IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v97y2018icp119-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The growing importance of waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration in China's anthropogenic mercury emissions: Emission inventories and reduction strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Yuanan
  • Cheng, Hefa
  • Tao, Shu

Abstract

Waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration has been increasingly adopted for municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal in China, which already accounts for nearly 40% of the global installed capacity and electricity generation from WTE. This review identifies the growing importance of WTE incineration as a source of anthropogenic mercury emissions in China, summarizes the mercury control practices at WTE facilities, estimates the inventories of mercury emissions from WTE and those after the implementation of the more stringent air emission standards, and recommends key measures to further reduce the mercury emissions from WTE industry in China. WTE incineration in China was estimated to have a mean current mercury emission factor (EF) of 0.083 g/tonne (with 95% confidence intervals of 0.056–0.116 g/tonne) based on the mercury contents in MSW and the typical removal efficiencies of air pollution control devices (APCDs). The total mercury emissions from WTE incineration were estimated to be around 6.1 tonnes in 2016, and were predicted to reach 10.6 tonnes by 2020 based on its fast growth. The recently adopted more stringent emission standard for mercury can help curb the growth in mercury emissions from WTE incineration, while the gradual implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury is expected to contribute to significant reduction in the emissions of mercury from WTE incineration in the long run. Current estimations for mercury emission inventories from WTE incineration in China carry large uncertainty due to the overall scarcity of data. Thus, more work should be conducted to better monitor and quantify the mercury contents in MSW, and the mercury removal efficiencies of APCDs and the emission rates of mercury at WTE facilities. Meanwhile, China also needs to develop effective recycling and waste-sorting programs to divert the mercury-containing waste items from entering the incinerators and thus reduce the mercury emissions while promoting waste disposal by WTE.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Yuanan & Cheng, Hefa & Tao, Shu, 2018. "The growing importance of waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration in China's anthropogenic mercury emissions: Emission inventories and reduction strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 119-137.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:97:y:2018:i:c:p:119-137
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118306117
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Hoornweg & Perinaz Bhada-Tata & Chris Kennedy, 2013. "Environment: Waste production must peak this century," Nature, Nature, vol. 502(7473), pages 615-617, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro De Matteis & Fethiye Burcu Turkmen Ceylan & Mona Daoud & Anne Kahuthu, 2022. "A systemic approach to tackling ocean plastic debris," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 136-145, March.
    2. Imran Khan & Furrukh Bashir & Rashid Ahmad & Muhammad Ayub, 2021. "Shopping Motivation and Green Consumption: A Study about Green Buying Behavior of Pakistani Consumers," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 3(3), pages 233-242, December.
    3. Brogaard, Line K. & Damgaard, Anders & Jensen, Morten B. & Barlaz, Morton & Christensen, Thomas H., 2014. "Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 30-45.
    4. Bente Foereid & Julia Szocs, 2022. "Does Loading Ammonium to Sorbents Affect Plant Availability in Soil?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, July.
    5. Cui, Peizhe & Xu, Zaifeng & Yao, Dong & Qi, Huaqing & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Wang, Yinglong & Li, Xin & Liu, Zhiqiang & Yang, Sheng, 2022. "Life cycle water footprint and carbon footprint analysis of municipal sludge plasma gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    6. Vanessa Burg & Gillianne Bowman & Stefanie Hellweg & Oliver Thees, 2019. "Long-Term Wet Bioenergy Resources in Switzerland: Drivers and Projections until 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Yan Ma & Susu Cheng, 2023. "Channel coordination in a closed‐loop supply chain with fairness concerns under further extended producer responsibility," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 876-891, March.
    8. Carmen Avilés-Palacios & Ana Rodríguez-Olalla, 2021. "The Sustainability of Waste Management Models in Circular Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Gian Claudio Faussone & Andrej Kržan & Miha Grilc, 2021. "Conversion of Marine Litter from Venice Lagoon into Marine Fuels via Thermochemical Route: The Overview of Products, Their Yield, Quality and Environmental Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Sai Ge & Jun Ma & Lei Liu & Zhiming Yuan, 2020. "The Impact of Exogenous Aerobic Bacteria on Sustainable Methane Production Associated with Municipal Solid Waste Biodegradation: Revealed by High-Throughput Sequencing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Kumar Mangla, Sachin & Börühan, Gülmüş & Ersoy, Pervin & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Song, Malin, 2021. "Impact of information hiding on circular food supply chains in business-to-business context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-18.
    12. Friedrich A. Halstenberg & Kai Lindow & Rainer Stark, 2019. "Leveraging Circular Economy through a Methodology for Smart Service Systems Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-36, June.
    13. Lorren Kirsty Haywood & Thandi Kapwata & Suzan Oelofse & Gregory Breetzke & Caradee Yael Wright, 2021. "Waste Disposal Practices in Low-Income Settlements of South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, August.
    14. Ana I. Casarrubias-Jaimez & Ana Laura Juárez-López & José Luis Rosas-Acevedo & Maximino Reyes-Umaña & América Libertad Rodríguez-Herrera & Fernando Ramos-Quintana, 2021. "Feasibility Analysis of the Sustainability of the Tres Palos Coastal Lagoon: A Multifactorial Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Anabel Fernandez & Daniela Zalazar-García & Carla Lorenzo-Doncel & Diego Mauricio Yepes Maya & Electo Eduardo Silva Lora & Rosa Rodriguez & Germán Mazza, 2024. "Kinetic Modeling of Co-Pyrogasification in Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Management: Towards Sustainable Resource Recovery and Energy Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Jing Ma & Zhanbin Luo & Fu Chen & Qianlin Zhu & Shaoliang Zhang & Gang-Jun Liu, 2018. "A Practical Approach to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Open Dumps through Infrastructure Restructuring: A Case Study in Nanjing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    17. Kirtika Kohli & Sriraam R. Chandrasekaran & Ravindra Prajapati & Bidhya Kunwar & Sultan Al-Salem & Bryan R. Moser & Brajendra K. Sharma, 2022. "Pyrolytic Depolymerization Mechanisms for Post-Consumer Plastic Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, November.
    18. Liu, Xuyi & Kong, Hao & Zhang, Shun, 2021. "Can urbanization, renewable energy, and economic growth make environment more eco-friendly in Northeast Asia?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 23-33.
    19. Mateo Cordier & Takuro Uehara & Juan Baztan & Bethany Jorgensen, 2020. "Plastic pollution and economic growth: the influence of corruption and the lack of education," Working Papers hal-02862787, HAL.
    20. Krausmann, Fridolin & Gaugl, Birgit & West, James & Schandl, Heinz, 2016. "The metabolic transition of a planned economy: Material flows in the USSR and the Russian Federation 1900 to 2010," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 76-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:97:y:2018:i:c:p:119-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.