IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v232y2019icp50-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research ethics for mobile sensing device use by vulnerable populations

Author

Listed:
  • Breslin, Samantha
  • Shareck, Martine
  • Fuller, Daniel

Abstract

Devices equipped with sensors to track mobility, such as through Global Position Systems (GPS) and accelerometery, are increasingly being used for research. Following Canadian, US, and International guidelines there is a need to give special consideration when conducting research with vulnerable populations. This paper examines specific ethical concerns for conducting research with mobile sensing devices for use by vulnerable populations, considering aspects of both research design and research process. Drawing on insights from feminist design and aligned fields, such as participatory design and action research, we contend that any research design and process for working with vulnerable populations must be developed in collaboration with the particular groups and communities who are part of the research. As part of this process of collaborative research, we discuss risks in terms of the lack of control over data associated with choosing commercial devices, as well as practicality and obtrusiveness of devices for the wearer. We also discuss the significance of informed consent and refusal and issues relating to security and safety during research. As part of the collaborative research design and process, we argue that participants should be given as much control over their data as possible. Based on this discussion, we provide recommendations for researchers to consider, which are broadly relevant for research using mobile sensing devices but particularly significant in relation to vulnerable populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Breslin, Samantha & Shareck, Martine & Fuller, Daniel, 2019. "Research ethics for mobile sensing device use by vulnerable populations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 50-57.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:232:y:2019:i:c:p:50-57
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619302357
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haley, Danielle F. & Matthews, Stephen A. & Cooper, Hannah L.F. & Haardörfer, Regine & Adimora, Adaora A. & Wingood, Gina M. & Kramer, Michael R., 2016. "Confidentiality considerations for use of social-spatial data on the social determinants of health: Sexual and reproductive health case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 49-56.
    2. Frohlich, K.L. & Potvin, L., 2008. "Transcending the known in public health practice: The inequality paradox: The population approach and vulnerable populations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 216-221.
    3. Fuller, Daniel & Shareck, Martine & Stanley, Kevin, 2017. "Ethical implications of location and accelerometer measurement in health research studies with mobile sensing devices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 84-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Cave & Ryngan Pyper & Birgitte Fischer-Bonde & Sarah Humboldt-Dachroeden & Piedad Martin-Olmedo, 2021. "Lessons from an International Initiative to Set and Share Good Practice on Human Health in Environmental Impact Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Vander Ploeg, Kerry A. & Maximova, Katerina & McGavock, Jonathan & Davis, Wendy & Veugelers, Paul, 2014. "Do school-based physical activity interventions increase or reduce inequalities in health?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 80-87.
    3. Wolfgang A. Markham & Alan Dolan & Graham F. Moore, 2021. "A Sociological Framework to Reduce Aberrant Behaviour of School Students Through Increasing School Connectedness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    4. Gesa Lehne & Claudia Voelcker-Rehage & Jochen Meyer & Karin Bammann & Dirk Gansefort & Tanja Brüchert & Gabriele Bolte, 2019. "Equity Impact Assessment of Interventions to Promote Physical Activity among Older Adults: A Logic Model Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Nicole Darmon & Adam Drewnowski, 2015. "Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis," Post-Print hal-01774670, HAL.
    6. Gagnon-Dufresne, Marie-Catherine & Gautier, Lara & Beaujoin, Camille & Boivin, Pauline & Coulibaly, Abdourahmane & Richard, Zoé & Gomes de Medeiros, Stéphanie & Dutra Da Nóbrega, Raylson Emanuel & de , 2023. "Did the design and planning of testing and contact tracing interventions for COVID-19 consider social inequalities in health? A multiple case study from Brazil, Canada, France & Mali," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    7. Gesa Czwikla & Filip Boen & Derek G. Cook & Johan de Jong & Tess Harris & Lisa K. Hilz & Steve Iliffe & Richard Morris & Saskia Muellmann & Denise A. Peels & Claudia R. Pischke & Benjamin Schüz & Mart, 2019. "Equity-Specific Effects of Interventions to Promote Physical Activity among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Development of a Collaborative Equity-Specific Re-Analysis Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Bernd Resch & Inga Puetz & Matthias Bluemke & Kalliopi Kyriakou & Jakob Miksch, 2020. "An Interdisciplinary Mixed-Methods Approach to Analyzing Urban Spaces: The Case of Urban Walkability and Bikeability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Rosalind Wallace & Rachel Franklin & Susan Grant-Muller & Alison Heppenstall & Victoria Houlden, 2022. "Estimating the social and spatial impacts of Covid mitigation strategies in United Kingdom regions: synthetic data and dashboards [Developing a sustainable exit strategy for COVID-19: health, econo," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(3), pages 683-702.
    10. Pedersen, Pia Vivian & Hjelmar, Ulf & Høybye, Mette Terp & Rod, Morten Hulvej, 2017. "Can inequality be tamed through boundary work? A qualitative study of health promotion aimed at reducing health inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-8.
    11. Chao, Dingding & Hashimoto, Hideki & Kondo, Naoki, 2015. "Dynamic impact of social stratification and social influence on smoking prevalence by gender: An agent-based model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 280-287.
    12. Struijs, Jeroen N. & Drewes, Hanneke W. & Heijink, Richard & Baan, Caroline A., 2015. "How to evaluate population management? Transforming the Care Continuum Alliance population health guide toward a broadly applicable analytical framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(4), pages 522-529.
    13. Goldfeld, Sharon & Downes, Marnie & Gray, Sarah & Pham, Cindy & Guo, Shuaijun & O'Connor, Elodie & Redmond, Gerry & Azpitarte, Francisco & Badland, Hannah & Woolfenden, Sue & Williams, Katrina & Pries, 2024. "Household income supplements in early childhood to reduce inequities in children's development," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    14. Hurtado, David & Kawachi, Ichiro & Sudarsky, John, 2011. "Social capital and self-rated health in Colombia: The good, the bad and the ugly," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 584-590, February.
    15. Golden, Shelley D. & Perreira, Krista M., 2015. "Losing jobs and lighting up: Employment experiences and smoking in the Great Recession," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 110-118.
    16. Rosso, Annalisa & Marzuillo, Carolina & Massimi, Azzurra & De Vito, Corrado & de Belvis, Anton Giulio & La Torre, Giuseppe & Federici, Antonio & Ricciardi, Walter & Villari, Paolo, 2015. "Policy and planning of prevention in Italy: Results from an appraisal of prevention plans developed by Regions for the period 2010–2012," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 760-769.
    17. Andrew Barnfield, 2020. "‘The Feel of the Stones, Sounds of Cars, the Different Smells’: How Incorporating the Senses Can Help Support Equitable Health Promotion," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
    18. Elaine M. Hernandez & Mike Vuolo & Laura C. Frizzell & Brian C. Kelly, 2019. "Moving Upstream: The Effect of Tobacco Clean Air Restrictions on Educational Inequalities in Smoking Among Young Adults," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(5), pages 1693-1721, October.
    19. Ruca Maass & Monica Lillefjell, 2022. "Can the Theory of Salutogenesis Offer a Framework to Enhance Policy Coherence during Policy Development and Implementation in Municipalities?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, February.
    20. Fuller, Daniel & Shareck, Martine & Stanley, Kevin, 2017. "Ethical implications of location and accelerometer measurement in health research studies with mobile sensing devices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 84-88.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:232:y:2019:i:c:p:50-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.