IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v47y2000i4p329-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A pairwise likelihood approach to analyzing correlated binary data

Author

Listed:
  • Kuk, Anthony Y. C.
  • Nott, David J.

Abstract

The method of pairwise likelihood is investigated for analyzing clustered or longitudinal binary data. The pairwise likelihood is a product of bivariate likelihoods for within cluster pairs of observations, and its maximizer is the maximum pairwise likelihood estimator. We discuss the computational advantages of pairwise likelihood relative to competing approaches, present some efficiency calculations and argue that when cluster sizes are unequal a weighted pairwise likelihood should be used for the marginal regression parameters, whereas the unweighted pairwise likelihood should be used for the association parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuk, Anthony Y. C. & Nott, David J., 2000. "A pairwise likelihood approach to analyzing correlated binary data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 329-335, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:47:y:2000:i:4:p:329-335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(99)00174-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. le Cessie & J. C. van Houwelingen, 1994. "Logistic Regression for Correlated Binary Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 43(1), pages 95-108, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M.-L. Feddag, 2016. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for the normal ogive model with binary data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 100(2), pages 223-237, April.
    2. Renard, Didier & Molenberghs, Geert & Geys, Helena, 2004. "A pairwise likelihood approach to estimation in multilevel probit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 649-667, January.
    3. Shujie Ma & Yanyuan Ma & Yanqing Wang & Eli S. Kravitz & Raymond J. Carroll, 2017. "A Semiparametric Single-Index Risk Score Across Populations," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(520), pages 1648-1662, October.
    4. Joe, Harry & Lee, Youngjo, 2009. "On weighting of bivariate margins in pairwise likelihood," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(4), pages 670-685, April.
    5. Bhat, Chandra R., 2011. "The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 923-939, August.
    6. Reem Aljarallah & Samer A Kharroubi, 2021. "Use of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods to Model Kuwait Medical Genetic Center Data: An Application to Down Syndrome and Mental Retardation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Euán, Carolina & Sun, Ying, 2020. "Bernoulli vector autoregressive model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Spiess, Martin & Hamerle, Alfred, 2000. "A comparison of different methods for the estimation of regression models with correlated binary responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 439-455, June.
    9. Paleti, Rajesh & Bhat, Chandra R., 2013. "The composite marginal likelihood (CML) estimation of panel ordered-response models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 24-43.
    10. Paik, Jane & Ying, Zhiliang, 2012. "A composite likelihood approach for spatially correlated survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 209-216, January.
    11. Johan Verbeeck & Martin Geroldinger & Konstantin Thiel & Andrew Craig Hooker & Sebastian Ueckert & Mats Karlsson & Arne Cornelius Bathke & Johann Wolfgang Bauer & Geert Molenberghs & Georg Zimmermann, 2023. "How to analyze continuous and discrete repeated measures in small‐sample cross‐over trials?," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3998-4011, December.
    12. Lajmi Lakhal-Chaieb & Thierry Duchesne, 2017. "Association measures for bivariate failure times in the presence of a cure fraction," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 517-532, October.
    13. Peng, Cheng & Yang, Yihe & Zhou, Jie & Pan, Jianxin, 2022. "Latent Gaussian copula models for longitudinal binary data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. Vaclav Fidler & Nico Nagelkerke, 2013. "The Mantel-Haenszel Procedure Revisited: Models and Generalizations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-4, March.
    15. Taha Hossein Rashidi & Matthew J. Roorda, 2018. "A business establishment fleet ownership and composition model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 971-987, May.
    16. Hatzikyriakou, Adam & Lin, Ning, 2017. "Impact of performance interdependencies on structural vulnerability: A systems perspective of storm surge risk to coastal residential communities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 106-116.
    17. Yang Wu & Malay Ghosh, 2017. "Asymptotic Expansion of the Posterior Based on Pairwise Likelihood," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 79(1), pages 39-75, February.
    18. Wimhurst, Joshua J. & Greene, J. Scott & Koch, Jennifer, 2023. "Predicting commercial wind farm site suitability in the conterminous United States using a logistic regression model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    19. Olfa KAMMOUN & Mohieddine RAHMOUNI, 2013. "Intellectual Property Rights, Appropriation Instruments and Innovation Activities: Evidence from Tunisian Firms," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2013-01, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    20. Feddag, M.-L. & Bacci, S., 2009. "Pairwise likelihood for the longitudinal mixed Rasch model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1027-1037, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:47:y:2000:i:4:p:329-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.