IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v306y2022ics0277953622003987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engendering connection: The embodied emotional labor of U.S. cosmetic surgeons

Author

Listed:
  • Menon, Alka V.
  • Sariego, Chloe

Abstract

Emotional labor has typically been analyzed as a gendered phenomenon in managed workers like nurses. Broadening this frame, this study analyzes how a different strata of workers perform emotional labor: surgeons. Drawing on 42 in-depth interviews with U.S. cosmetic surgeons and a content analysis of online reviews by patients, we argue that cosmetic surgeons perform both intimate and professionalized strategies of emotional labor to build long-term relationships with patients. We highlight how some surgeons strategically use their gender and bodies to forge emotional connections with patients, combining physician authority and their own embodied experiences. We identify two intimate, embodied strategies of emotional labor used by cosmetic surgeons (Paternalistic and Empathic) which are highly gendered and two additional strategies that more closely resemble professional norms (Egalitarian and Technical). Cosmetic surgeons can and do switch between strategies, subject to the constraints of gender norms and expectations; embodied strategies have different payoffs for men and women. Women surgeons, in particular, may sometimes adopt professionalized strategies of emotional labor to assert their physician authority and status and resist expectations of feminized emotional labor. In commercialized medicine, emotional labor enables elite healthcare providers to negotiate power dynamics with dependent patients. In addition to making patients feel better, embodied labor can confer meaning on surgeons’ work.

Suggested Citation

  • Menon, Alka V. & Sariego, Chloe, 2022. "Engendering connection: The embodied emotional labor of U.S. cosmetic surgeons," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:306:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622003987
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622003987
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Glinsner & Birgit Sauer & Myriam Gaitsch & Otto Penz & Johanna Hofbauer, 2019. "Doing gender in public services: Affective labour of employment agents," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 983-999, July.
    2. Wallace, Jean Elizabeth & Lemaire, Jane, 2007. "On physician well being--You'll get by with a little help from your friends," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 2565-2577, June.
    3. Julia Coffey & David Farrugia & Lisa Adkins & Steven Threadgold, 2018. "Gender, Sexuality, and Risk in the Practice of Affective Labour for Young Women in Bar Work," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(4), pages 728-743, December.
    4. Vinson, Alexandra H. & Underman, Kelly, 2020. "Clinical empathy as emotional labor in medical work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. Underman, Kelly & Hirshfield, Laura E., 2016. "Detached concern?: Emotional socialization in twenty-first century medical education," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 94-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jenkins, Tania M., 2023. "Physicians as shock absorbers: The system of structural factors driving burnout and dissatisfaction in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    2. Rodriquez, Jason, 2023. "Reconfiguring the social organization of work in the intensive care unit: Changed relationships and new roles during COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    3. Megan Sharp & David Farrugia & Julia Coffey & Steven Threadgold & Lisa Adkins & Rosalind Gill, 2022. "Queer subjectivities in hospitality labor," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1511-1525, September.
    4. Einat Lavee & Amit Kaplan, 2022. "Invisible work at work and the reproduction of gendered social service organizations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1463-1480, September.
    5. Julia Coffey & David Farrugia & Rosalind Gill & Steven Threadgold & Megan Sharp & Lisa Adkins, 2023. "Femininity work: The gendered politics of women managing violence in bar work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 1694-1708, September.
    6. Grace, Matthew K. & VanHeuvelen, Jane S., 2019. "Occupational variation in burnout among medical staff: Evidence for the stress of higher status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 199-208.
    7. Paulus, Trena M. & Grubbs, Heather & Rice-Moran, Renee & Lester, Jessica N., 2023. "How student healthcare providers in a communication skills course respond to standardized patient resistance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    8. Kroll, Camille & Murphy, Julia & Poston, Lindsay & You, Whitney & Premkumar, Ashish, 2022. "Cultivating the ideal obstetrical patient: How physicians-in-training describe pain associated with childbirth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    9. Dumbili, Emeka W., 2022. "Doing gender, doing alcohol: The paradox of gendered drinking practices among young Nigerians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    10. Aaron Baugh & Reginald F. Baugh, 2020. "Assessment of Diversity Outcomes in American Medical School Admissions: Applying the Grutter Legitimacy Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Alicja Domagała & Małgorzata M. Bała & Dawid Storman & Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez & Mateusz J. Świerz & Mateusz Kaczmarczyk & Monika Storman, 2018. "Factors Associated with Satisfaction of Hospital Physicians: A Systematic Review on European Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Broom, Alex & Kirby, Emma & Good, Phillip & Wootton, Julia & Adams, Jon, 2013. "The art of letting go: Referral to palliative care and its discontents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 9-16.
    13. Grace, Matthew K., 2017. "Subjective social status and premedical students' attitudes towards medical school," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 84-98.
    14. Goranson, Amelia & Sheeran, Paschal & Katz, Julia & Gray, Kurt, 2020. "Doctors are seen as Godlike: Moral typecasting in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    15. Cabaniss, Peyton, 2023. "Medical education experiences among medical students with chronic health conditions: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    16. Menchik, Daniel A. & Giaquinta, Maya, 2024. "The words we die by," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    17. Crowe, Sophie & Brugha, Ruairi, 2018. "“We've all had patients who've died …”: Narratives of emotion and ideals of competence among junior doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 152-159.
    18. Vinson, Alexandra H. & Underman, Kelly, 2020. "Clinical empathy as emotional labor in medical work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    19. Tove Lundberg & Stina Melander, 2021. "Professional Coping Strategies in a Temporal Perspective: A Pilot Study on How Swedish General Practitioners Deal With Challenges Inherent in Pain Management," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    20. Carminati, Lara, 2020. "Behavioural Economics and Human Decision Making: Instances from the Health Care System," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(6), pages 659-664.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:306:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622003987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.