IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v174y2022ics0040162521006818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A complex-systems perspective on the role of universities in social innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Tjörnbo, Ola
  • McGowan, Katharine

Abstract

A lack of agreement on what is included in social innovation processes and outcomes has not stopped universities in exploring their possible role(s) in the phenomena; yet these efforts have largely replicated existing approaches to technological and business innovation, which is ill-aligned with much current scholarship in social innovation. We argue that universities’ social innovation support should emerge from the lessons of social innovation scholarship itself: specifically, we assert based on cross-case analysis that universities have important roles in: providing the space for initial discovery or descriptions of new phenomena and ways of doing; destabilizing the dominant system arrangements; supporting niches for idea generation and development; sustaining shadow networks for emergent innovations and innovators; and leveraging cross-scale networks to facilitate social innovation growth. While these examples are pulled from history, they provide a potential set of road maps for social innovation programming at universities, some of which is consistent with current work but others that will require serious re-examination and redevelopment of universities’ roles in the broader social innovation ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Tjörnbo, Ola & McGowan, Katharine, 2022. "A complex-systems perspective on the role of universities in social innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521006818
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521006818
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele-Lee Moore & Frances R. Westley & Ola Tjornbo & Carin Holroyd, 2012. "The Loop, the Lens, and the Lesson: Using Resilience Theory to Examine Public Policy and Social Innovation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Alex Nicholls & Alex Murdock (ed.), Social Innovation, chapter 3, pages 89-113, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan, 2007. "Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 399-417, April.
    3. Avelino, Flor & Wittmayer, Julia M. & Pel, Bonno & Weaver, Paul & Dumitru, Adina & Haxeltine, Alex & Kemp, René & Jørgensen, Michael S. & Bauler, Tom & Ruijsink, Saskia & O'Riordan, Tim, 2019. "Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 195-206.
    4. Rajagopal, 2014. "Organizations and Innovation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 3, pages 58-86, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Geoff Mulgan, 2012. "Social Innovation Theories: Can Theory Catch Up with Practice?," Springer Books, in: Hans-Werner Franz & Josef Hochgerner & Jürgen Howaldt (ed.), Challenge Social Innovation, edition 127, pages 19-42, Springer.
    6. Marcie J. Tyre & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1994. "Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 98-118, February.
    7. Marten Scheffer, 2010. "Foreseeing tipping points," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7314), pages 411-412, September.
    8. Edwards-Schachter, Mónica & Wallace, Matthew L., 2017. "‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 64-79.
    9. Loet Leydesdorff & Henry Etzkowitz, 1998. "The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 195-203, June.
    10. Ralph D. Stacey, 1995. "The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(6), pages 477-495.
    11. Bayuo, Blaise Booponoyeng & Chaminade, Cristina & Göransson, Bo, 2020. "Unpacking the role of universities in the emergence, development and impact of social innovations – A systematic review of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Judith Terstriep & Dieter Rehfeld & Maria Kleverbeck, 2020. "Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? – An explorative approach," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 881-905, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Urmanaviciene Audrone & Kostalova Jana & Baturina Danijel & Krzyworzeka Paweł & Budrytė Paulina & Lepik Katri-Liis, 2022. "Were Social Labs immune to COVID-19? Impacts and benefits," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(s1), pages 381-401, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Puente & María Eugenia Fabra & Cindy Mason & Cristina Puente-Rueda & Maria Ana Sáenz-Nuño & Ramiro Viñuales, 2021. "Role of the Universities as Drivers of Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    3. Arocena, Rodrigo & Sutz, Judith, 2021. "Universities and social innovation for global sustainable development as seen from the south," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Trischler, Jakob & Johnson, Mikael & Kristensson, Per, 2020. "A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 552-560.
    5. Julia Maria Wittmayer & Tessa de Geus & Bonno Pel & F. Avelino & Sabine Hielscher & Thomas Hoppe & Marie Susan Mühlemeier & Agata Stasik & Sem Oxenaar & Karoline K.S. Rogge & Vivian Visser & Esther Ma, 2020. "Beyond instrumentalism: Broadening the understanding of social innovation in socio-technical energy systems," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/312323, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Frans Sengers & Bruno Turnheim & Frans Berkhout, 2021. "Beyond experiments: Embedding outcomes in climate governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1148-1171, September.
    7. Camaren Peter, 2021. "Social Innovation for Sustainable Urban Developmental Transitions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Leveraging Economic Ecosystems and the Entrepreneurial State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Bayuo, Blaise Booponoyeng & Chaminade, Cristina & Göransson, Bo, 2020. "Unpacking the role of universities in the emergence, development and impact of social innovations – A systematic review of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    9. Bellandi, Marco & Donati, Letizia & Cataneo, Alessandra, 2021. "Social innovation governance and the role of universities: Cases of quadruple helix partnerships in Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Schäpke, Niko & Stelzer, Franziska & Bergmann, Matthias & Singer-Brodowski, Mandy & Wanner, Matthias & Caniglia, Guido & Lang, Daniel J., 2017. "Reallabore im Kontext transformativer Forschung: Ansatzpunkte zur Konzeption und Einbettung in den internationalen Forschungsstand," EconStor Preprints 168596, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    11. Marletto, Gerardo & Sillig, Cécile, 2019. "Lost in Mainstreaming? Agrifood and Urban Mobility Grassroots Innovations with Multiple Pathways and Outcomes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 88-100.
    12. Wittmayer, Julia M. & Avelino, Flor & Pel, Bonno & Campos, Inês, 2021. "Contributing to sustainable and just energy systems? The mainstreaming of renewable energy prosumerism within and across institutional logics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Lu, Xiaowei & Wang, Jiexiang, 2024. "Is innovation strategy a catalyst to solve social problems? The impact of R&D and non-R&D innovation strategies on the performance of social innovation-oriented firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Adamo, Greta & Willis, Max, 2022. "Technologically mediated practices in sustainability transitions: Environmental monitoring and the ocean data buoy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    15. Hannah Pitt & Mat Jones, 2016. "Scaling up and out as a Pathway for Food System Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Kleba, John Bernhard & Reina-Rozo, Juan David, 2021. "Fostering peace engineering and rethinking development: A Latin American view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Harald A. Mieg, 2022. "Social Innovation in Sustainable Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-4, April.
    18. Ines Omann & Moritz Kammerlander & Jill Jäger & Alexander Bisaro & J. David Tàbara, 2020. "Assessing opportunities for scaling out, up and deep of win-win solutions for a sustainable world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 753-767, June.
    19. Maria Ehrnström-Fuentes & Hanna Leipämaa-Leskinen, 2019. "Boundary Negotiations in a Self-Organized Grassroots-Led Food Network: The Case of REKO in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Turnheim, Bruno & Nykvist, Björn, 2019. "Opening up the feasibility of sustainability transitions pathways (STPs): Representations, potentials, and conditions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 775-788.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:174:y:2022:i:c:s0040162521006818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.