IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v82y2012i8p1623-1628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An inductive order construction for the difference of two dependent proportions

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Weizhen

Abstract

This paper concerns interval estimation for the difference of two dependent proportions. An order on the sample space is constructed using an inductive method; then the smallest one-sided 1−α confidence interval under the order is derived. This interval is admissible under the set inclusion criterion, and is illustrated in two examples. An R-code is used to compute the proposed order and interval.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Weizhen, 2012. "An inductive order construction for the difference of two dependent proportions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(8), pages 1623-1628.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:82:y:2012:i:8:p:1623-1628
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2012.03.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715212001289
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2012.03.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris J. Lloyd & Paul Kabaila, 2003. "On the Optimality and Limitations of Buehler Bounds," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 45(2), pages 167-174, June.
    2. Quinn McNemar, 1947. "Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 12(2), pages 153-157, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lloyd, Chris J., 2008. "More powerful exact tests of binary matched pairs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(16), pages 2592-2596, November.
    2. Uttam Bandyopadhyay & Atanu Biswas & Shirsendu Mukherjee, 2009. "Adaptive two-treatment two-period crossover design for binary treatment responses incorporating carry-over effects," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 18(1), pages 13-33, March.
    3. Chacón, José E. & Fernández Serrano, Javier, 2024. "Bayesian taut splines for estimating the number of modes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Wittkowski, Knut M., 2003. "Novel Methods for Multivariate Ordinal Data applied to Genetic Diplotypes, Genomic Pathways, Risk Profiles, and Pattern Similarity," MPRA Paper 4570, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Sauter, Philipp A. & Mußhoff, Oliver & Möhring, Bernhard & Wilhelm, Stefan, 2016. "Faustmann vs. real options theory – An experimental investigation of foresters’ harvesting decisions," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-20.
    6. Citlali Calderon & Lorena Carrete & Jorge Vera-Martínez & María Esther Gloria-Quintero & María del Socorro Romero-Figueroa, 2021. "A Social Marketing Intervention to Improve Treatment Adherence in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Peter Cummings & Barbara McKnight, 2004. "Analysis of matched cohort data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 4(3), pages 274-281, September.
    8. Bester Tawona Mudereri & Elfatih M. Abdel-Rahman & Shepard Ndlela & Louisa Delfin Mutsa Makumbe & Christabel Chiedza Nyanga & Henri E. Z. Tonnang & Samira A. Mohamed, 2022. "Integrating the Strength of Multi-Date Sentinel-1 and -2 Datasets for Detecting Mango ( Mangifera indica L.) Orchards in a Semi-Arid Environment in Zimbabwe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Am鬩e Charles & Olivier Darn頍 & Jae H. Kim & Etienne Redor, 2016. "Stock exchange mergers and market efficiency," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(7), pages 576-589, February.
    10. Nosi, Costanza & D’Agostino, Antonella & Pratesi, Carlo Alberto & Barbarossa, Camilla, 2021. "Evaluating a social marketing campaign on healthy nutrition and lifestyle among primary-school children: A mixed-method research design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Barigozzi, Matteo & Hallin, Marc, 2020. "Generalized dynamic factor models and volatilities: Consistency, rates, and prediction intervals," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 4-34.
    12. Md Saiful Islam & Md Sarowar Morshed & Gary J Young & Md Noor-E-Alam, 2019. "Robust policy evaluation from large-scale observational studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
    13. John E. Core, 2010. "Discussion of Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and Accounting Irregularities," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 273-287, May.
    14. Hamza Zubair & Ampol Karoonsoontawong & Kunnawee Kanitpong, 2022. "Effects of COVID-19 on Travel Behavior and Mode Choice: A Case Study for the Bangkok Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    15. Hemang Subramanian & Eric Overby, 2017. "Electronic Commerce, Spatial Arbitrage, and Market Efficiency," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 97-116, March.
    16. Preety Srivastava & Xueyan Zhao, 2010. "What Do the Bingers Drink? Micro‐Unit Evidence on Negative Externalities and Drinker Characteristics of Alcohol Consumption by Beverage Types," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 29(2), pages 229-250, June.
    17. Hanousek Jan & Kočenda Evžen & Novotný Jan, 2012. "The identification of price jumps," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 53-77, January.
    18. Sameer Parpia & John Koval & Allan Donner, 2013. "Evaluation of confidence intervals for the kappa statistic when the assumption of marginal homogeneity is violated," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2709-2718, December.
    19. Bianchi, Daniele & Babiak, Mykola, 2022. "On the performance of cryptocurrency funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Nathan Robert Neale & Kenneth D. Butterfield & Jerry Goodstein & Thomas M. Tripp, 2020. "Managers’ Restorative Versus Punitive Responses to Employee Wrongdoing: A Qualitative Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 603-625, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:82:y:2012:i:8:p:1623-1628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.