IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v57y2016icp1077-1089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies

Author

Listed:
  • Aien, Morteza
  • Hajebrahimi, Ali
  • Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud

Abstract

As a direct consequence of power systems restructuring on one hand and unprecedented renewable energy utilization on the other, the uncertainties of power systems are getting more and more attention. This fact intensifies the difficulty of decision making in the power system context; therefore, the uncertainty analysis of the system performance seems necessary. Generally, uncertainties in any engineering system study can be represented probabilistically or possibilistically. When sufficient historical data of the system variables is not available, a probability density function (PDF) might not be defined, they must be represented in another manner i.e. using possibilistic theory. When some of the system uncertain variables are probabilistic and some are possibilistic, neither the conventional pure probabilistic nor pure possibilistic methods can be implemented. Hence, a combined solution is needed. This paper gives a complete review on uncertainty modeling approaches for power system studies making sense about the strengths and weakness of these methods. This work may be used in order to select the most appropriate method for each application.

Suggested Citation

  • Aien, Morteza & Hajebrahimi, Ali & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud, 2016. "A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1077-1089.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:1077-1089
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115014537
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vallée, François & Versèle, Christophe & Lobry, Jacques & Moiny, Francis, 2013. "Non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation tool in order to minimize gaseous pollutants emissions in presence of fluctuating wind power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 317-324.
    2. Soroudi, Alireza & Ehsan, Mehdi, 2011. "A possibilistic-probabilistic tool for evaluating the impact of stochastic renewable and controllable power generation on energy losses in distribution networks--A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 794-800, January.
    3. Ferrario, E. & Zio, E., 2014. "Assessing nuclear power plant safety and recovery from earthquakes using a system-of-systems approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 103-116.
    4. George B. Dantzig, 1955. "Linear Programming under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3-4), pages 197-206, 04-07.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khodakarami, Alireza & Farahani, Hassan Feshki & Aghaei, Jamshid, 2017. "Stochastic characterization of electricity energy markets including plug-in electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 112-122.
    2. Zubo, Rana.H.A. & Mokryani, Geev & Rajamani, Haile-Selassie & Aghaei, Jamshid & Niknam, Taher & Pillai, Prashant, 2017. "Operation and planning of distribution networks with integration of renewable distributed generators considering uncertainties: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1177-1198.
    3. Ehsan, Ali & Yang, Qiang, 2019. "State-of-the-art techniques for modelling of uncertainties in active distribution network planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1509-1523.
    4. J. F. F. Almeida & S. V. Conceição & L. R. Pinto & B. R. P. Oliveira & L. F. Rodrigues, 2022. "Optimal sales and operations planning for integrated steel industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 773-790, August.
    5. Li, Yanfu & Zio, Enrico, 2012. "Uncertainty analysis of the adequacy assessment model of a distributed generation system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 235-244.
    6. Arie M. C. A. Koster & Michael Poss, 2018. "Special issue on: robust combinatorial optimization," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 207-209, September.
    7. Rashed Khanjani-Shiraz & Ali Babapour-Azar & Zohreh Hosseini-Noudeh & Panos M. Pardalos, 2022. "Distributionally robust maximum probability shortest path problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 140-167, January.
    8. Walid Ben-Ameur & Adam Ouorou & Guanglei Wang & Mateusz Żotkiewicz, 2018. "Multipolar robust optimization," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(4), pages 395-434, December.
    9. Ketabchi, Saeed & Behboodi-Kahoo, Malihe, 2015. "Augmented Lagrangian method within L-shaped method for stochastic linear programs," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 12-20.
    10. Adi Ben-Israel & Aharon Ben-Tal, 1997. "Duality and equilibrium prices in economics of uncertainty," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 46(1), pages 51-85, February.
    11. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    12. Garoian, Lee & Conner, J. Richard & Scifres, C.J., 1987. "A Discrete Stochastic Programming Model To Estimate Optimal Burning Schedules On Rangeland," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-8, December.
    13. Zhou, Feng & Huang, Gordon H. & Chen, Guo-Xian & Guo, Huai-Cheng, 2009. "Enhanced-interval linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 323-333, December.
    14. Bastian, Nathaniel D. & Lunday, Brian J. & Fisher, Christopher B. & Hall, Andrew O., 2020. "Models and methods for workforce planning under uncertainty: Optimizing U.S. Army cyber branch readiness and manning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Kanudia, Amit & Loulou, Richard, 1998. "Robust responses to climate change via stochastic MARKAL: The case of Quebec," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 15-30, April.
    16. Walter J. Gutjahr & Alois Pichler, 2016. "Stochastic multi-objective optimization: a survey on non-scalarizing methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 475-499, January.
    17. Wu, Zhongqi & Jiang, Hui & Zhou, Yangye & Li, Haoyan, 2024. "Enhancing emergency medical service location model for spatial accessibility and equity under random demand and travel time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    18. repec:dgr:rugsom:03a14 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Jung, Jaesung & Onen, Ahmet & Russell, Kevin & Broadwater, Robert P., 2015. "Local steady-state and quasi steady-state impact studies of high photovoltaic generation penetration in power distribution circuits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 569-583.
    20. John Bistline & John Weyant, 2013. "Electric sector investments under technological and policy-related uncertainties: a stochastic programming approach," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 143-160, November.
    21. Maji, Chandi Charan, 1975. "Intertemporal allocation of irrigation water in the Mayurakshi Project (India): an application of deterministic and chance-constrained linear programming," ISU General Staff Papers 197501010800006381, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:57:y:2016:i:c:p:1077-1089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.