IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v79y2009i3p295-303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on the asymptotic variance at optimal levels of a bias-corrected Hill estimator

Author

Listed:
  • Gomes, M. Ivette
  • Pestana, Dinis
  • Caeiro, Frederico

Abstract

For heavy tails, with a positive tail index [gamma], classical tail index estimators, like the Hill estimator, are known to be quite sensitive to the number of top order statistics k used in the estimation, whereas second-order reduced-bias estimators show much less sensitivity to changes in k. In the recent minimum-variance reduced-bias (MVRB) tail index estimators, the estimation of the second order parameters in the bias has been performed at a level k1 of a larger order than that of the level k at which we compute the tail index estimators. Such a procedure enables us to keep the asymptotic variance of the new estimators equal to the asymptotic variance of the Hill estimator, for all k at which we can guarantee the asymptotic normality of the Hill statistics. These values of k, as well as larger values of k, will also enable us to guarantee the asymptotic normality of the reduced-bias estimators, but, to reach the minimal mean squared error of these MVRB estimators, we need to work with levels k and k1 of the same order. In this note we derive the way the asymptotic variance varies as a function of q, the finite limiting value of k/k1, as the sample size n increases to infinity.

Suggested Citation

  • Gomes, M. Ivette & Pestana, Dinis & Caeiro, Frederico, 2009. "A note on the asymptotic variance at optimal levels of a bias-corrected Hill estimator," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 295-303, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:3:p:295-303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(08)00401-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. De Haan & L. Peng, 1998. "Comparison of tail index estimators," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 52(1), pages 60-70, March.
    2. Gomes, M. Ivette & Pestana, Dinis, 2007. "A Sturdy Reduced-Bias Extreme Quantile (VaR) Estimator," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 280-292, March.
    3. Liang Peng & Yongcheng Qi, 2004. "Estimating the First‐ and Second‐Order Parameters of a Heavy‐Tailed Distribution," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 46(2), pages 305-312, June.
    4. M. Ivette Gomes & Laurens De Haan & Lígia Henriques Rodrigues, 2008. "Tail index estimation for heavy‐tailed models: accommodation of bias in weighted log‐excesses," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 31-52, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vygantas Paulauskas & Marijus Vaičiulis, 2017. "A class of new tail index estimators," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(2), pages 461-487, April.
    2. Daouia, Abdelaati & Girard, Stéphane & Stupfler, Gilles, 2021. "ExpectHill estimation, extreme risk and heavy tails," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 97-117.
    3. El Methni, Jonathan & Stupfler, Gilles, 2018. "Improved estimators of extreme Wang distortion risk measures for very heavy-tailed distributions," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 129-148.
    4. Tertius de Wet & Yuri Goegebeur & Armelle Guillou, 2012. "Weighted Moment Estimators for the Second Order Scale Parameter," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 753-783, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fátima Brilhante, M. & Ivette Gomes, M. & Pestana, Dinis, 2013. "A simple generalisation of the Hill estimator," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 518-535.
    2. Wager, Stefan, 2014. "Subsampling extremes: From block maxima to smooth tail estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 335-353.
    3. M. Ivette Gomes & Armelle Guillou, 2015. "Extreme Value Theory and Statistics of Univariate Extremes: A Review," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 263-292, August.
    4. Frederico Caeiro & M. Gomes, 2009. "Semi-parametric second-order reduced-bias high quantile estimation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 392-413, August.
    5. Nieto, Maria Rosa & Ruiz, Esther, 2016. "Frontiers in VaR forecasting and backtesting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 475-501.
    6. Araújo Santos, Paulo & Fraga Alves, Isabel & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2013. "High quantiles estimation with Quasi-PORT and DPOT: An application to value-at-risk for financial variables," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 487-496.
    7. Wendy Shinyie & Noriszura Ismail & Abdul Jemain, 2014. "Semi-parametric Estimation Based on Second Order Parameter for Selecting Optimal Threshold of Extreme Rainfall Events," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(11), pages 3489-3514, September.
    8. Gomes, M. Ivette & Brilhante, M. Fátima & Caeiro, Frederico & Pestana, Dinis, 2015. "A new partially reduced-bias mean-of-order p class of extreme value index estimators," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 223-237.
    9. Lígia Henriques-Rodrigues & Frederico Caeiro & M. Ivette Gomes, 2024. "A New Class of Reduced-Bias Generalized Hill Estimators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Ivanilda Cabral & Frederico Caeiro & M. Ivette Gomes, 2022. "On the comparison of several classical estimators of the extreme value index," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 179-196, January.
    11. Frederico Caeiro & M. Ivette Gomes & Björn Vandewalle, 2014. "Semi-Parametric Probability-Weighted Moments Estimation Revisited," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Gaoge Hu & Shesheng Gao & Yongmin Zhong & Chengfan Gu, 2014. "Random weighting estimation of stable exponent," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 451-468, May.
    13. Rassoul, Abdelaziz, 2013. "Kernel-type estimator of the conditional tail expectation for a heavy-tailed distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 698-703.
    14. Igor Fedotenkov, 2020. "A Review of More than One Hundred Pareto-Tail Index Estimators," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 80(3), pages 245-299.
    15. Dierckx, Goedele & Goegebeur, Yuri & Guillou, Armelle, 2013. "An asymptotically unbiased minimum density power divergence estimator for the Pareto-tail index," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 70-86.
    16. Wang, Yulong & Xiao, Zhijie, 2022. "Estimation and inference about tail features with tail censored data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 363-387.
    17. Maarten R C van Oordt & Chen Zhou, 2019. "Estimating Systematic Risk under Extremely Adverse Market Conditions," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 432-461.
    18. Igor Fedotenkov, 2013. "A bootstrap method to test for the existence of finite moments," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 315-322, June.
    19. Gomes, M. Ivette & Hall, Andreia & Miranda, M. Cristina, 2008. "Subsampling techniques and the Jackknife methodology in the estimation of the extremal index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2022-2041, January.
    20. Daouia, Abdelaati & Stupfler, Gilles & Usseglio-Carleve, Antoine, 2022. "Inference for extremal regression with dependent heavy-tailed data," TSE Working Papers 22-1324, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised 29 Aug 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:79:y:2009:i:3:p:295-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.