IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v189y2024ics0191261524001140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective departure time allocation in large-scale urban networks: A flexible modeling framework with trip length and desired arrival time distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Ameli, Mostafa
  • Lebacque, Jean-Patrick
  • Alisoltani, Negin
  • Leclercq, Ludovic

Abstract

Urban traffic congestion remains a persistent issue for cities worldwide. Recent macroscopic models have adopted a mathematically well-defined relation between network flow and density to characterize traffic states over an urban region. Despite advances in these models, capturing the complex dynamics of urban traffic congestion requires considering the heterogeneous characteristics of trips. Classic macroscopic models, e.g., bottleneck and bathtub models and their extensions, have attempted to account for these characteristics, such as trip-length distribution and desired arrival times. However, they often make assumptions that fall short of reflecting real-world conditions. To address this, generalized bathtub models were recently proposed, introducing a new state variable to capture any distribution of remaining trip lengths. This study builds upon this work to formulate and solve the social optimum, a solution minimizing the sum of all users’ generalized (i.e., social and monetary) costs for a departure time choice model. The proposed framework can accommodate any distribution for desired arrival time and trip length, making it more adaptable to the diverse array of trip characteristics in an urban setting. In addition, the existence of the solution is proven, and the proposed solution method calculates the social optimum analytically. The numerical results show that the method is computationally efficient. The proposed methodology is validated on the real test case of Lyon North City, benchmarking with deterministic and stochastic user equilibria.

Suggested Citation

  • Ameli, Mostafa & Lebacque, Jean-Patrick & Alisoltani, Negin & Leclercq, Ludovic, 2024. "Collective departure time allocation in large-scale urban networks: A flexible modeling framework with trip length and desired arrival time distributions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:189:y:2024:i:c:s0191261524001140
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2024.102990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524001140
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2024.102990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnott, Richard & Kokoza, Anatolii & Naji, Mehdi, 2016. "Equilibrium traffic dynamics in a bathtub model: A special case," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 7, pages 38-52.
    2. Li, Zhi-Chun & Huang, Hai-Jun & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 311-342.
    3. Sida Luo, 2020. "Departure and travel time model for the temporal distribution of morning rush-hour traffic congestion," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 31(02), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Yu Liu & Chaogui Kang & Song Gao & Yu Xiao & Yuan Tian, 2012. "Understanding intra-urban trip patterns from taxi trajectory data," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 463-483, October.
    5. Bao, Yue & Verhoef, Erik T. & Koster, Paul, 2021. "Leaving the tub: The nature and dynamics of hypercongestion in a bathtub model with a restricted downstream exit," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Jianhui Wu & Yuanfa Ji & Xiyan Sun & Yan Xu & Mostafa Al-Emran, 2021. "Optimization Scheme of Fine Toll and Bus Departure Quantity for Bottleneck Congestion Management," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, March.
    7. Lindsey, Robin & de Palma, André & Silva, Hugo E., 2019. "Equilibrium in a dynamic model of congestion with large and small users," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 82-107.
    8. Kuwahara, Masao, 2007. "A theory and implications on dynamic marginal cost," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 627-643, August.
    9. Fosgerau, Mogens, 2015. "Congestion in the bathtub," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 241-255.
    10. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2008. "Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 759-770, November.
    11. Alisoltani, Negin & Leclercq, Ludovic & Zargayouna, Mahdi, 2021. "Can dynamic ride-sharing reduce traffic congestion?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 212-246.
    12. Nikolas Geroliminis & David M. Levinson, 2009. "Cordon Pricing Consistent with the Physics of Overcrowding," Springer Books, in: William H. K. Lam & S. C. Wong & Hong K. Lo (ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee, chapter 0, pages 219-240, Springer.
    13. Arnott, Richard & Buli, Joshua, 2018. "Solving for equilibrium in the basic bathtub model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 150-175.
    14. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Modeling the dynamics of congestion in large urban networks using the macroscopic fundamental diagram: User equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 215-237.
    15. Lamotte, Raphaël & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2018. "The morning commute in urban areas with heterogeneous trip lengths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 794-810.
    16. Arnott, Richard, 2013. "A bathtub model of downtown traffic congestion," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 110-121.
    17. Leclercq, Ludovic & Sénécat, Alméria & Mariotte, Guilhem, 2017. "Dynamic macroscopic simulation of on-street parking search: A trip-based approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 268-282.
    18. Richard Arnott & Moez Kilani, 2022. "Social Optimum in the Basic Bathtub Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1505-1529, November.
    19. Anna Nagurney & Ding Zhang, 1997. "Projected Dynamical Systems in the Formulation, Stability Analysis, and Computation of Fixed-Demand Traffic Network Equilibria," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 147-158, May.
    20. Negin Alisoltani & Mostafa Ameli & Mahdi Zargayouna & Ludovic Leclercq, 2022. "Space-time clustering-based method to optimize shareability in real-time ride-sharing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, January.
    21. Yang, Hai & Hai-Jun, Huang, 1997. "Analysis of the time-varying pricing of a bottleneck with elastic demand using optimal control theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 425-440, November.
    22. Aghamohammadi, Rafegh & Laval, Jorge A., 2020. "Dynamic traffic assignment using the macroscopic fundamental diagram: A Review of vehicular and pedestrian flow models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 99-118.
    23. Jin, Wen-Long, 2020. "Generalized bathtub model of network trip flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 138-157.
    24. Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Laval, Jorge A., 2006. "System optimum dynamic traffic assignment graphical solution method for a congested freeway and one destination," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 1-15, January.
    25. Mariotte, Guilhem & Leclercq, Ludovic & Batista, S.F.A. & Krug, Jean & Paipuri, Mahendra, 2020. "Calibration and validation of multi-reservoir MFD models: A case study in Lyon," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 62-86.
    26. Lamotte, Raphaël & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2021. "Monotonicity in the trip scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 14-25.
    27. Mariotte, Guilhem & Leclercq, Ludovic & Laval, Jorge A., 2017. "Macroscopic urban dynamics: Analytical and numerical comparisons of existing models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 245-267.
    28. Charalambos D. Aliprantis & Kim C. Border, 2006. "Infinite Dimensional Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-29587-7, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dantsuji, Takao & Takayama, Yuki & Fukuda, Daisuke, 2023. "Perimeter control in a mixed bimodal bathtub model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 267-291.
    2. Zhao, Chuan-Lin & Wu, Hai-Juan & Sun, Yang-Qi & Wu, Hao-Qiu & Niu, Dong-Bao, 2024. "A bathtub model with nonlinear velocity–density relation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 648(C).
    3. Lehe, Lewis J. & Pandey, Ayush, 2024. "A bathtub model of transit congestion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Bao, Yue & Verhoef, Erik T. & Koster, Paul, 2021. "Leaving the tub: The nature and dynamics of hypercongestion in a bathtub model with a restricted downstream exit," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Liu, Wei & Szeto, Wai Yuen, 2020. "Learning and managing stochastic network traffic dynamics with an aggregate traffic representation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 19-46.
    6. Huang, Y.P. & Xiong, J.H. & Sumalee, A. & Zheng, N. & Lam, W.H.K. & He, Z.B. & Zhong, R.X., 2020. "A dynamic user equilibrium model for multi-region macroscopic fundamental diagram systems with time-varying delays," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-25.
    7. Yildirimoglu, Mehmet & Ramezani, Mohsen, 2020. "Demand management with limited cooperation among travellers: A doubly dynamic approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 267-284.
    8. Jin, Wen-Long, 2020. "Generalized bathtub model of network trip flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 138-157.
    9. Arnott, Richard & Buli, Joshua, 2018. "Solving for equilibrium in the basic bathtub model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 150-175.
    10. Beojone, Caio Vitor & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2023. "A dynamic multi-region MFD model for ride-sourcing with ridesplitting," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Zheng, Nan & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2020. "Area-based equitable pricing strategies for multimodal urban networks with heterogeneous users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 357-374.
    12. Lehe, Lewis J., 2017. "Downtown tolls and the distribution of trip lengths," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 11, pages 23-32.
    13. Li, Zhi-Chun & Huang, Hai-Jun & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 311-342.
    14. Chen, Zhi & Wu, Wen-Xiang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Shang, Hua-Yan, 2022. "Modeling traffic dynamics in periphery-downtown urban networks combining Vickrey's theory with Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram: user equilibrium, system optimum, and cordon pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 278-303.
    15. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Modeling the dynamics of congestion in large urban networks using the macroscopic fundamental diagram: User equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 215-237.
    16. Li, Chuanyao & Huang, Haijun, 2019. "Analysis of bathtub congestion with continuous scheduling preference," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 45-54.
    17. Xiaojuan Yu & Vincent A.C. van den Berg & Erik T. Verhoef, 2024. "Preference heterogeneity in a dynamic flow congestion model," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-025/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    18. Gu, Ziyuan & Li, Yifan & Saberi, Meead & Rashidi, Taha H. & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2023. "Macroscopic parking dynamics and equitable pricing: Integrating trip-based modeling with simulation-based robust optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 354-381.
    19. Liu, Wei & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2016. "Modeling the morning commute for urban networks with cruising-for-parking: An MFD approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 470-494.
    20. Amirgholy, Mahyar & Shahabi, Mehrdad & Gao, H. Oliver, 2017. "Optimal design of sustainable transit systems in congested urban networks: A macroscopic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 261-285.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:189:y:2024:i:c:s0191261524001140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.