IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v361y2024ics0277953624008268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The built environment and its association with type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

Author

Listed:
  • Feyissa, Tesfaye Regassa
  • Wood, Sarah M.
  • Vakil, Krishna
  • MC Namara, Kevin
  • Coffee, Neil T.
  • Alsharrah, Saad
  • Daniel, Mark
  • Versace, Vincent L.

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically review longitudinal studies examining associations between the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and built environmental factors. This review adhered to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Longitudinal studies examining associations between T2DM incidence and built environmental features were eligible. Built environment constructs corresponded to the following themes: 1) Walkability – factors such as sidewalks/footpaths, crosswalks, parks, and density of businesses and services; (2) Green/open space – size, greenness, and type of available public outdoor spaces; (3) Food environment – ratio of healthful food outlets (e.g., greengrocers, butchers, supermarkets, and health food shops) to unhealthful food outlets (e.g., fast-food outlets, sweet food retailers, and convenience stores). Five databases (e.g., Medline) were searched from inception until July 2023. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis were used to summarise key findings, including a meta-analysis of adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR).

Suggested Citation

  • Feyissa, Tesfaye Regassa & Wood, Sarah M. & Vakil, Krishna & MC Namara, Kevin & Coffee, Neil T. & Alsharrah, Saad & Daniel, Mark & Versace, Vincent L., 2024. "The built environment and its association with type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624008268
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624008268
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:361:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624008268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.