IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v315y2022ics0277953622008279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responsive social support serves important functions in clinical communication: Translating perspectives from relationship science to improve cancer clinical interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Dwyer, Laura A.
  • Epstein, Ronald M.
  • Feeney, Brooke C.
  • Blair, Irene V.
  • Bolger, Niall
  • Ferrer, Rebecca A.

Abstract

Patient-clinician interactions are critical to patient-centered care, including in cancer care contexts which are often defined by multiple patient-clinician interactions over an extended period. Research on these dyadic interactions has been guided by perspectives in clinical communication science, but the study of clinical communication has not been fully integrated with perspectives on interpersonal interactions from relationship science research. An overlapping concept in both fields is the concept of responsive socialsupport. In this article, we discuss responsiveness as a concept that offers opportunities for connections between these two disciplines. Next, we focus on how relationship science can be applied to research in clinical settings. We discuss how three areas of relationship science define responsiveness and have potential for extension to clinical communication: (1) (in)visibility of social support, (2) attachment orientations, and (3) shared meaning systems. We also discuss how social biases can impede responsiveness and suggest research avenues to develop ideas and understand potential challenges in connecting these two fields. Many opportunities exist for interdisciplinary theory development that can generate momentum in understanding interpersonal processes in cancer care.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwyer, Laura A. & Epstein, Ronald M. & Feeney, Brooke C. & Blair, Irene V. & Bolger, Niall & Ferrer, Rebecca A., 2022. "Responsive social support serves important functions in clinical communication: Translating perspectives from relationship science to improve cancer clinical interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:315:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622008279
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622008279
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maunder, Robert G. & Panzer, Annie & Viljoen, Margaretha & Owen, Johanna & Human, Schalk & Hunter, Jonathan J., 2006. "Physicians' difficulty with emergency department patients is related to patients' attachment style," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 552-562, July.
    2. Blair, I.V. & Havranek, E.P. & Price, D.W. & Hanratty, R. & Fairclough, D.L. & Farley, T. & Hirsh, H.K. & Steiner, J.F., 2013. "Assessment of biases against latinos and african americans among primary care providers and community members," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(1), pages 92-98.
    3. Ralph D. Stacey, 1995. "The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(6), pages 477-495.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Priyanga Gunarathne & Huaxia Rui & Abraham Seidmann, 2022. "Racial Bias in Customer Service: Evidence from Twitter," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 43-54, March.
    2. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    4. Marta Cecilia Jaramillo-Mejía & Dov Chernichovsky, 2015. "Información para la calidad del sistema de salud en Colombia: una propuesta de revisión basada en el modelo israelí," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, January.
    5. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Salvador, Antonio & Knipe, Dar & Kendall, Elaine, 2002. "Structural Change Or Logical Incrementalism? Turbulence In The Global Meat System," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19704, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Faggini, Marisa & Parziale, Anna, 2011. "Fitness landscape and tax planning: NK model for fiscal federalism," MPRA Paper 33770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Mary Uhl‐Bien, 2021. "Complexity and COVID‐19: Leadership and Followership in a Complex World," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1400-1404, July.
    8. Tan, Justin, 2007. "Phase transitions and emergence of entrepreneurship: The transformation of Chinese SOEs over time," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 77-96, January.
    9. Hu, Shan & Yu, Yongze & Fei, Qingyu, 2023. "Social credit and patent quality: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Haina Zhang, 2017. "Complexity absorption: a processual strategic approach to corporate entrepreneurship strategy," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Roger B Mason, 2014. "Marketing Communications and Environmental Turbulence: A Complexity Theory View," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(4), pages 279-290.
    12. Meike Nicole Schulte & Cody Morris Paris, 2024. "Working the system—An empirical analysis of the relationship between systems thinking, paradoxical cognition, and sustainability practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4154-4171, September.
    13. Da Mota de Pina E Cunha, A.M. & Verhallen, T.M.M., 1998. "Organizational innovation : An overview of topics, models and research directions," Other publications TiSEM 03119425-3fea-4334-ad00-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Mats Forsgren & Ulf Holm, 2022. "Controlling without owning – owning without controlling: A critical note on two extensions of internalization theory," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(8), pages 1734-1746, October.
    15. R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey G. Covin & Donald F. Kuratko, 2009. "Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-46, January.
    16. Rhisiart, Martin & Störmer, Eckhard & Daheim, Cornelia, 2017. "From foresight to impact? The 2030 Future of Work scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 203-213.
    17. Jae-Yeoup Kim & Jang-Ho Choi, 2022. "The Impact of Adaptation-Oriented HRM on Exploration: Mediating Effects of Self-Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3109 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Benoit Morel & Rangaraj Ramanujam, 1999. "Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: The Dynamics of Organizations as Adaptive and Evolving Systems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 278-293, June.
    20. Mary Han & Bill McKelvey, 2016. "How to Grow Successful Social Entrepreneurship Firms? Key Ideas from Complexity Theory," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 243-280, September.
    21. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Kane, Samuel, 2002. "The Farm Business Environment and New Generation Cooperatives as an Innovation Strategy," 2002 Annual Meeting, November 13 31826, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:315:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622008279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.