IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v203y2024ics136403212400488x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying social factors for onshore wind planning – A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Tsani, Tsamara
  • Weinand, Jann Michael
  • Linßen, Jochen
  • Stolten, Detlef

Abstract

The integration of social factors into quantitative planning models is essential for accelerating the deployment of onshore wind turbines by identifying feasible potential early in the planning stage. This systematic literature review analyzes the existing quantification of social factors associated with onshore wind power and methods for integrating these factors into planning models. Disamenities due to visual and landscape impacts, proximity to settlements, and justice considerations are the most quantified so far and frequently cited as being the most important factors affecting the social acceptance of onshore wind turbines. Furthermore, the quantification of these could be improved through visual impact assessment techniques, standardized choice experiments, and the assessment of justice beyond the spatial distribution tenet. Future research should also focus on understanding the dynamics of social acceptance and the resulting uncertainty of quantified social factors. Amongst the different planning models, multi-objective optimization has become increasingly popular, as it can integrate social factors endogenously and exogenously, is suitable for different planning scales, and is able to examine the trade-offs between cost-effectiveness, local disamenities, and distributional justice. However, very few studies have investigated the impact of using different methods for quantifying social factors on the resulting socially- and techno-economically-optimal system costs and spatial turbine allocations. Challenges also remain in overcoming the complexity for integrating network connection costs and their externalities into planning models. This review serves as an overview for energy system modelers, planners, and quantitative social scientists to better integrate social factors into onshore wind planning models.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsani, Tsamara & Weinand, Jann Michael & Linßen, Jochen & Stolten, Detlef, 2024. "Quantifying social factors for onshore wind planning – A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s136403212400488x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400488X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s136403212400488x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.