IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v75y2019icp45-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of bathtub congestion with continuous scheduling preference

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Chuanyao
  • Huang, Haijun

Abstract

The bathtub model provides a vital analysis tool to capture the features of traffic jam, especially that of hypercongested traffic. For reducing the complication of analysis, previous studies adopted the constant α-β-γ preferences for travel time, arrival early and late penalties. This treatment not only destroys the continuity of user equilibrium (UE) departure rate, but also leaves out of considering the influences of continuity of schedule preference. In this paper, we investigate a specific bathtub model with continuous schedule preference (CSP) and explore the UE and social optimum (SO) solutions. Analytical and numerical results show that the introduction of CSP lets departure rate continuous. In the UE state, it results in traffic congestion being more costly and duration of hypercongestion being longer than existing bathtub models. In the SO state, the system cost becomes lower. Our study extends the knowledge about bathtub models and provides more insight into downtown traffic congestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Chuanyao & Huang, Haijun, 2019. "Analysis of bathtub congestion with continuous scheduling preference," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 45-54.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:45-54
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2019.05.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885918302543
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2019.05.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Hai & Hai-Jun, Huang, 1997. "Analysis of the time-varying pricing of a bottleneck with elastic demand using optimal control theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 425-440, November.
    2. Liu, Wei & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2016. "Modeling the morning commute for urban networks with cruising-for-parking: An MFD approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 470-494.
    3. Fosgerau, Mogens & Small, Kenneth A., 2013. "Hypercongestion in downtown metropolis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 122-134.
    4. Fosgerau, Mogens, 2015. "Congestion in the bathtub," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 241-255.
    5. Liu, Wei & Zhang, Fangni & Yang, Hai, 2017. "Modeling and managing morning commute with both household and individual travels," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 227-247.
    6. Abegaz, Dereje & Hjorth, Katrine & Rich, Jeppe, 2017. "Testing the slope model of scheduling preferences on stated preference data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 409-436.
    7. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2008. "Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 759-770, November.
    8. Chris Hendrickson & George Kocur, 1981. "Schedule Delay and Departure Time Decisions in a Deterministic Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 62-77, February.
    9. Ling-Ling Xiao & Hai-Jun Huang & Ronghui Liu, 2015. "Congestion Behavior and Tolls in a Bottleneck Model with Stochastic Capacity," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 46-65, February.
    10. Li, Chuan-Yao & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "User equilibrium of a single-entry traffic corridor with continuous scheduling preference," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 21-38.
    11. Li, Zhi-Chun & Lam, William H.K. & Wong, S.C., 2014. "Bottleneck model revisited: An activity-based perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 262-287.
    12. Arnott, Richard, 2013. "A bathtub model of downtown traffic congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 110-121.
    13. Arnott, Richard & Kokoza, Anatolii & Naji, Mehdi, 2016. "Equilibrium traffic dynamics in a bathtub model: A special case," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 7, pages 38-52.
    14. de Palma, André & Lindsey, Robin & Quinet, Emile, 2004. "5. Time-Varying Road Pricing And Choice Of Toll Locations," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 107-131, January.
    15. Vickrey, William S, 1969. "Congestion Theory and Transport Investment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 251-260, May.
    16. Small, Kenneth A, 1982. "The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(3), pages 467-479, June.
    17. Button, Kenneth, 2004. "1. The Rationale For Road Pricing: Standard Theory And Latest Advances," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 3-25, January.
    18. Arnott, Richard & Buli, Joshua, 2018. "Solving for equilibrium in the basic bathtub model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 150-175.
    19. Zhang, Fangni & Lindsey, Robin & Yang, Hai, 2016. "The Downs–Thomson paradox with imperfect mode substitutes and alternative transit administration regimes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 104-127.
    20. Wang, Wei (Walker) & Wang, David Z.W. & Zhang, Fangni & Sun, Huijun & Zhang, Wenyi & Wu, Jianjun, 2017. "Overcoming the Downs-Thomson Paradox by transit subsidy policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 126-147.
    21. Liu, Wei & Yin, Yafeng & Yang, Hai, 2015. "Effectiveness of variable speed limits considering commuters’ long-term response," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 498-519.
    22. Hjorth, Katrine & Börjesson, Maria & Engelson, Leonid & Fosgerau, Mogens, 2015. "Estimating exponential scheduling preferences," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 230-251.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bao, Yue & Verhoef, Erik T. & Koster, Paul, 2021. "Leaving the tub: The nature and dynamics of hypercongestion in a bathtub model with a restricted downstream exit," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Fu, Yulan & Wang, Chenlan & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2021. "Parking management in the morning commute problem with ridesharing," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Zhu, Tingting & Li, Yao & Long, Jiancheng, 2022. "Departure time choice equilibrium and tolling strategies for a bottleneck with continuous scheduling preference," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Lu, Xiao-Shan & Guo, Ren-Yong & Huang, Hai-Jun & Xu, Xiaoming & Chen, Jiajia, 2021. "Equilibrium analysis of parking for integrated daily commuting," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zhi-Chun & Huang, Hai-Jun & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 311-342.
    2. Chen, Zhi & Wu, Wen-Xiang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Shang, Hua-Yan, 2022. "Modeling traffic dynamics in periphery-downtown urban networks combining Vickrey's theory with Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram: user equilibrium, system optimum, and cordon pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 278-303.
    3. Li, Chuan-Yao & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "User equilibrium of a single-entry traffic corridor with continuous scheduling preference," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 21-38.
    4. Liu, Wei & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2016. "Modeling the morning commute for urban networks with cruising-for-parking: An MFD approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 470-494.
    5. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Modeling the dynamics of congestion in large urban networks using the macroscopic fundamental diagram: User equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 215-237.
    6. Lamotte, Raphaël & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2018. "The morning commute in urban areas with heterogeneous trip lengths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 794-810.
    7. Bao, Yue & Verhoef, Erik T. & Koster, Paul, 2021. "Leaving the tub: The nature and dynamics of hypercongestion in a bathtub model with a restricted downstream exit," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Arnott, Richard & Buli, Joshua, 2018. "Solving for equilibrium in the basic bathtub model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 150-175.
    9. Dantsuji, Takao & Takayama, Yuki & Fukuda, Daisuke, 2023. "Perimeter control in a mixed bimodal bathtub model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 267-291.
    10. Kathrin Goldmann & Gernot Sieg, 2020. "Quantifying the phantom jam externality: The case of an Autobahn section in Germany," Working Papers 30, Institute of Transport Economics, University of Muenster.
    11. Xiao, Yu & Coulombel, Nicolas & Palma, André de, 2017. "The valuation of travel time reliability: does congestion matter?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 113-141.
    12. Liu, Wei & Zhang, Fangni & Yang, Hai, 2017. "Modeling and managing morning commute with both household and individual travels," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 227-247.
    13. Zhu, Tingting & Li, Yao & Long, Jiancheng, 2022. "Departure time choice equilibrium and tolling strategies for a bottleneck with continuous scheduling preference," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Jin, Wen-Long, 2020. "Generalized bathtub model of network trip flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 138-157.
    15. Small, Kenneth A., 2015. "The bottleneck model: An assessment and interpretation," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 110-117.
    16. Liu, Wei & Szeto, Wai Yuen, 2020. "Learning and managing stochastic network traffic dynamics with an aggregate traffic representation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 19-46.
    17. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Shahabi, Mehrdad & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Optimal design of sustainable transit systems in congested urban networks: A macroscopic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 261-285.
    18. Li, Chuan-Yao & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2017. "Morning commute in a single-entry traffic corridor with early and late arrivals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 23-49.
    19. Kathrin Goldmann & Gernot Sieg, 2018. "Economic implications of phantom traffic jams: Evidence from traffic experiments," Working Papers 26, Institute of Transport Economics, University of Muenster.
    20. Kenneth Small, 2015. "The Bottleneck Model: An Assessment and Interpretation," Working Papers 141506, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bathtub model; Hypercongestion; User equilibrium; Social optimum; Continuous schedule preference;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:45-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.