IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v63y2006i2p552-562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physicians' difficulty with emergency department patients is related to patients' attachment style

Author

Listed:
  • Maunder, Robert G.
  • Panzer, Annie
  • Viljoen, Margaretha
  • Owen, Johanna
  • Human, Schalk
  • Hunter, Jonathan J.

Abstract

Doctors experience 10-20 percent of patient interactions as being personally difficult, but the sources of difficulty are incompletely understood. In particular, physician-perceived difficulty has not been studied from the perspective of an established model of interpersonal relationships. Our objective was to determine whether a relationship exists between patients' attachment style and the degree of difficulty experienced by their attending physician in an Emergency Department in Pretoria, South Africa. Patients of an Emergency Department (n=165) completed the Experiences in Close Relationships--Revised Questionnaire to measure attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance. Their physicians (n=26), blind to the attachment measure, rated perceived difficulty using the Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire. Four categories of attachment style were identified by cluster analysis of attachment scores. Patients were divided into difficult and non-difficult groups using a cut-off score. Two percent of patients with a secure attachment style were experienced as difficult, whereas the prevalence of difficulty in the insecure styles was 'preoccupied' 17 percent, 'dismissing' 19 percent and 'fearful' 39 percent ([chi]2=16.383, df=3, p=0.0009), supporting the hypothesis that the physician's perception of patient difficulty is related to the patient's attachment style. The degree to which physicians serve attachment functions for patients in crisis merits further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Maunder, Robert G. & Panzer, Annie & Viljoen, Margaretha & Owen, Johanna & Human, Schalk & Hunter, Jonathan J., 2006. "Physicians' difficulty with emergency department patients is related to patients' attachment style," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 552-562, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:63:y:2006:i:2:p:552-562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(06)00003-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andersen, Tonny Elmose, 2012. "Does attachment insecurity affect the outcomes of a multidisciplinary pain management program? The association between attachment insecurity, pain, disability, distress, and the use of opioids," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(9), pages 1461-1468.
    2. Dwyer, Laura A. & Epstein, Ronald M. & Feeney, Brooke C. & Blair, Irene V. & Bolger, Niall & Ferrer, Rebecca A., 2022. "Responsive social support serves important functions in clinical communication: Translating perspectives from relationship science to improve cancer clinical interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    3. Bartley, Mel & Head, Jenny & Stansfeld, Stephen, 2007. "Is attachment style a source of resilience against health inequalities at work?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 765-775, February.
    4. Christina Maar Andersen & Anette Fischer Pedersen & Anders Helles Carlsen & Frede Olesen & Peter Vedsted, 2017. "Data quality and factor analysis of the Danish version of the Relationship Scale Questionnaire," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:63:y:2006:i:2:p:552-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.