IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v132y2024ics016649722400021x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When anthropomorphism backfires: Anticipation of negative social roles as a source of resistance to smart object adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Querci, Ilaria
  • Monsurrò, Luigi
  • Peverini, Paolo

Abstract

Despite the great potential of smart objects (SOs), their diffusion among consumers remains limited. Previous research on resistance to innovation cites functional, psychological, and individual barriers to consumer adoption of SOs, but it does not consider the role of SOs’ anthropomorphic features or their role as potential partners in relationships that can be referenced to interpersonal ones. We present a new theoretical lens to read consumer resistance to SOs. The new perspective is based on consumer–SO relationship literature and the fear-of-intimacy construct from the interpersonal relationship literature. The new perspective proposes that consumer resistance to SOs has a relational nature. Moreover, we support this proposition with preliminary evidence from an explorative qualitative study, based on ZMET-method interviews of non-SO users. This article reveals that consumer resistance to SOs can be read under a relational lens and shows that consumers resist adopting SOs because they experience fears related to their imagined relationships; these fears can be attributed to four negative SO social roles. This research contributes to resistance literature by suggesting that consumer resistance can have a relational nature, and to consumer–SO relationship literature, by identifying anticipated negative social roles of SOs.

Suggested Citation

  • Querci, Ilaria & Monsurrò, Luigi & Peverini, Paolo, 2024. "When anthropomorphism backfires: Anticipation of negative social roles as a source of resistance to smart object adoption," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:132:y:2024:i:c:s016649722400021x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016649722400021X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mick, David Glen & Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(2), pages 123-143, September.
    2. Barney, Christian & Hancock, Tyler & Esmark Jones, Carol L. & Kazandjian, Brett & Collier, Joel E., 2022. "Ideally human-ish: How anthropomorphized do you have to be in shopper-facing retail technology?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 685-705.
    3. Ertugrul Uysal & Sascha Alavi & Valéry Bezençon, 2022. "Trojan horse or useful helper? A relationship perspective on artificial intelligence assistants with humanlike features," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1153-1175, November.
    4. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman, 2019. "Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 216-237, March.
    5. Pizzi, Gabriele & Scarpi, Daniele & Pantano, Eleonora, 2021. "Artificial intelligence and the new forms of interaction: Who has the control when interacting with a chatbot?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 878-890.
    6. Roberts, Ruby & Flin, Rhona & Millar, David & Corradi, Luca, 2021. "Psychological factors influencing technology adoption: A case study from the oil and gas industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Dabić, Marina & Marzi, Giacomo & Vlačić, Božidar & Daim, Tugrul U. & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2021. "40 years of excellence: An overview of Technovation and a roadmap for future research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Mariani, Marcello M. & Machado, Isa & Magrelli, Vittoria & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    9. Hoch, Stephen J, 2002. "Product Experience Is Seductive," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 448-454, December.
    10. Kleijnen, Mirella & Lee, Nick & Wetzels, Martin, 2009. "An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 344-357, June.
    11. Benamar, Lamya & Balagué, Christine & Zhong, Zeling, 2020. "Internet of Things devices appropriation process: The Dynamic Interactions Value Appropriation (DIVA) framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Donna L Hoffman & Thomas P Novak & Eileen FischerEditor & Robert KozinetsAssociate Editor, 2018. "Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(6), pages 1178-1204.
    13. Trabucchi, Daniel & Patrucco, Andrea S. & Buganza, Tommaso & Marzi, Giacomo, 2023. "Is transparency the new green? How business model transparency influences digital service adoption," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    14. Zied Mani & Inès Chouk, 2019. "Impact of privacy concerns on resistance to smart services: does the ‘Big Brother effect’ matter?," Post-Print hal-03217977, HAL.
    15. Lamya Benamar & Christine Balagué & Zeling Zhong, 2020. "Internet of Things devices appropriation process : the Dynamic Interactions Value Appropriation (DIVA) framework," Post-Print hal-02376414, HAL.
    16. Inès Chouk & Zied Mani, 2017. "Drivers of consumers’ resistance to smart products," Post-Print hal-02980400, HAL.
    17. Laukkanen, Tommi, 2016. "Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet and mobile banking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2432-2439.
    18. Shilpa Madan & Krishna Savani & Constantine S. Katsikeas, 2023. "Privacy please: Power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(4), pages 731-754, June.
    19. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Mariani, Marcello & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2023. "The consequences of innovation failure: An innovation capabilities and dynamic capabilities perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    20. Shilpa Madan & Krishna Savani & Constantine S. Katsikeas, 2023. "Correction: Privacy please: power distance and people’s responses to data breaches across countries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(4), pages 755-755, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Franco, 2023. "Older consumers and technology: A critical systematic literature review," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 92-121, June.
    2. Lucia-Palacios, Laura & Pérez-López, Raúl, 2021. "Effects of Home Voice Assistants' Autonomy on Instrusiveness and Usefulness: Direct, Indirect, and Moderating Effects of Interactivity," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 41-54.
    3. Elodie Attié & Lars Meyer-Waarden, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Post-Print hal-04065165, HAL.
    4. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Rokonuzzaman, Md & Kim, Kyoungmi (Kate) & Dugar, Kranti Kumar & Fox, Jennine, 2022. "What makes an object smart? Conceptualization, development, and validation of a scale to measure the Smartness of a Thing (SoT)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 337-354.
    6. Fu, Shihui & Xue, Kunkun & Yang, Mengya & Wang, Xiaona, 2023. "An exploratory study on users' resistance to mobile app updates: Using netnography and fsQCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    8. Japutra, Arnold & Utami, Ami Fitri & Molinillo, Sebastian & Ekaputra, Irwan Adi, 2021. "Influence of customer application experience and value in use on loyalty toward retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Navid Bahmani & Amit Bhatnagar & Dinesh Gauri, 2022. "Hey, Alexa! What attributes of Skills affect firm value?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1219-1235, November.
    10. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. Zied Mani & Inès Chouk, 2018. "Consumer Resistance to Innovation in Services," Post-Print hal-03700875, HAL.
    12. Liu, Aiping & Urquía-Grande, Elena & López-Sánchez, Pilar & Rodríguez-López, Ángel, 2022. "How technology paradoxes and self-efficacy affect the resistance of facial recognition technology in online microfinance platforms: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    14. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    15. Nel, Jacques & Boshoff, Christo, 2021. "“I just don't like digital-only banks, and you should not use them either†: Traditional-bank customers' opposition to using digital-only banks," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Arghya Ray & Muskan Jain & Lan Ma & Khalid Hussain Alhamzi & Ananya Ray & Long She, 2024. "The impact of personality traits, barriers and gamification on Gen X continuance intention for mobile credit bill payment apps," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1154-1174, September.
    17. Klaus E. Meyer & Jiatao Li & Keith D. Brouthers & Ruey-Jer ‘‘Bryan’’ Jean, 2023. "International business in the digital age: Global strategies in a world of national institutions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(4), pages 577-598, June.
    18. Heidenreich, Sven & Killmer, Jan F. & Millemann, Jan A., 2022. "If at first you don't adopt - Investigating determinants of new product leapfrogging behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Poushneh, Atieh & Vasquez-Parraga, Arturo & Gearhart, Richard S., 2024. "The effect of empathetic response and consumers’ narcissism in voice-based artificial intelligence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Lars Meyer-Waarden & Julien Cloarec, 2022. "“Baby, you can drive my car”: Psychological antecedents that drive consumers’ adoption of AI-powered autonomous vehicles," Post-Print hal-03385891, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:132:y:2024:i:c:s016649722400021x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.