IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v63y2006i11p2755-2769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to condom purchasing: Effects of product positioning on reactions to condoms

Author

Listed:
  • Scott-Sheldon, Lori A.J.
  • Glasford, Demis E.
  • Marsh, Kerry L.
  • Lust, Sarah A.

Abstract

Correct and consistent condom use has been promoted as a method to prevent sexually transmitted infections including HIV. Yet research has repeatedly shown that people fail to use condoms consistently. One influence on the pervasive lack of condom use that has received relatively little attention is the context in which consumers are exposed to condoms (i.e., how condoms are displayed in retail settings). In this paper we present two studies explored variations in condom shelf placement and its effects on people's condom attitudes and acquisition. Study 1 explored the shelf placement of condoms in 59 retail outlets in Connecticut, USA and found that condoms were typically located in areas of high visibility (e.g., next to the pharmacy counter) and on shelves adjacent to feminine hygiene and disease treatment products. In Study 2, 120 heterosexual undergraduate students at the University of Connecticut were randomly assigned to evaluate condoms adjacent to sensual, positive, neutral, or negative products and found that overall men reported more positive attitudes and acquired more condoms when exposed to condoms in a sensual context compared to women in the same condition. Among women, condom attitudes were more positive in the context of neutral products; condom acquisition was strongest for women exposed to condoms in the positive aisles. These results suggest a gender-specific approach to condom promotion. Implications of these studies for HIV prevention, public health, and condom marketing strategies are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott-Sheldon, Lori A.J. & Glasford, Demis E. & Marsh, Kerry L. & Lust, Sarah A., 2006. "Barriers to condom purchasing: Effects of product positioning on reactions to condoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2755-2769, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:63:y:2006:i:11:p:2755-2769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(06)00358-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blake, S.M. & Ledsky, R. & Goodenow, C. & Sawyer, R. & Lohrmann, D. & Windsor, R., 2003. "Condom Availability Programs in Massachusetts High Schools: Relationships with Condom Use and Sexual Behavior," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(6), pages 955-962.
    2. Dahl, Darren W & Manchanda, Rajesh V & Argo, Jennifer J, 2001. "Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 473-481, December.
    3. Cohen, D.A. & Farley, T.A. & Bedimo-Etame, J.R. & Scribner, R. & Ward, W. & Kendall, C. & Rice, J., 1999. "Implementation of condom social marketing in Louisiana, 1993 to 1996," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(2), pages 204-208.
    4. Anderson, J.E., 2003. "Condom Use and HIV Risk among US Adults," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(6), pages 912-914.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William D. Evans & Alec Ulasevich & Megan Hatheway & Bidia Deperthes, 2020. "Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature on Global Condom Promotion Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer K D’Angelo & Kristin Diehl & Lisa A Cavanaugh, 2019. "Lead by Example? Custom-Made Examples Created by Close Others Lead Consumers to Make Dissimilar Choices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 750-773.
    2. Sweldens, Steven & Puntoni, Stefano & Paolacci, Gabriele & Vissers, Maarten, 2014. "The bias in the bias: Comparative optimism as a function of event social undesirability," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 229-244.
    3. Kristensen, Frederikke Frehr & Sharp, Paul, 2021. "Disease Surveillance, Mortality and Race: The Case of HIV/AIDS in the United States," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 553, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    4. Mäenpää, Katariina & Kale, Sudhir H. & Kuusela, Hannu & Mesiranta, Nina, 2008. "Consumer perceptions of Internet banking in Finland: The moderating role of familiarity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 266-276.
    5. Hwang, YooHee & Shin, Joongwon & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "So private, yet so public: The impact of spatial distance, other diners, and power on solo dining experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 36-47.
    6. Worawan Tipwareerom & Linda Weglicki, 2017. "Parents' knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and barriers to promoting condom use among their adolescent sons," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 212-219, June.
    7. Jana Holthöwer & Jenny Doorn, 2023. "Robots do not judge: service robots can alleviate embarrassment in service encounters," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 767-784, July.
    8. Stefan Trautmann & Ferdinand Vieider & Peter Wakker, 2008. "Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 225-243, June.
    9. Banik, Shanta & Gao, Yongqiang & Rabbanee, Fazlul K., 2019. "Status demotion in hierarchical loyalty programs and its effects on switching: Identifying mediators and moderators in the Chinese context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 125-134.
    10. Kohei Kawaguchi & Kosuke Uetake & Yasutora Watanabe, 2019. "Effectiveness of Product Recommendations Under Time and Crowd Pressures," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 253-273, March.
    11. Stephanie Earnshaw & Katherine Hicks & Anke Richter & Amanda Honeycutt, 2007. "A linear programming model for allocating HIV prevention funds with state agencies: a pilot study," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 239-252, September.
    12. Abhigyan Sarkar & Juhi Gahlot Sarkar & S. Sreejesh & M. R. Anusree & Bikramjit Rishi, 2020. "You are so embarrassing, still, I hate you less! Investigating consumers’ brand embarrassment and brand hate," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 93-107, January.
    13. Myles Landers, V. & Esmark Jones, Carol L. & Barney, Christian, 2024. "The social influence of employee groups: Understanding the impact of employee groups on customer intentions through intimidation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Esmark, Carol L. & Noble, Stephanie M. & Breazeale, Michael J., 2017. "I’ll Be Watching You: Shoppers’ Reactions to Perceptions of Being Watched by Employees," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 336-349.
    15. Dhruv Grewal & Stephanie M. Noble & Anne L. Roggeveen & Jens Nordfalt, 2020. "The future of in-store technology," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 96-113, January.
    16. Roshni Raveendhran & Nathanael J. Fast, 2024. "When and why consumers prefer human-free behavior tracking products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 395-408, September.
    17. He, Yi & Chen, Qimei & Alden, Dana L., 2012. "Consumption in the public eye: The influence of social presence on service experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 302-310.
    18. Herter, Márcia Maurer & Borges, Adilson & Pinto, Diego Costa, 2021. "Which emotions make you healthier? The effects of sadness, embarrassment, and construal level on healthy behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 147-158.
    19. Ringler, Christine & Jones, Carol L. Esmark & Stevens, Jennifer L., 2022. "The Ostrich effect: Feeling hidden amidst the ambient sound of human voices," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 593-610.
    20. Farhan Ahmed & DaPeng Liang & Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah & Muddassar Sarfraz & Zeeshan Saeed, 2022. "The impact of perceived customer discrimination on negative word-of-mouth: the mediating role of customer embarrassment," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:63:y:2006:i:11:p:2755-2769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.