IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v39y1994i11p1501-1508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The institutionalization of the good death

Author

Listed:
  • McNamara, Beverley
  • Waddell, Charles
  • Colvin, Margaret

Abstract

There has been some recent concern in Britain and North America that the increasing institutionalization of hospice care may compromise the movement's founding ideals. The threats posed by the encroachment of mainstream medicine and the medical technological imperative to treat, are also a source of concern to hospice administrators and staff. This study uses Australian data based on interviews with nurses and participant observation in an in-patient hospice unit and a community based hospice service to investigate whether the Good Death ideal, as central to the hospice philosophy, is compatible with the institutionalization of hospice care. The issues that arise, although interrelated are conceptualized as the following five challenges to hospice care: (1) encroachment of mainstream medicine and the medical technical imperative; (2) competing motivations; (3) delimitation of intellectual structures; (4) organizational maintenance; and (5) routinization of the Good Death. This conceptual framework is based on the way in which nurses and other health care professionals have used shared logic and strategies to negotiate the daily demands of their work and illustrates the tension that arises between the maintenance of the ideal and the maintenance of the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • McNamara, Beverley & Waddell, Charles & Colvin, Margaret, 1994. "The institutionalization of the good death," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1501-1508, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:11:p:1501-1508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90002-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gott, M. & Small, Neil & Barnes, Sarah & Payne, Sheila & Seamark, David, 2008. "Older people's views of a good death in heart failure: Implications for palliative care provision," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1113-1121, October.
    2. Lang, Alexander & Frankus, Elisabeth & Heimerl, Katharina, 2022. "The perspective of professional caregivers working in generalist palliative care on ‘good dying’: An integrative review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    3. Ana Patrícia Hilário & Fábio Rafael Augusto, 2022. "Pathways for a ‘Good Death’: Understanding End-of-Life Practices Through An Ethnographic Study in Two Portuguese Palliative Care Units," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(2), pages 219-235, June.
    4. Marjorie Dobratz, 2004. "A Comparative Study of Variables That Have an Impact on Noncancer End-of-Life Diagnoses," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 13(4), pages 309-325, November.
    5. Cohen, Joachim & Marcoux, Isabelle & Bilsen, Johan & Deboosere, Patrick & van der Wal, Gerrit & Deliens, Luc, 2006. "European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 743-756, August.
    6. Zimmermann, Camilla, 2012. "Acceptance of dying: A discourse analysis of palliative care literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 217-224.
    7. Menchik, Daniel A. & Giaquinta, Maya, 2024. "The words we die by," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    8. Broom, Alex & Cavenagh, John, 2010. "Masculinity, moralities and being cared for: An exploration of experiences of living and dying in a hospice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 869-876, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:11:p:1501-1508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.