IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v69y2017icp112-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic characterization of electricity energy markets including plug-in electric vehicles

Author

Listed:
  • Khodakarami, Alireza
  • Farahani, Hassan Feshki
  • Aghaei, Jamshid

Abstract

Plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) have several capabilities to help the power system; for instance, one of them is participation in the energy market via vehicle to grid (V2G) technology. Due to some uncertain parameters such as battery state of charge (SOC), PEV availability, etc, they have stochastic behavior and it can affect the settlement of energy market. Accordingly, this paper proposes a framework for the stochastic clearing of electricity energy market in the presence of the PEVs while the uncertainties of PEVs and the synchronous generators are considered. The proposed stochastic energy market is cleared in two steps: at the first step, the random scenarios are generated using Monte-Carlo Simulation (MCS); then, at the second step, the stochastic market-clearing procedure is implemented as a series of deterministic optimization problems (scenarios) including non-contingent scenario and different post-contingency states. The network Total Cost (TC) is defined as an objective function and it is minimized for each scenario. In other words, the stochastic energy market is cleared based on the selection of the cheaper and proper energy providers, PEVs and synchronous generators, while the constraints are satisfied. The proposed optimization formulation is in the form of mixed integer nonlinear programming. Consequently, a heuristic based particle swarm optimization method has been adopted for the solution strategy. The effectiveness of the proposed method is examined based on a real case low voltage distribution system with 134 nodes.

Suggested Citation

  • Khodakarami, Alireza & Farahani, Hassan Feshki & Aghaei, Jamshid, 2017. "Stochastic characterization of electricity energy markets including plug-in electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 112-122.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:112-122
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116308425
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aien, Morteza & Hajebrahimi, Ali & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud, 2016. "A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1077-1089.
    2. Zhang, Sheng & Huang, Pei & Sun, Yongjun, 2016. "A multi-criterion renewable energy system design optimization for net zero energy buildings under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 654-665.
    3. Soroudi, Alireza & Ehsan, Mehdi, 2011. "A possibilistic-probabilistic tool for evaluating the impact of stochastic renewable and controllable power generation on energy losses in distribution networks--A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 794-800, January.
    4. Pantoš, Miloš, 2011. "Stochastic optimal charging of electric-drive vehicles with renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6567-6576.
    5. George B. Dantzig, 1955. "Linear Programming under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3-4), pages 197-206, 04-07.
    6. Božič, Dušan & Pantoš, Miloš, 2015. "Impact of electric-drive vehicles on power system reliability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 511-520.
    7. Vallée, François & Versèle, Christophe & Lobry, Jacques & Moiny, Francis, 2013. "Non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation tool in order to minimize gaseous pollutants emissions in presence of fluctuating wind power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 317-324.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerardo J. Osório & Miadreza Shafie-khah & Pedro D. L. Coimbra & Mohamed Lotfi & João P. S. Catalão, 2018. "Distribution System Operation with Electric Vehicle Charging Schedules and Renewable Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Mahmoudzadeh Andwari, Amin & Pesiridis, Apostolos & Rajoo, Srithar & Martinez-Botas, Ricardo & Esfahanian, Vahid, 2017. "A review of Battery Electric Vehicle technology and readiness levels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 414-430.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aien, Morteza & Hajebrahimi, Ali & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud, 2016. "A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1077-1089.
    2. Zubo, Rana.H.A. & Mokryani, Geev & Rajamani, Haile-Selassie & Aghaei, Jamshid & Niknam, Taher & Pillai, Prashant, 2017. "Operation and planning of distribution networks with integration of renewable distributed generators considering uncertainties: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1177-1198.
    3. Soares, João & Borges, Nuno & Fotouhi Ghazvini, Mohammad Ali & Vale, Zita & de Moura Oliveira, P.B., 2016. "Scenario generation for electric vehicles' uncertain behavior in a smart city environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 664-675.
    4. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "A review of uncertainty characterisation approaches for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    5. Mukhopadhyay, Bineeta & Das, Debapriya, 2021. "Optimal multi-objective expansion planning of a droop-regulated islanded microgrid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    6. Davidov, Sreten & Pantoš, Miloš, 2017. "Stochastic expansion planning of the electric-drive vehicle charging infrastructure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 189-201.
    7. Kharrazi, A. & Sreeram, V. & Mishra, Y., 2020. "Assessment techniques of the impact of grid-tied rooftop photovoltaic generation on the power quality of low voltage distribution network - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Xu, Jiuping & Tian, Yalou & Wang, Fengjuan & Yang, Guocan & Zhao, Chuandang, 2024. "Resilience-economy-environment equilibrium based configuration interaction approach towards distributed energy system in energy intensive industry parks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Talari, Saber & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Osório, Gerardo J. & Aghaei, Jamshid & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "Stochastic modelling of renewable energy sources from operators' point-of-view: A survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1953-1965.
    10. Ehsan, Ali & Yang, Qiang, 2019. "State-of-the-art techniques for modelling of uncertainties in active distribution network planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1509-1523.
    11. Zhang, Qi & Mclellan, Benjamin C. & Tezuka, Tetsuo & Ishihara, Keiichi N., 2013. "A methodology for economic and environmental analysis of electric vehicles with different operational conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 118-127.
    12. J. F. F. Almeida & S. V. Conceição & L. R. Pinto & B. R. P. Oliveira & L. F. Rodrigues, 2022. "Optimal sales and operations planning for integrated steel industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 773-790, August.
    13. Grover-Silva, Etta & Heleno, Miguel & Mashayekh, Salman & Cardoso, Gonçalo & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, George, 2018. "A stochastic optimal power flow for scheduling flexible resources in microgrids operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 201-208.
    14. Zhang, Sheng & Lin, Zhang & Ai, Zhengtao & Huan, Chao & Cheng, Yong & Wang, Fenghao, 2019. "Multi-criteria performance optimization for operation of stratum ventilation under heating mode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 969-980.
    15. Li, Yanfu & Zio, Enrico, 2012. "Uncertainty analysis of the adequacy assessment model of a distributed generation system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 235-244.
    16. Arie M. C. A. Koster & Michael Poss, 2018. "Special issue on: robust combinatorial optimization," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 207-209, September.
    17. Gianluca Fulli & Marcelo Masera & Catalin Felix Covrig & Francesco Profumo & Ettore Bompard & Tao Huang, 2017. "The EU Electricity Security Decision-Analytic Framework: Status and Perspective Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Liu, Jiejie & Li, Yao & Ma, Yanan & Qin, Ruomu & Meng, Xianyang & Wu, Jiangtao, 2023. "Two-layer multiple scenario optimization framework for integrated energy system based on optimal energy contribution ratio strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    19. Rashed Khanjani-Shiraz & Ali Babapour-Azar & Zohreh Hosseini-Noudeh & Panos M. Pardalos, 2022. "Distributionally robust maximum probability shortest path problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 140-167, January.
    20. Walid Ben-Ameur & Adam Ouorou & Guanglei Wang & Mateusz Żotkiewicz, 2018. "Multipolar robust optimization," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(4), pages 395-434, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:69:y:2017:i:c:p:112-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.