IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v52y2018i2d10.1007_s11135-017-0594-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social media, trust, and disaster: Does trust in public and nonprofit organizations explain social media use during a disaster?

Author

Listed:
  • Brian D. Williams

    (Lamar University)

  • Jesus N. Valero

    (University of Utah)

  • Kyungwoo Kim

    (University of North Texas)

Abstract

This study seeks to understand public trust as a factor that compels citizens to utilize social media in the midst of a disaster. More specifically, we explore whether the source of trustworthy information explains variation in the use of social media as an avenue of communication. In order to test this relationship, we draw on previous social media and emergency management research and utilize data from a 2012 survey conducted by the American Red Cross. First, descriptive results indicate that citizens are more likely to report that friends and family are their preferred source of trustworthy information as opposed to local emergency officials and U.S. federal agencies (such as FEMA) or official non-governmental organizations. However, when only official organizations are considered, citizens are more likely to use social media during a disaster when their source of trustworthy information derives from local emergency officials. Additionally, when the public has used social media during a disaster, the need for trust may not disappear but is not as significant to the use of social media during a disaster. These results suggest that local public organizations should invest efforts in building the public’s trust to ensure that critical information is efficiently disseminated and accessed by citizens over social media when disaster strikes. In summary, as more trust in local emergency management increases, use of social media in a disaster is expected to increase. As public use of social media during a disaster increases, more of the public can be reached to increase the effectiveness of protective actions during a disaster.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian D. Williams & Jesus N. Valero & Kyungwoo Kim, 2018. "Social media, trust, and disaster: Does trust in public and nonprofit organizations explain social media use during a disaster?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 537-550, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0594-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0594-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-017-0594-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-017-0594-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyujin Jung & Kenneth Chilton & Jesus N. Valero, 2017. "Uncovering stakeholders in public–private relations on social media: a case study of the 2015 Volkswagen scandal," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1113-1131, May.
    2. Hong, Yoo Jung & Shin, Donghee & Kim, Jang Hyun, 2016. "High/low reputation companies' dialogic communication activities and semantic networks on Facebook: A comparative study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 78-92.
    3. Michael Siegrist & George Cvetkovich, 2000. "Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5), pages 713-720, October.
    4. Jung, Kyujin & Valero, Jesus N., 2016. "Assessing the evolutionary structure of homeless network: Social media use, keywords, and influential stakeholders," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 51-60.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jungwon Yeo & Claire Connolly Knox & Kyujin Jung, 2018. "Unveiling cultures in emergency response communication networks on social media: following the 2016 Louisiana floods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 519-535, March.
    2. Young-Joo Lee & Ji-Young Park, 2018. "Identification of future signal based on the quantitative and qualitative text mining: a case study on ethical issues in artificial intelligence," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 653-667, March.
    3. Visschers, Vivianne H.M. & Siegrist, Michael, 2012. "Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 292-300.
    4. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    5. Kang, Min Jung & Park, Heejun, 2011. "Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3465-3475, June.
    6. Ann Bostrom & Ragnar E. Löfstedt, 2003. "Communicating Risk: Wireless and Hardwired," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 241-248, April.
    7. Brianne Suldovsky & William K. Hallman, 2022. "The National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard of 2016: Intersection of Technology and Public Understanding of Science in the United States," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Fung, Timothy K.F. & Choi, Doo Hun & Scheufele, Dietram A. & Shaw, Bret R., 2014. "Public opinion about biofuels: The interplay between party identification and risk/benefit perception," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 344-355.
    9. Yawson, Robert M. & Kuzma, Jennifer, 2010. "Evidence review and experts’ opinion on consumer acceptance of agrifood nanotechnology," MPRA Paper 40807, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Qi, Wen-Hui & Qi, Ming-Liang & Ji, Ya-Min, 2020. "The effect path of public communication on public acceptance of nuclear energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    11. Visschers, Vivianne H.M. & Keller, Carmen & Siegrist, Michael, 2011. "Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3621-3629, June.
    12. Geissinger, Andrea & Laurell, Christofer & Sandström, Christian, 2020. "Digital Disruption beyond Uber and Airbnb—Tracking the long tail of the sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Chang, Chiung-Ting, 2017. "Risk factors associated with flying in adverse weather: From the passengers' point of view," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 68-75.
    14. Odhiambo Norbert Omuga & Robert Moracha Ogeto & Xiongying Niu, 2021. "Effect of Determinants of Entrepreneurial Innovation on Businesses Innovation Capacity in Sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(5), pages 8-21.
    15. Tim Slack & Vanessa Parks & Lynsay Ayer & Andrew M. Parker & Melissa L. Finucane & Rajeev Ramchand, 2020. "Natech or natural? An analysis of hazard perceptions, institutional trust, and future storm worry following Hurricane Harvey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 1207-1224, July.
    16. Wang, Fan & Gu, Jibao & Wu, Jianlin, 2020. "Perspective taking, energy policy involvement, and public acceptance of nuclear energy: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    17. Dessi, F. & Ariccio, S. & Albers, T. & Alves, S. & Ludovico, N. & Bonaiuto, M., 2022. "Sustainable technology acceptability: Mapping technological, contextual, and social-psychological determinants of EU stakeholders’ biofuel acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. D'Amato, Alessio & Giaccherini, Matilde & Zoli, Mariangela, 2019. "The Role of Information Sources and Providers in Shaping Green Behaviors. Evidence from Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Xiaoqin Zhu & Xiaofei Xie, 2015. "Effects of Knowledge on Attitude Formation and Change Toward Genetically Modified Foods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 790-810, May.
    20. Seoyong Kim & Sunhee Kim, 2015. "The role of value in the social acceptance of science-technology," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 305-322, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0594-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.