IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v10y2022i2p32-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Child‐Led Participation: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Tania Mateos-Blanco

    (Departamento de Teoría e Historia de la Educación y Pedagogía Social, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain)

  • Encarnación Sánchez‐Lissen

    (Departamento de Teoría e Historia de la Educación y Pedagogía Social, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain)

  • Inés Gil‐Jaurena

    (Departamento de Teoría de la Educación y Pedagogía Social, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Spain)

  • Clara Romero‐Pérez

    (Departamento de Teoría e Historia de la Educación y Pedagogía Social, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

Children’s participation is a universal right recognised by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. This right corresponds to an image of children as social actors because of their relevant role in achieving inclusive, equitable, and sustainable development. Participation can take different forms and levels of involvement: consultative, collaborative, and child‐led. This study aimed to explore types and results of child‐led participatory practices. A scoping review was carried out to find out what evidence is available on child‐led participatory experiences. Based on 674 identified papers, a total of 33 studies met the inclusion criterion. The qualitative analysis employed in this review allowed us to explore the depth and themes of these experiences. The results obtained showed that the experiences analysed differed in (a) the research design and data collection methods of the studies, (b) the age of the participating children, (c) countries in which the experiences took place, (d) specific topics, and (e) outcomes. Moreover, they all shared a non‐adult‐centric view of children’s capacities for transformative action. The review has contributed to improving our understanding of children’s transformative capacities based on the possibilities offered by adults when they adopt a child‐rights approach and integrate co‐participatory approaches, encouraging us to rethink childhood from other cultural codes inspired by equality, recognition, and agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Tania Mateos-Blanco & Encarnación Sánchez‐Lissen & Inés Gil‐Jaurena & Clara Romero‐Pérez, 2022. "Child‐Led Participation: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 32-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v10:y:2022:i:2:p:32-42
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v10i2.4921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4921
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v10i2.4921?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v10:y:2022:i:2:p:32-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.