IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2012.300812_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of biases against latinos and african americans among primary care providers and community members

Author

Listed:
  • Blair, I.V.
  • Havranek, E.P.
  • Price, D.W.
  • Hanratty, R.
  • Fairclough, D.L.
  • Farley, T.
  • Hirsh, H.K.
  • Steiner, J.F.

Abstract

Objectives. We assessed implicit and explicit bias against both Latinos and African Americans among experienced primary care providers (PCPs) and community members (CMs) in the same geographic area. Methods. Two hundred ten PCPs and 190 CMs from 3 health care organizations in the Denver, Colorado, metropolitan area completed Implicit Association Tests and self-report measures of implicit and explicit bias, respectively. Results. With a 60% participation rate, the PCPs demonstrated substantial implicit bias against both Latinos and African Americans, but this was no different from CMs. Explicit bias was largely absent in both groups. Adjustment for background characteristics showed the PCPs had slightly weaker ethnic/racial bias than CMs. Conclusions. This research provided the first evidence of implicit bias against Latinos in health care, as well as confirming previous findings of implicit bias against African Americans. Lack of substantive differences in bias between the experienced PCPs and CMs suggested a wider societal problem. At the same time, the wide range of implicit bias suggested that bias in health care is neither uniform nor inevitable, and important lessons might be learned from providers who do not exhibit bias. Copyright © 2012 by the American Public Health Association®.

Suggested Citation

  • Blair, I.V. & Havranek, E.P. & Price, D.W. & Hanratty, R. & Fairclough, D.L. & Farley, T. & Hirsh, H.K. & Steiner, J.F., 2013. "Assessment of biases against latinos and african americans among primary care providers and community members," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(1), pages 92-98.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300812_3
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300812
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Priyanga Gunarathne & Huaxia Rui & Abraham Seidmann, 2022. "Racial Bias in Customer Service: Evidence from Twitter," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 43-54, March.
    2. Ursula Meidert & Godela Dönnges & Thomas Bucher & Frank Wieber & Andreas Gerber-Grote, 2023. "Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Mindlis, Irina & Livert, David & Federman, Alex D. & Wisnivesky, Juan P. & Revenson, Tracey A., 2020. "Racial/ethnic concordance between patients and researchers as a predictor of study attrition," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Dwyer, Laura A. & Epstein, Ronald M. & Feeney, Brooke C. & Blair, Irene V. & Bolger, Niall & Ferrer, Rebecca A., 2022. "Responsive social support serves important functions in clinical communication: Translating perspectives from relationship science to improve cancer clinical interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    5. Maina, Ivy W. & Belton, Tanisha D. & Ginzberg, Sara & Singh, Ajit & Johnson, Tiffani J., 2018. "A decade of studying implicit racial/ethnic bias in healthcare providers using the implicit association test," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 219-229.
    6. Carter, Jarvis W. & Salabarría-Peña, Yamir & Fields, Errol L. & Robinson, William T., 2022. "Evaluating for health equity among a cluster of health departments implementing PrEP services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2012.300812_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.