IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v110y2016icp78-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High/low reputation companies' dialogic communication activities and semantic networks on Facebook: A comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Hong, Yoo Jung
  • Shin, Donghee
  • Kim, Jang Hyun

Abstract

The present study aims to examine whether there is a significant difference between the level of activity and semantic networks of the Facebook pages of highly reputable and less reputable companies of the same industry. Applying the dialogic communication theory, the present study conducted a semantic network analysis. Samples used in the study include a total of five technology companies: Google, Sony, Dell, Fujitsu and Lenovo. Various elements, such as word clusters, co-occurring words and visual representation, were carried out through NodeXL, WORDij and UCINET software. The results show that high reputation score companies are not necessarily more engaged in direct interaction with its publics than low reputation score companies. In addition, high reputation score companies had positive words, whereas low reputation score companies had mixed results.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong, Yoo Jung & Shin, Donghee & Kim, Jang Hyun, 2016. "High/low reputation companies' dialogic communication activities and semantic networks on Facebook: A comparative study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 78-92.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:110:y:2016:i:c:p:78-92
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516300622
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melisa Erdilek Karabay, 2014. "Corporate Reputation: A Definitional Landscape," Springer Books, in: Samuel O Idowu & Kiymet Tunca Çaliyurt (ed.), Corporate Governance, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 229-240, Springer.
    2. Weiai Xu & I-Hsuan Chiu & Yixin Chen & Tanuka Mukherjee, 2015. "Twitter hashtags for health: applying network and content analyses to understand the health knowledge sharing in a Twitter-based community of practice," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1361-1380, July.
    3. Xanat Vargas Meza & Han Park, 2015. "Globalization of cultural products: a webometric analysis of Kpop in Spanish-speaking countries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1345-1360, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian D. Williams & Jesus N. Valero & Kyungwoo Kim, 2018. "Social media, trust, and disaster: Does trust in public and nonprofit organizations explain social media use during a disaster?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 537-550, March.
    2. Young-Joo Lee & Ji-Young Park, 2018. "Identification of future signal based on the quantitative and qualitative text mining: a case study on ethical issues in artificial intelligence," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 653-667, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rocco Agrifoglio & Paola Briganti & Concetta Metallo & Luisa Varriale, 2023. "Virtual healthcare communities of practice: An Italian experience during the Covid-19 pandemic," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(125), pages 11-28.
    2. Elena Milani & Emma Weitkamp & Peter Webb, 2020. "The Visual Vaccine Debate on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 364-375.
    3. Peng Wang & Fang-Wei Zhu & Hao-Yang Song & Jian-Hua Hou & Jin-Lan Zhang, 2018. "Visualizing the Academic Discipline of Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Devendra Potnis & Iman Tahamtan, 2021. "Hashtags for gatekeeping of information on social media," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1234-1246, October.
    5. Katharina Baum & Annika Baumann & Katharina Batzel, 2024. "Investigating Innovation Diffusion in Gender-Specific Medicine: Insights from Social Network Analysis," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(3), pages 335-355, June.
    6. Salvatore Pirri & Valentina Lorenzoni & Gianni Andreozzi & Marta Mosca & Giuseppe Turchetti, 2020. "Topic Modeling and User Network Analysis on Twitter during World Lupus Awareness Day," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Eun Sun Lee & Kyujin Jung, 2018. "Dynamics of social economy self-organized on social media: following social entrepreneur forum and social economy network on Facebook," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 635-651, March.
    8. Kim Amee & McGoun Elton G., 2022. "K-Pop and K-Car: The Underpinnings of 21st-Century Korean Cultural and Industrial Successes," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 103-134, June.
    9. Jung, Kyujin & Valero, Jesus N., 2016. "Assessing the evolutionary structure of homeless network: Social media use, keywords, and influential stakeholders," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 51-60.
    10. Kim, Jiyoung & Lee, Yeon-Ok & Park, Han Woo, 2016. "Delineating the complex use of a political podcast in South Korea by hybrid web indicators: The case of the Nakkomsu Twitter network," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 42-50.
    11. Kim Amee & McGoun Elton G., 2022. "K-Pop and K-Car: The Underpinnings of 21st-Century Korean Cultural and Industrial Successes," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 103-134, June.
    12. Srijana Acharya & Han Woo Park, 2017. "Open data in Nepal: a webometric network analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1027-1043, May.
    13. Jiwon Kang & Jina Kim & Migyeong Yang & Eunil Park & Minsam Ko & Munyoung Lee & Jinyoung Han, 2022. "Behind the scenes of K-pop fandom: unveiling K-pop fandom collaboration network," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1481-1502, June.
    14. Weiai Wayne Xu & Ji-young Park & Han Woo Park, 2017. "Longitudinal dynamics of the cultural diffusion of Kpop on YouTube," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1859-1875, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:110:y:2016:i:c:p:78-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.