IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v99y2023ics0739885923000409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the attitudes and perceptions influencing user participation in gamification schemes for TDM

Author

Listed:
  • Yen, Barbara T.H.
  • Mulley, Corinne
  • Meza, Gerardo

Abstract

Travel demand management (TDM) strategies and behaviour change initiatives aim to improve travel conditions by reducing or redistribute demand where the transport system is most congested. TDM strategies with gamified design can provide positive incentives in the form of playing a game and providing rewards. Gamified design has recently been implemented for TDM strategies in the public transport field with some success. However, before implementing a TDM strategy with a gamified design, it is critical to understand how participants or users value the proposed strategy. This study explores which attitudes and perceptions make a gamified scheme successful in attracting users to participate. This study surveyed 160 participants in Taipei City and used structural equation modelling (SEM) with an extended technology acceptance model (extended TAM) to identify which user attitudes and perceptions are critical to influence respondents' intention to join the gamified scheme. This study finds the key element of ‘to capture the fun and joy’ of the gamified scheme or perceived enjoyment is positively related to perceived ease of use that is key in convincing people to participate as being perceived as easy to use means the target demographic feels no burden in “giving it a try”. The results of this study may aid policy makers in designing gamification schemes that are more tailored for the specific purpose and thus more effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Yen, Barbara T.H. & Mulley, Corinne & Meza, Gerardo, 2023. "Exploring the attitudes and perceptions influencing user participation in gamification schemes for TDM," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:99:y:2023:i:c:s0739885923000409
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885923000409
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    2. Zhang, Zheng & Fujii, Hidemichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2014. "How does Commuting Behavior Change Due to Incentives? An Empirical Study of the Beijing Subway System," MPRA Paper 54691, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Verena Berger & Ulf Schrader, 2016. "Fostering Sustainable Nutrition Behavior through Gamification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Ivan K. W. Lai & Yide Liu & Xinbo Sun & Hao Zhang & Weiwei Xu, 2015. "Factors Influencing the Behavioural Intention towards Full Electric Vehicles: An Empirical Study in Macau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Astrid Dickinger & Mitra Arami & David Meyer, 2008. "The role of perceived enjoyment and social norm in the adoption of technology with network externalities," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 4-11, February.
    6. Changjun Lee & Kyoungsun Lee & Daeho Lee, 2017. "Mobile Healthcare Applications and Gamification for Sustained Health Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-12, May.
    7. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    8. Lu, Irene R.R. & Kwan, Ernest & Thomas, D. Roland & Cedzynski, Marzena, 2011. "Two new methods for estimating structural equation models: An illustration and a comparison with two established methods," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 258-268.
    9. Romain Petiot, 2004. "Parking enforcement and travel demand management," Post-Print hal-02422664, HAL.
    10. Ben-Elia, Eran & Ettema, Dick, 2011. "Rewarding rush-hour avoidance: A study of commuters' travel behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 567-582, August.
    11. Peer, Stefanie & Knockaert, Jasper & Verhoef, Erik T., 2016. "Train commuters’ scheduling preferences: Evidence from a large-scale peak avoidance experiment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 314-333.
    12. Kitamura, Ryuichi & Fujii, Satoshi & Pas, Eric I., 1997. "Time-use data, analysis and modeling: toward the next generation of transportation planning methodologies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 225-235, October.
    13. Liang, Jyun-Kai & Eccarius, Timo & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2019. "Investigating factors that affect the intention to use shared parking: A case study of Taipei City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 799-812.
    14. Petiot, Romain, 2004. "Parking enforcement and travel demand management," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 399-411, October.
    15. Rey, David & Dixit, Vinayak V. & Ygnace, Jean-Luc & Waller, S. Travis, 2016. "An endogenous lottery-based incentive mechanism to promote off-peak usage in congested transit systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 46-55.
    16. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    17. Knockaert, Jasper & Tseng, Yin-Yen & Verhoef, Erik T. & Rouwendal, Jan, 2012. "The Spitsmijden experiment: A reward to battle congestion," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 260-272.
    18. Sebastian Bamberg & Daniel Rölle & Christoph Weber, 2003. "Does habitual car use not lead to more resistance to change of travel mode?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 97-108, February.
    19. Chidambaram, Bhuvanachithra & Janssen, Marco A. & Rommel, Jens & Zikos, Dimitrios, 2014. "Commuters’ mode choice as a coordination problem: A framed field experiment on traffic policy in Hyderabad, India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 9-22.
    20. Dong Zhang & Jan-Dirk Schmöcker & Satoshi Fujii & Xiaoguang Yang, 2016. "Social norms and public transport usage: empirical study from Shanghai," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 869-888, September.
    21. Yuh-Shihng Chang & Yu-Jhang Rick Hu & Hong-Wei Chen, 2019. "Learning Performance Assessment for Culture Environment Learning and Custom Experience with an AR Navigation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yen, Barbara T.H. & Mulley, Corinne & Meza, Gerardo, 2023. "Understanding the potential policy transfer of gamification schemes for behaviour change in public transport and road safety," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Samia Elattar & Hind Albalawi & Wafaa Saleh, 2023. "Parking Charges: Ingeniously Effective and Publicly Accepted in Riyadh?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Wang, Bing & Li, Shuai & Wang, Qi & Lin, Zhenhong, 2020. "Understanding travelers’ mobility decisions in response to customer incentives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 113-120.
    4. Najmi, Ali & Bostanara, Maryam & Gu, Ziyuan & Rashidi, Taha H., 2021. "On-street parking management and pricing policies: An evaluation from a system enhancement perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 128-151.
    5. Anupriya, & Graham, Daniel J. & Hörcher, Daniel & Anderson, Richard J. & Bansal, Prateek, 2020. "Quantifying the ex-post causal impact of differential pricing on commuter trip scheduling in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 16-34.
    6. An, Qinhe & Fu, Xiao & Huang, Di & Cheng, Qixiu & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2020. "Analysis of adding-runs strategy for peak-hour regular bus services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Ghimire, Ramesh & Lancelin, Colby, 2019. "The relationship between financial incentives provided by employers and commuters' decision to use transit: Results from the Atlanta Regional Household Travel Survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 103-113.
    8. Levy, Nadav & Klein, Ido & Ben-Elia, Eran, 2018. "Emergence of cooperation and a fair system optimum in road networks: A game-theoretic and agent-based modelling approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 46-55.
    9. Wang, Yu & Wang, Yacan & Ettema, Dick & Mao, Zidan & Charlton, Samuel G. & Zhou, Huiyu, 2020. "Commuter value perceptions in peak avoidance behavior: An empirical study in the Beijing subway system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 70-84.
    10. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Bireswar Dutta & Hsin-Ginn Hwang, 2021. "Consumers Purchase Intentions of Green Electric Vehicles: The Influence of Consumers Technological and Environmental Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Jeeyeon Jeong & Yaeri Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2021. "Do Consumers Care About Aesthetics and Compatibility? The Intention to Use Wearable Devices in Health Care," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    13. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    14. Oghuma, Apollos Patricks & Chang, Younghoon & Libaque-Saenz, Christian Fernando & Park, Myeong-Cheol & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2015. "Benefit-confirmation model for post-adoption behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: A comparative analysis of KakaoTalk and Joyn in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 658-677.
    15. Xiao Han & Yun Yu & Bin Jia & Zi‐You Gao & Rui Jiang & H. Michael Zhang, 2021. "Coordination Behavior in Mode Choice: Laboratory Study of Equilibrium Transformation and Selection," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3635-3656, October.
    16. Juan F. Tavera Mesías & Juan C. Sánchez Giraldo & Bernardo Ballesteros Díaz, 2011. "Aceptación del E-Commerce en Colombia: un estudio para la ciudad de Medellín," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    17. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Gandomi, Amir & Roorda, Matthew J., 2020. "Illegal parking and optimal enforcement policies with search friction," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Fang Zong & Meng Zeng & Ping Yu, 2024. "A parking pricing scheme considering parking dynamics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1349-1371, August.
    19. Rodier, Caroline & Shaheen, Susan A. & Blake, Tagan, 2010. "Smart Parking Pilot on the Coaster Commuter Rail Line in San Diego, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt06s723rw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    20. ADEYEYE, Gbadegesin, 2019. "http://anale.spiruharet.ro/index.php/economics/article/view/1914/pdf," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 19(1), pages 31-63.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gamification; Gamified design; Public transport; SEM; Attitudes; Perception; Travel demand management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General
    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:99:y:2023:i:c:s0739885923000409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.