan Ali Shahzad & Jamshaid ur Rehman, 2022. "The Effect of Mobile Phone Use on the Students’ Budget, Social Behavior and Academic Performance: A Case Study of Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(3), pages 122-134, September.
    8. Anuradha Mathrani & Rahila Umer & Tarushikha Sarvesh & Janak Adhikari, 2023. "Rural–Urban, Gender, and Digital Divides during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Multi-Layered Study," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Fan, Hong & Song, Xiaofei, 2020. "The advantages of combining mobile technology and audience response systems," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    10. Hashibul Hassan & Asad Islam & Abu Siddique & Liang Choon Wang, 2024. "Telementoring and Homeschooling During School Closures: a Randomised Experiment in Rural Bangladesh," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(662), pages 2418-2438.
    11. Jean-Philippe Berrou & François Combarnous & Thomas Eekhout, 2017. "Les TIC : une réponse au défi du développement des micro et petites entreprises informelles en Afrique sub-saharienne ?," Working Papers hal-02148324, HAL.
    12. Stijn Baert & Sunčica Vujić & Simon Amez & Matteo Claeskens & Thomas Daman & Arno Maeckelberghe & Eddy Omey & Lieven De Marez, 2020. "Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: Correlation or Causal Relationship?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 22-46, February.
    13. repec:zbw:itse22:265632 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Simon Amez & Stijn Baert, 2019. "Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: a Literature Review," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 19/982, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    15. Young, Alwyn, 2024. "Asymptotically robust permutation-based randomization confidence intervals for parametric OLS regression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120933, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Nicoletta Giulivi & Aurélie P. Harou & Shriniwas Gautam & Davíd Guereña, 2023. "Getting the message out: Information and communication technologies and agricultural extension," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(3), pages 1011-1045, May.
    17. Travis J. Lybbert & Bruce Wydick, 2017. "Hope as Aspirations, Agency, and Pathways: Poverty Dynamics and Microfinance in Oaxaca, Mexico," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Poverty Traps, pages 153-177, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Noam Angrist & Peter Bergman & Moitshepi Matsheng, 2022. "Experimental evidence on learning using low-tech when school is out," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 941-950, July.
    19. Christopher Ksoll, Janny Aker, Danielle Miller, Karla C. Perez-Mendoza, and Susan L. Smalley, 2014. "Learning without Teachers? A Randomized Experiment of a Mobile Phone-Based Adult Education Program in Los Angeles - Working Paper 368," Working Papers 368, Center for Global Development.
    20. Chathurika Kannangara & Rosie Allen & Kevin D Hochard & Jerome Carson, 2022. "An international validation of the Bolton Unistride Scale (BUSS) of tenacity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, March.
    21. Gonzalez, Robert & Maffioli, Elisa M., 2024. "Is the phone mightier than the virus? Cellphone access and epidemic containment efforts," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:49:y:2017:i:c:p:16-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.