IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v310y2022ics0277953622005767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online student culture as site for negotiating assessment in medical education

Author

Listed:
  • Underman, Kelly
  • Kochunilathil, Merlin
  • McLean, Lauren
  • Vinson, Alexandra H.

Abstract

Classic studies of medical education have examined how professional socialization reproduces the prevailing professional culture, as well as how students actively negotiate their place in educational processes. However, sociological research has not re-examined student culture in light of structural transformations in medical education, such as the introduction of new assessment types and their use as modes of commensuration. In this paper, we examine data from two studies of online forums where medical trainees and applicants to medical school discuss their experiences preparing for tests of professional skills, including judgment, empathy, and communication. Examining how medical students talk about these tests on such forums allows us to understand the meaning-making processes at work as students negotiate the commensuration processes such tests enable. We examine how these negotiations take place in online forums, where participants confront common challenges, form common perspectives, and share common solutions, all hallmarks of student culture. Through qualitative analysis, we find that online communities are spaces where students grapple with these new forms of commensuration, interrogate the standards and quantifications that underlie them, and collectively negotiate how to approach these assessments. Using the case of online forum communities, our findings advance past work on student culture in medical sociology by theorizing student culture as an extra-organizational phenomenon that spans multiple career stages. In so doing, we highlight the importance of online forum data for studying social processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Underman, Kelly & Kochunilathil, Merlin & McLean, Lauren & Vinson, Alexandra H., 2022. "Online student culture as site for negotiating assessment in medical education," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:310:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622005767
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622005767
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Katherine Y. & Anspach, Renee R. & Crawford, Brett & Parnami, Sonali & Fuhrel-Forbis, Andrea & De Vries, Raymond G., 2014. "What must I do to succeed?: Narratives from the US premedical experience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 98-105.
    2. Vinson, Alexandra H. & Underman, Kelly, 2020. "Clinical empathy as emotional labor in medical work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franklyn, Grace, 2023. "“We're IMGs, and we're often seen as human garbage outside of primary care”: A qualitative investigation of dynamic status hierarchy construction online by medical trainees," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulus, Trena M. & Grubbs, Heather & Rice-Moran, Renee & Lester, Jessica N., 2023. "How student healthcare providers in a communication skills course respond to standardized patient resistance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    2. Jenkins, Tania M., 2023. "Physicians as shock absorbers: The system of structural factors driving burnout and dissatisfaction in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    3. Rodriquez, Jason, 2023. "Reconfiguring the social organization of work in the intensive care unit: Changed relationships and new roles during COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    4. Leigh, Jenny K., 2021. "“What are you signing up for?”: Pre-medical students' perception of physicians' risk and responsibility during COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    5. Grace, Matthew K., 2018. "Friend or frenemy? Experiential homophily and educational track attrition among premedical students," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 33-42.
    6. Grace, Matthew K., 2019. "Parting ways: Sex-based differences in premedical attrition," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 222-233.
    7. Menon, Alka V. & Sariego, Chloe, 2022. "Engendering connection: The embodied emotional labor of U.S. cosmetic surgeons," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    8. Grace, Matthew K., 2017. "Subjective social status and premedical students' attitudes towards medical school," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 84-98.
    9. Cabaniss, Peyton, 2023. "Medical education experiences among medical students with chronic health conditions: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    10. Menchik, Daniel A. & Giaquinta, Maya, 2024. "The words we die by," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:310:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622005767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.