IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v78y2008i12p1422-1429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assumption for the development of bootstrap variants of the Akaike information criterion in mixed models

Author

Listed:
  • Shang, Junfeng
  • Cavanaugh, Joseph E.

Abstract

This note provides a proof of a fundamental assumption in the verification of bootstrap AIC variants in mixed models. The assumption links the bootstrap data and the original sample data via the log-likelihood function, and is the key condition used in the validation of the criterion penalty terms. (See Assumption 3 of both Shibata [Shibata, R., 1997. Bootstrap estimate of Kullback-Leibler information for model selection. Statistica Sinica 7, 375-394] and Shang and Cavanaugh [Shang, J., Cavanaugh, J.E., 2008. Bootstrap variants of the Akaike information criterion for mixed model selection. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 52, 2004-2021]. To state the assumption, let Y and Y* represent the response vector and the corresponding bootstrap sample, respectively. Let [theta] represent the set of parameters for a candidate mixed model, and let denote the corresponding maximum likelihood estimator based on maximizing the likelihood L([theta]|Y). With E* denoting the expectation with respect to the bootstrap distribution of Y*, the assumption asserts that . We prove that the assumption holds under parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric bootstrapping.

Suggested Citation

  • Shang, Junfeng & Cavanaugh, Joseph E., 2008. "An assumption for the development of bootstrap variants of the Akaike information criterion in mixed models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(12), pages 1422-1429, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:78:y:2008:i:12:p:1422-1429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(07)00424-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morris, Jeffrey S., 2002. "The BLUPs are not "best" when it comes to bootstrapping," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 425-430, February.
    2. Shang, Junfeng & Cavanaugh, Joseph E., 2008. "Bootstrap variants of the Akaike information criterion for mixed model selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2004-2021, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Breitkreuz & Gabriela Brückner & Jan Pablo Burgard & Joscha Krause & Ralf Münnich & Helmut Schröder & Katrin Schüssel, 2019. "Schätzung kleinräumiger Krankheitshäufigkeiten für die deutsche Bevölkerung anhand von Routinedaten am Beispiel von Typ-2-Diabetes [Estimation of regional diabetes type 2 prevalence in the German p," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 13(1), pages 35-72, April.
    2. Brian Gray & Vyacheslav Lyubchich & Yulia Gel & James Rogala & Dale Robertson & Xiaoqiao Wei, 2016. "Estimation of river and stream temperature trends under haphazard sampling," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(1), pages 89-105, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simona Buscemi & Antonella Plaia, 2020. "Model selection in linear mixed-effect models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(4), pages 529-575, December.
    2. Paul Anand & Jere R. Behrman & Hai-Anh H. Dang & Sam Jones, 2019. "Does sorting matter for learning inequality?Evidence from East Africa," PIER Working Paper Archive 20-006, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    3. Marhuenda, Yolanda & Morales, Domingo & del Carmen Pardo, María, 2014. "Information criteria for Fay–Herriot model selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 268-280.
    4. Fábio Bayer & Francisco Cribari-Neto, 2015. "Bootstrap-based model selection criteria for beta regressions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(4), pages 776-795, December.
    5. Flores-Agreda, Daniel & Cantoni, Eva, 2019. "Bootstrap estimation of uncertainty in prediction for generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-17.
    6. Shang, Junfeng & Cavanaugh, Joseph E., 2008. "Bootstrap variants of the Akaike information criterion for mixed model selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2004-2021, January.
    7. Yu, Dalei & Zhang, Xinyu & Yau, Kelvin K.W., 2013. "Information based model selection criteria for generalized linear mixed models with unknown variance component parameters," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 245-262.
    8. Kin Yau Wong & Yair Goldberg & Jason P. Fine, 2016. "Oracle estimation of parametric models under boundary constraints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1173-1183, December.
    9. Thomas Gkelsinis & Alex Karagrigoriou, 2020. "Theoretical Aspects on Measures of Directed Information with Simulations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Bernard Roblès & Manuel Avila & Florent Duculty & Pascal Vrignat & Stephane Bégot & Frédéric Kratz, 2014. "Hidden Markov model framework for industrial maintenance activities," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(3), pages 230-242, June.
    11. Brian Gray & Vyacheslav Lyubchich & Yulia Gel & James Rogala & Dale Robertson & Xiaoqiao Wei, 2016. "Estimation of river and stream temperature trends under haphazard sampling," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(1), pages 89-105, March.
    12. Dimova, Rositsa B. & Markatou, Marianthi & Talal, Andrew H., 2011. "Information methods for model selection in linear mixed effects models with application to HCV data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 2677-2697, September.
    13. G. Avlogiaris & A. C. Micheas & K. Zografos, 2019. "A Criterion for Local Model Selection," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 81(2), pages 406-444, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:78:y:2008:i:12:p:1422-1429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.