IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v340y2024ics0277953623008274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The words we die by

Author

Listed:
  • Menchik, Daniel A.
  • Giaquinta, Maya

Abstract

Hospice is a venue organized to provide a “good death” for patients and family. Since many hospice patients are bedridden and often incoherent or unconscious, many of this venue's interactions take place between hospice professionals and patients' families. The families of patients desire definitive prognoses because knowing what to expect can help them decide how to act, but for professionals such knowledge is characterized by doubt. In light of their needs, how then do hospice professionals use language to achieve and maintain the family's buy-in? Drawing on eight months of observation in Hospice House Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meetings, we analyze the verbal interactions between hospice professionals and patients' families, focusing in particular on registers of prognosis, to better understand how hospice professionals use language to manage family expectations. In order to accomplish this goal central to their occupational project, hospice professionals use future grammars, primarily comprising predictive and subjunctive verbs. Imperative verbs are rarely used. We refine the enactive perspective on authoritativeness by identifying some linguistic components that mediate authority's efficacy in a venue where emotion management is central to professional work. Paying attention to the uses of these linguistic registers helps us further understand some everyday ways that death is organized, and in general, may offer a richer understanding of death itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Menchik, Daniel A. & Giaquinta, Maya, 2024. "The words we die by," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:340:y:2024:i:c:s0277953623008274
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623008274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vinson, Alexandra H. & Underman, Kelly, 2020. "Clinical empathy as emotional labor in medical work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    2. Mrig, Emily Hammad & Spencer, Karen Lutfey, 2018. "Political economy of hope as a cultural facet of biomedicalization: A qualitative examination of constraints to hospice utilization among U.S. end-stage cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 107-113.
    3. Kellehear, Allan, 1984. "Are we a 'death-denying' society? A sociological review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 713-721, January.
    4. Timmermans, Stefan & Stivers, Tanya, 2018. "Clinical forecasting: Towards a sociology of prognosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 13-20.
    5. McNamara, Beverley & Waddell, Charles & Colvin, Margaret, 1994. "The institutionalization of the good death," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1501-1508, December.
    6. Daniel A. Menchik, 2019. "Tethered Venues: Discerning Distant Influences on a Field Site," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(4), pages 850-876, November.
    7. Zimmermann, Camilla, 2012. "Acceptance of dying: A discourse analysis of palliative care literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 217-224.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lang, Alexander & Frankus, Elisabeth & Heimerl, Katharina, 2022. "The perspective of professional caregivers working in generalist palliative care on ‘good dying’: An integrative review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Zimmermann, Camilla, 2012. "Acceptance of dying: A discourse analysis of palliative care literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 217-224.
    3. Hauge, Amalie M., 2020. "One last round of chemo? Insights from conversations between oncologists and lung cancer patients about prognosis and treatment decisions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Rodriquez, Jason, 2023. "Reconfiguring the social organization of work in the intensive care unit: Changed relationships and new roles during COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    5. Tate, Alexandra, 2020. "Invoking death: How oncologists discuss a deadly outcome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Dumas, Jean-Malik, 2016. "Essays in behavioral strategy," Other publications TiSEM a04c1b1b-eeed-48ad-894b-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Ana Patrícia Hilário & Fábio Rafael Augusto, 2022. "Pathways for a ‘Good Death’: Understanding End-of-Life Practices Through An Ethnographic Study in Two Portuguese Palliative Care Units," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(2), pages 219-235, June.
    8. Gutin, Iliya, 2022. "Not ‘putting a name to it’: Managing uncertainty in the diagnosis of childhood obesity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    9. Armstrong, David, 2019. "Diagnosis: From classification to prediction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Borgstrom, Erica & Walter, Tony, 2015. "Choice and compassion at the end of life: A critical analysis of recent English policy discourse," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 99-105.
    11. Paulus, Trena M. & Grubbs, Heather & Rice-Moran, Renee & Lester, Jessica N., 2023. "How student healthcare providers in a communication skills course respond to standardized patient resistance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    12. Olson, Rebecca Eileen, 2011. "Managing hope, denial or temporal anomie? Informal cancer carers' accounts of spouses' cancer diagnoses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 904-911, September.
    13. Marjorie Dobratz, 2004. "A Comparative Study of Variables That Have an Impact on Noncancer End-of-Life Diagnoses," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 13(4), pages 309-325, November.
    14. Cohen, Joachim & Marcoux, Isabelle & Bilsen, Johan & Deboosere, Patrick & van der Wal, Gerrit & Deliens, Luc, 2006. "European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 743-756, August.
    15. Jenkins, Tania M., 2023. "Physicians as shock absorbers: The system of structural factors driving burnout and dissatisfaction in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    16. Menon, Alka V. & Sariego, Chloe, 2022. "Engendering connection: The embodied emotional labor of U.S. cosmetic surgeons," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    17. Gott, M. & Small, Neil & Barnes, Sarah & Payne, Sheila & Seamark, David, 2008. "Older people's views of a good death in heart failure: Implications for palliative care provision," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1113-1121, October.
    18. Iddo Tavory, 2019. "Beyond the Calculus of Power and Position: Relationships and Theorizing in Ethnography," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(4), pages 727-738, November.
    19. Tate, Alexandra, 2022. "Death and the treatment imperative: Decision-making in late-stage cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    20. Lang, Alexander, 2020. "The good death and the institutionalisation of dying: An interpretive analysis of the Austrian discourse," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:340:y:2024:i:c:s0277953623008274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.