IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v54y2010i12p3158-3167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of design and model selection methods for supersaturated experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Marley, Christopher J.
  • Woods, David C.

Abstract

Various design and model selection methods are available for supersaturated designs having more factors than runs but little research is available on their comparison and evaluation. Simulated experiments are used to evaluate the use of E(s2)-optimal and Bayesian D-optimal designs and to compare three analysis strategies representing regression, shrinkage and a novel model-averaging procedure. Suggestions are made for choosing the values of the tuning constants for each approach. Findings include that (i) the preferred analysis is via shrinkage; (ii) designs with similar numbers of runs and factors can be effective for a considerable number of active effects of only moderate size; and (iii)Â unbalanced designs can perform well. Some comments are made on the performance of the design and analysis methods when effect sparsity does not hold.

Suggested Citation

  • Marley, Christopher J. & Woods, David C., 2010. "A comparison of design and model selection methods for supersaturated experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3158-3167, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:12:p:3158-3167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(10)00082-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. M. Lewis & A. M. Dean, 2001. "Detection of interactions in experiments on large numbers of factors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(4), pages 633-672.
    2. Li, Runze & Lin, Dennis K. J., 2002. "Data analysis in supersaturated designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 135-144, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Rakhi & Stufken, John, 2024. "Factor selection in screening experiments by aggregation over random models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. VÁZQUEZ-ALCOCER, Alan & SCHOEN, Eric D. & GOOS, Peter, 2018. "A mixed integer optimization approach for model selection in screening experiments," Working Papers 2018007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    3. Bradley Jones & Dibyen Majumdar, 2014. "Optimal Supersaturated Designs," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(508), pages 1592-1600, December.
    4. Edwards, David J. & Mee, Robert W., 2011. "Supersaturated designs: Are our results significant?," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 2652-2664, September.
    5. Das, Ujjwal & Gupta, Sudhir & Gupta, Shuva, 2014. "Screening active factors in supersaturated designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 223-232.
    6. N. Balakrishnan & C. Koukouvinos & C. Parpoula, 2015. "Analyzing supersaturated designs for discrete responses via generalized linear models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 121-145, February.
    7. Gutman, Alex J. & White, Edward D. & Lin, Dennis K.J. & Hill, Raymond R., 2014. "Augmenting supersaturated designs with Bayesian D-optimality," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1147-1158.
    8. Crabbe, M. & Vandebroek, M., 2012. "Improving the efficiency of individualized designs for the mixed logit choice model by including covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 2059-2072.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Peng & Zhao, Shengli & Zhang, Runchu, 2010. "A cluster analysis selection strategy for supersaturated designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1605-1612, June.
    2. Wang, S. & Huang, G.H., 2014. "An integrated approach for water resources decision making under interactive and compound uncertainties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 32-40.
    3. Zhengping Liu & Wang Zhang & Hongxian Liu & Guohe Huang & Jiliang Zhen & Xin Qi, 2019. "Characterization of Renewable Energy Utilization Mode for Air-Environmental Quality Improvement through an Inexact Factorial Optimization Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Wang, S. & Huang, G.H., 2015. "A multi-level Taguchi-factorial two-stage stochastic programming approach for characterization of parameter uncertainties and their interactions: An application to water resources management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 572-581.
    5. Das, Ujjwal & Gupta, Sudhir & Gupta, Shuva, 2014. "Screening active factors in supersaturated designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 223-232.
    6. Michael Rosenblum & Ethan X. Fang & Han Liu, 2020. "Optimal, two‐stage, adaptive enrichment designs for randomized trials, using sparse linear programming," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(3), pages 749-772, July.
    7. Dean, A. M. & Lewis, S. M., 2002. "Comparison of group screening strategies for factorial experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 287-297, May.
    8. Chun-Wei Zheng & Zong-Feng Qi & Qiao-Zhen Zhang & Min-Qian Liu, 2022. "A Method for Augmenting Supersaturated Designs with Newly Added Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. N. Balakrishnan & C. Koukouvinos & C. Parpoula, 2015. "Analyzing supersaturated designs for discrete responses via generalized linear models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 121-145, February.
    10. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2007. "Screening Experiments for Simulation : A Review," Other publications TiSEM 164486bc-0852-4d15-bdf8-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2007. "Screening Experiments for Simulation : A Review," Discussion Paper 2007-21, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    12. Emanuele Borgonovo & Elmar Plischke & Giovanni Rabitti, 2022. "Interactions and computer experiments," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 1274-1303, September.
    13. Yamada, Shu & Matsui, Michiyo & Matsui, Tomomi & Lin, Dennis K.J. & Takahashi, Takenori, 2006. "A general construction method for mixed-level supersaturated design," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 254-265, January.
    14. Hong Wan & Bruce E. Ankenman & Barry L. Nelson, 2006. "Controlled Sequential Bifurcation: A New Factor-Screening Method for Discrete-Event Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 743-755, August.
    15. Last, Michael & Luta, Gheorghe & Orso, Alex & Porter, Adam & Young, Stan, 2008. "Pooled ANOVA," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5215-5228, August.
    16. Georgiou, Stelios D., 2008. "Modelling by supersaturated designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 428-435, December.
    17. N. Balakrishnan & C. Koukouvinos & C. Parpoula, 2013. "An information theoretical algorithm for analyzing supersaturated designs for a binary response," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:12:p:3158-3167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.