IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v59y2002i2p135-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data analysis in supersaturated designs

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Runze
  • Lin, Dennis K. J.

Abstract

Supersaturated designs (SSDs) can save considerable cost in industrial experimentation when many potential factors are introduced in preliminary studies. Analyzing data in SSDs is challenging because the number of experiments is less than the number of candidate factors. In this paper, we introduce a variable selection approach to identifying the active effects in SSD via nonconvex penalized least squares. An iterative ridge regression is employed to find the solution of the penalized least squares. We provide both theoretical and empirical justifications for the proposed approach. Some related issues are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Runze & Lin, Dennis K. J., 2002. "Data analysis in supersaturated designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 135-144, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:59:y:2002:i:2:p:135-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(02)00140-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    2. Jianqing Fan, 1997. "Comments on «Wavelets in statistics: A review» by A. Antoniadis," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 6(2), pages 131-138, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Peng & Zhao, Shengli & Zhang, Runchu, 2010. "A cluster analysis selection strategy for supersaturated designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1605-1612, June.
    2. Das, Ujjwal & Gupta, Sudhir & Gupta, Shuva, 2014. "Screening active factors in supersaturated designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 223-232.
    3. N. Balakrishnan & C. Koukouvinos & C. Parpoula, 2015. "Analyzing supersaturated designs for discrete responses via generalized linear models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 121-145, February.
    4. Georgiou, Stelios D., 2008. "Modelling by supersaturated designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 428-435, December.
    5. Chun-Wei Zheng & Zong-Feng Qi & Qiao-Zhen Zhang & Min-Qian Liu, 2022. "A Method for Augmenting Supersaturated Designs with Newly Added Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Yamada, Shu & Matsui, Michiyo & Matsui, Tomomi & Lin, Dennis K.J. & Takahashi, Takenori, 2006. "A general construction method for mixed-level supersaturated design," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 254-265, January.
    7. Marley, Christopher J. & Woods, David C., 2010. "A comparison of design and model selection methods for supersaturated experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3158-3167, December.
    8. N. Balakrishnan & C. Koukouvinos & C. Parpoula, 2013. "An information theoretical algorithm for analyzing supersaturated designs for a binary response," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanouil Androulakis & Christos Koukouvinos & Kalliopi Mylona & Filia Vonta, 2010. "A real survival analysis application via variable selection methods for Cox's proportional hazards model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 1399-1406.
    2. A. Karagrigoriou & C. Koukouvinos & K. Mylona, 2010. "On the advantages of the non-concave penalized likelihood model selection method with minimum prediction errors in large-scale medical studies," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 13-24.
    3. Gao, Yan & Zhang, Xinyu & Wang, Shouyang & Zou, Guohua, 2016. "Model averaging based on leave-subject-out cross-validation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 139-151.
    4. Jin-Chuan Duan & Weimin Miao, 2016. "Default Correlations and Large-Portfolio Credit Analysis," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 536-546, October.
    5. Benjamin Poignard, 2020. "Asymptotic theory of the adaptive Sparse Group Lasso," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(1), pages 297-328, February.
    6. Chalise, Prabhakar & Fridley, Brooke L., 2012. "Comparison of penalty functions for sparse canonical correlation analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 245-254.
    7. Abhik Ghosh & Magne Thoresen, 2018. "Non-concave penalization in linear mixed-effect models and regularized selection of fixed effects," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(2), pages 179-210, April.
    8. Zongwu Cai & Xian Wang, 2014. "Selection of Mixed Copula Model via Penalized Likelihood," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(506), pages 788-801, June.
    9. Li Xiang & Hu Xuemei & Yang Junwen, 2023. "Regularized Poisson regressions predict regional innovation output," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(8), pages 2197-2216, December.
    10. Lee, Youngjo & Oh, Hee-Seok, 2014. "A new sparse variable selection via random-effect model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 89-99.
    11. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    12. Xu, Yang & Zhao, Shishun & Hu, Tao & Sun, Jianguo, 2021. "Variable selection for generalized odds rate mixture cure models with interval-censored failure time data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Singh, Rakhi & Stufken, John, 2024. "Factor selection in screening experiments by aggregation over random models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    14. Lili Pan & Ziyan Luo & Naihua Xiu, 2017. "Restricted Robinson Constraint Qualification and Optimality for Cardinality-Constrained Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 104-118, October.
    15. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2018. "Tree-structured modelling of categorical predictors in generalized additive regression," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 737-758, September.
    16. Chenchuan (Mark) Li & Ulrich K. Müller, 2021. "Linear regression with many controls of limited explanatory power," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), pages 405-442, May.
    17. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    18. Hang Yu & Yuanjia Wang & Donglin Zeng, 2023. "A general framework of nonparametric feature selection in high‐dimensional data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 951-963, June.
    19. Qianyun Li & Runmin Shi & Faming Liang, 2019. "Drug sensitivity prediction with high-dimensional mixture regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Shuang Zhang & Xingdong Feng, 2022. "Distributed identification of heterogeneous treatment effects," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 57-89, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:59:y:2002:i:2:p:135-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.