IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v13y2004i4p309-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Variables That Have an Impact on Noncancer End-of-Life Diagnoses

Author

Listed:
  • Marjorie Dobratz

    (University of Washington–Tacoma)

Abstract

By way of analysis of variance, this secondary analysis compared three groups of noncancer home hospice patients (AIDS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [ALS],and other) for psychological correlates of adaptation and well-being, pain, and physical function, as measured by the Life Closure Scale (LCS), the Affect Balance Scale, the McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire Part I, and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. The sample included 10 AIDS patients (Group 1), 6 ALS patients (Group 2), and 5 patients with other noncancer, end-stage diseases (Group 3). A significant difference was found between Group 2 (ALS) and Group 3 (other) on the LCS, F(2, 18) = 4.3, p = .03. Scheffe and Duncan range post hoc tests and at test at the p≤.05 level (t9 = 4.1, p = .003) confirmed the finding. No significant group differences were found among the ALS, AIDS, and other groups in measures of psychological well-being, pain, and physical function.

Suggested Citation

  • Marjorie Dobratz, 2004. "A Comparative Study of Variables That Have an Impact on Noncancer End-of-Life Diagnoses," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 13(4), pages 309-325, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:13:y:2004:i:4:p:309-325
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773804267730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773804267730
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773804267730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chochinov, Harvey Max & Hack, Thomas & McClement, Susan & Kristjanson, Linda & Harlos, Mike, 2002. "Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 433-443, February.
    2. Pakenham, Kenneth I. & Dadds, Mark R. & Terry, Deborah J., 1996. "Adaptive demands along the HIV disease continuum," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 245-256, January.
    3. McNamara, Beverley & Waddell, Charles & Colvin, Margaret, 1994. "The institutionalization of the good death," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1501-1508, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Ferretti & Andrea Pozza & Maurilio Pallassini & Lorenzo Righi & Fulvia Marini & Sabrina Adami & Anna Coluccia, 2019. "Gender invariance of dignity in non-terminal elderly patients with chronic diseases: a multicentric study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1645-1656, May.
    2. Lang, Alexander & Frankus, Elisabeth & Heimerl, Katharina, 2022. "The perspective of professional caregivers working in generalist palliative care on ‘good dying’: An integrative review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    3. Ana Patrícia Hilário & Fábio Rafael Augusto, 2022. "Pathways for a ‘Good Death’: Understanding End-of-Life Practices Through An Ethnographic Study in Two Portuguese Palliative Care Units," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(2), pages 219-235, June.
    4. Bridget Johnston & Philip Larkin & Michael Connolly & Catriona Barry & Melanie Narayanasamy & Ulrika Östlund & Sonja McIlfatrick, 2015. "Dignity‐conserving care in palliative care settings: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1743-1772, July.
    5. Street, Annette F. & Love, Anthony, 2005. "Dimensions of privacy in palliative care: views of health professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(8), pages 1795-1804, April.
    6. Cohen, Joachim & Marcoux, Isabelle & Bilsen, Johan & Deboosere, Patrick & van der Wal, Gerrit & Deliens, Luc, 2006. "European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 743-756, August.
    7. Yunxiang Huang & Dan Luo & Xi Chen & Dexing Zhang & Zhulin Huang & Shuiyuan Xiao, 2020. "HIV-Related Stress Experienced by Newly Diagnosed People Living with HIV in China: A 1-Year Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Zimmermann, Camilla, 2012. "Acceptance of dying: A discourse analysis of palliative care literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 217-224.
    9. Gott, M. & Small, Neil & Barnes, Sarah & Payne, Sheila & Seamark, David, 2008. "Older people's views of a good death in heart failure: Implications for palliative care provision," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1113-1121, October.
    10. Broom, Alex & Cavenagh, John, 2010. "Masculinity, moralities and being cared for: An exploration of experiences of living and dying in a hospice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 869-876, September.
    11. McPherson, Christine J. & Wilson, Keith G. & Murray, Mary Ann, 2007. "Feeling like a burden: Exploring the perspectives of patients at the end of life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 417-427, January.
    12. Menchik, Daniel A. & Giaquinta, Maya, 2024. "The words we die by," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    13. Carlos Laranjeira & Marília Dourado, 2022. "“Dignity as a Small Candle Flame That Doesn’t Go Out!”: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study with Patients Living with Advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Jacobson, Nora, 2007. "Dignity and health: A review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 292-302, January.
    15. Tang, Siew Tzuh & Liu, Tsang-Wu & Lai, Mei-Shu & McCorkle, Ruth, 2005. "Discrepancy in the preferences of place of death between terminally ill cancer patients and their primary family caregivers in Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1560-1566, October.
    16. Sonja McIlfatrick & Michael Connolly & Rita Collins & Tara Murphy & Bridget Johnston & Philip Larkin, 2017. "Evaluating a dignity care intervention for palliative care in the community setting: community nurses’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4300-4312, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:13:y:2004:i:4:p:309-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.